Beyond pointing and clicking

How do newer interaction modalities affect user engagement?

S. Shyam Sundar, Jeeyun Oh, Qian Xu, Haiyan Jia, Saraswathi Bellur

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Modern interfaces offer users a wider range of interaction modalities beyond pointing and clicking, such as dragging, sliding, zooming, and flipping through images. But, do they offer any distinct psychological advantages? We address this question with an experiment (N = 128) testing the relative contributions made by six interaction modalities (zoomin/out, drag, slide, mouse-over, cover-flow and click-to-download) to user engagement with identical content. Data suggest that slide is better at aiding memory than the other modalities, whereas cover-flow and mouseover generate more user actions. Mouse-over, click-to-download, and zoom-in/out tend to foster more favorable attitudes among power users, whereas cover-flow and slide generate more positive attitudes among non-power users. Design implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCHI EA 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts
Pages1477-1482
Number of pages6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 8 2011
Event29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011 - Vancouver, BC, Canada
Duration: May 7 2011May 12 2011

Publication series

NameConference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Other

Other29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011
CountryCanada
CityVancouver, BC
Period5/7/115/12/11

Fingerprint

User interfaces
Drag
Data storage equipment
Testing
Experiments

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Software
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design

Cite this

Shyam Sundar, S., Oh, J., Xu, Q., Jia, H., & Bellur, S. (2011). Beyond pointing and clicking: How do newer interaction modalities affect user engagement? In CHI EA 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts (pp. 1477-1482). (Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings). https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979794
Shyam Sundar, S. ; Oh, Jeeyun ; Xu, Qian ; Jia, Haiyan ; Bellur, Saraswathi. / Beyond pointing and clicking : How do newer interaction modalities affect user engagement?. CHI EA 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts. 2011. pp. 1477-1482 (Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings).
@inproceedings{4bde6841f7034493aada63e4f1b00c97,
title = "Beyond pointing and clicking: How do newer interaction modalities affect user engagement?",
abstract = "Modern interfaces offer users a wider range of interaction modalities beyond pointing and clicking, such as dragging, sliding, zooming, and flipping through images. But, do they offer any distinct psychological advantages? We address this question with an experiment (N = 128) testing the relative contributions made by six interaction modalities (zoomin/out, drag, slide, mouse-over, cover-flow and click-to-download) to user engagement with identical content. Data suggest that slide is better at aiding memory than the other modalities, whereas cover-flow and mouseover generate more user actions. Mouse-over, click-to-download, and zoom-in/out tend to foster more favorable attitudes among power users, whereas cover-flow and slide generate more positive attitudes among non-power users. Design implications are discussed.",
author = "{Shyam Sundar}, S. and Jeeyun Oh and Qian Xu and Haiyan Jia and Saraswathi Bellur",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1145/1979742.1979794",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781450302289",
series = "Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings",
pages = "1477--1482",
booktitle = "CHI EA 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts",

}

Shyam Sundar, S, Oh, J, Xu, Q, Jia, H & Bellur, S 2011, Beyond pointing and clicking: How do newer interaction modalities affect user engagement? in CHI EA 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, pp. 1477-1482, 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5/7/11. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979794

Beyond pointing and clicking : How do newer interaction modalities affect user engagement? / Shyam Sundar, S.; Oh, Jeeyun; Xu, Qian; Jia, Haiyan; Bellur, Saraswathi.

CHI EA 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts. 2011. p. 1477-1482 (Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Beyond pointing and clicking

T2 - How do newer interaction modalities affect user engagement?

AU - Shyam Sundar, S.

AU - Oh, Jeeyun

AU - Xu, Qian

AU - Jia, Haiyan

AU - Bellur, Saraswathi

PY - 2011/6/8

Y1 - 2011/6/8

N2 - Modern interfaces offer users a wider range of interaction modalities beyond pointing and clicking, such as dragging, sliding, zooming, and flipping through images. But, do they offer any distinct psychological advantages? We address this question with an experiment (N = 128) testing the relative contributions made by six interaction modalities (zoomin/out, drag, slide, mouse-over, cover-flow and click-to-download) to user engagement with identical content. Data suggest that slide is better at aiding memory than the other modalities, whereas cover-flow and mouseover generate more user actions. Mouse-over, click-to-download, and zoom-in/out tend to foster more favorable attitudes among power users, whereas cover-flow and slide generate more positive attitudes among non-power users. Design implications are discussed.

AB - Modern interfaces offer users a wider range of interaction modalities beyond pointing and clicking, such as dragging, sliding, zooming, and flipping through images. But, do they offer any distinct psychological advantages? We address this question with an experiment (N = 128) testing the relative contributions made by six interaction modalities (zoomin/out, drag, slide, mouse-over, cover-flow and click-to-download) to user engagement with identical content. Data suggest that slide is better at aiding memory than the other modalities, whereas cover-flow and mouseover generate more user actions. Mouse-over, click-to-download, and zoom-in/out tend to foster more favorable attitudes among power users, whereas cover-flow and slide generate more positive attitudes among non-power users. Design implications are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957933446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957933446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/1979742.1979794

DO - 10.1145/1979742.1979794

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781450302289

T3 - Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

SP - 1477

EP - 1482

BT - CHI EA 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts

ER -

Shyam Sundar S, Oh J, Xu Q, Jia H, Bellur S. Beyond pointing and clicking: How do newer interaction modalities affect user engagement? In CHI EA 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts. 2011. p. 1477-1482. (Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings). https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979794