Biceps tenodesis versus tenotomy

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of review: The purpose of this paper is to review the most recent literature regarding biceps tenotomy and tenodesis. The indications, advantages, and disadvantages for both procedures are provided. Recent findings: In recent years a better appreciation of the biceps tendon as a significant source of pain in the shoulder has developed. Biceps tenotomy or tenodesis may be considered when irreversible structural changes exist within the biceps tendon or in situations where an autotenodesis is likely to occur. Limited research suggests that biceps tenotomy may be an alternative to biceps tenodesis in certain clinical situations. Recent literature has focused on new arthroscopic techniques for biceps tenodesis. Summary: Biceps tenodesis has been the mainstay of treatment for operative biceps pathologic conditions; however, more recent literature suggests that a simple biceps tenotomy may be considered in individuals older than 50 years.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)239-241
Number of pages3
JournalCurrent Opinion in Orthopaedics
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2004

Fingerprint

Tenodesis
Tenotomy
Tendons
Shoulder Pain
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

@article{672fa4157c984f6ea2dbd09db461a16f,
title = "Biceps tenodesis versus tenotomy",
abstract = "Purpose of review: The purpose of this paper is to review the most recent literature regarding biceps tenotomy and tenodesis. The indications, advantages, and disadvantages for both procedures are provided. Recent findings: In recent years a better appreciation of the biceps tendon as a significant source of pain in the shoulder has developed. Biceps tenotomy or tenodesis may be considered when irreversible structural changes exist within the biceps tendon or in situations where an autotenodesis is likely to occur. Limited research suggests that biceps tenotomy may be an alternative to biceps tenodesis in certain clinical situations. Recent literature has focused on new arthroscopic techniques for biceps tenodesis. Summary: Biceps tenodesis has been the mainstay of treatment for operative biceps pathologic conditions; however, more recent literature suggests that a simple biceps tenotomy may be considered in individuals older than 50 years.",
author = "April Armstrong",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1097/00001433-200408000-00007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "239--241",
journal = "Current Orthopaedic Practice",
issn = "1940-7041",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

Biceps tenodesis versus tenotomy. / Armstrong, April.

In: Current Opinion in Orthopaedics, Vol. 15, No. 4, 08.2004, p. 239-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biceps tenodesis versus tenotomy

AU - Armstrong, April

PY - 2004/8

Y1 - 2004/8

N2 - Purpose of review: The purpose of this paper is to review the most recent literature regarding biceps tenotomy and tenodesis. The indications, advantages, and disadvantages for both procedures are provided. Recent findings: In recent years a better appreciation of the biceps tendon as a significant source of pain in the shoulder has developed. Biceps tenotomy or tenodesis may be considered when irreversible structural changes exist within the biceps tendon or in situations where an autotenodesis is likely to occur. Limited research suggests that biceps tenotomy may be an alternative to biceps tenodesis in certain clinical situations. Recent literature has focused on new arthroscopic techniques for biceps tenodesis. Summary: Biceps tenodesis has been the mainstay of treatment for operative biceps pathologic conditions; however, more recent literature suggests that a simple biceps tenotomy may be considered in individuals older than 50 years.

AB - Purpose of review: The purpose of this paper is to review the most recent literature regarding biceps tenotomy and tenodesis. The indications, advantages, and disadvantages for both procedures are provided. Recent findings: In recent years a better appreciation of the biceps tendon as a significant source of pain in the shoulder has developed. Biceps tenotomy or tenodesis may be considered when irreversible structural changes exist within the biceps tendon or in situations where an autotenodesis is likely to occur. Limited research suggests that biceps tenotomy may be an alternative to biceps tenodesis in certain clinical situations. Recent literature has focused on new arthroscopic techniques for biceps tenodesis. Summary: Biceps tenodesis has been the mainstay of treatment for operative biceps pathologic conditions; however, more recent literature suggests that a simple biceps tenotomy may be considered in individuals older than 50 years.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3142718261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3142718261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00001433-200408000-00007

DO - 10.1097/00001433-200408000-00007

M3 - Review article

VL - 15

SP - 239

EP - 241

JO - Current Orthopaedic Practice

JF - Current Orthopaedic Practice

SN - 1940-7041

IS - 4

ER -