BICA and Sex Differences

We Need to Understand Potential Sex Differences when Developing Computational Models of Human Behavior

Christopher L. Dancy, Frank E. Ritter

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Abstract

Validating computational models of human behavior typically involves statistically comparing human data collected during an experiment to predictions made by the model. However, these models very rarely attempt to represent sex, despite the growing indication that there are sex-based differences in neural and behavioral responses to some external stimuli. We make a case for a stronger presence of male and female models of behavior in biologically inspired cognitive architectures, an area of research that is especially susceptible to physiological differences that can cause bottom-up behavioral differences. We conclude with discussion of previous data collected that highlight the importance of providing more focus on sex-based differences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)131-132
Number of pages2
JournalProcedia Computer Science
Volume71
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Event6th Annual International Conference on Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, BICA 2015 - Lyon, France
Duration: Nov 6 2015Nov 8 2015

Fingerprint

Experiments

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Science(all)

Cite this

@article{6a16012aa8044aeb8b6c5b62ad7860e7,
title = "BICA and Sex Differences: We Need to Understand Potential Sex Differences when Developing Computational Models of Human Behavior",
abstract = "Validating computational models of human behavior typically involves statistically comparing human data collected during an experiment to predictions made by the model. However, these models very rarely attempt to represent sex, despite the growing indication that there are sex-based differences in neural and behavioral responses to some external stimuli. We make a case for a stronger presence of male and female models of behavior in biologically inspired cognitive architectures, an area of research that is especially susceptible to physiological differences that can cause bottom-up behavioral differences. We conclude with discussion of previous data collected that highlight the importance of providing more focus on sex-based differences.",
author = "Dancy, {Christopher L.} and Ritter, {Frank E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.176",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "131--132",
journal = "Procedia Computer Science",
issn = "1877-0509",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

BICA and Sex Differences : We Need to Understand Potential Sex Differences when Developing Computational Models of Human Behavior. / Dancy, Christopher L.; Ritter, Frank E.

In: Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 71, 01.01.2015, p. 131-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

TY - JOUR

T1 - BICA and Sex Differences

T2 - We Need to Understand Potential Sex Differences when Developing Computational Models of Human Behavior

AU - Dancy, Christopher L.

AU - Ritter, Frank E.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Validating computational models of human behavior typically involves statistically comparing human data collected during an experiment to predictions made by the model. However, these models very rarely attempt to represent sex, despite the growing indication that there are sex-based differences in neural and behavioral responses to some external stimuli. We make a case for a stronger presence of male and female models of behavior in biologically inspired cognitive architectures, an area of research that is especially susceptible to physiological differences that can cause bottom-up behavioral differences. We conclude with discussion of previous data collected that highlight the importance of providing more focus on sex-based differences.

AB - Validating computational models of human behavior typically involves statistically comparing human data collected during an experiment to predictions made by the model. However, these models very rarely attempt to represent sex, despite the growing indication that there are sex-based differences in neural and behavioral responses to some external stimuli. We make a case for a stronger presence of male and female models of behavior in biologically inspired cognitive architectures, an area of research that is especially susceptible to physiological differences that can cause bottom-up behavioral differences. We conclude with discussion of previous data collected that highlight the importance of providing more focus on sex-based differences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962775486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962775486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.176

DO - 10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.176

M3 - Conference article

VL - 71

SP - 131

EP - 132

JO - Procedia Computer Science

JF - Procedia Computer Science

SN - 1877-0509

ER -