Bias in the heavenly chorus: Interests in society and before government

David Lynn Lowery, Virginia Gray

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Counts of lobbying organizations before government long have been used to assess overall bias in the politics of interest representation (Schattschneider, 1960). We argue that this effort is fundamentally flawed, that we cannot extract useful conclusions about interest system bias from one-shot lists of organizations seeking influence. We first examine the extensive literature on bias in interest representation, highlighting the uneven attention of scholars to its two core assumptions. We then turn to enumerating the many ways in which the distribution of interests in society and before government are unlikely to be isomorphic over time or over space. Finally, we return to the still vital question of bias in interest representation to consider how it can be addressed in a more satisfactory, if indirect, manner.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-30
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Theoretical Politics
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

trend
representation of interests
politics
Society
literature
time

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Lowery, David Lynn ; Gray, Virginia. / Bias in the heavenly chorus : Interests in society and before government. In: Journal of Theoretical Politics. 2004 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 5-30.
@article{603c206e0d514ed3b4180326432f6eaa,
title = "Bias in the heavenly chorus: Interests in society and before government",
abstract = "Counts of lobbying organizations before government long have been used to assess overall bias in the politics of interest representation (Schattschneider, 1960). We argue that this effort is fundamentally flawed, that we cannot extract useful conclusions about interest system bias from one-shot lists of organizations seeking influence. We first examine the extensive literature on bias in interest representation, highlighting the uneven attention of scholars to its two core assumptions. We then turn to enumerating the many ways in which the distribution of interests in society and before government are unlikely to be isomorphic over time or over space. Finally, we return to the still vital question of bias in interest representation to consider how it can be addressed in a more satisfactory, if indirect, manner.",
author = "Lowery, {David Lynn} and Virginia Gray",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0951629804038900",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "5--30",
journal = "Journal of Theoretical Politics",
issn = "0951-6298",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Bias in the heavenly chorus : Interests in society and before government. / Lowery, David Lynn; Gray, Virginia.

In: Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.01.2004, p. 5-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bias in the heavenly chorus

T2 - Interests in society and before government

AU - Lowery, David Lynn

AU - Gray, Virginia

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Counts of lobbying organizations before government long have been used to assess overall bias in the politics of interest representation (Schattschneider, 1960). We argue that this effort is fundamentally flawed, that we cannot extract useful conclusions about interest system bias from one-shot lists of organizations seeking influence. We first examine the extensive literature on bias in interest representation, highlighting the uneven attention of scholars to its two core assumptions. We then turn to enumerating the many ways in which the distribution of interests in society and before government are unlikely to be isomorphic over time or over space. Finally, we return to the still vital question of bias in interest representation to consider how it can be addressed in a more satisfactory, if indirect, manner.

AB - Counts of lobbying organizations before government long have been used to assess overall bias in the politics of interest representation (Schattschneider, 1960). We argue that this effort is fundamentally flawed, that we cannot extract useful conclusions about interest system bias from one-shot lists of organizations seeking influence. We first examine the extensive literature on bias in interest representation, highlighting the uneven attention of scholars to its two core assumptions. We then turn to enumerating the many ways in which the distribution of interests in society and before government are unlikely to be isomorphic over time or over space. Finally, we return to the still vital question of bias in interest representation to consider how it can be addressed in a more satisfactory, if indirect, manner.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642499317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642499317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0951629804038900

DO - 10.1177/0951629804038900

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:1642499317

VL - 16

SP - 5

EP - 30

JO - Journal of Theoretical Politics

JF - Journal of Theoretical Politics

SN - 0951-6298

IS - 1

ER -