Bidirectional lexical interaction in late immersed Mandarin-English bilinguals

Barbara C. Malt, Ping Li, Aneta Pavlenko, Huichun Zhu, Eef Ameel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compared naming patterns for common household objects by monolingual speakers of English and Mandarin and Mandarin-English bilinguals in both their L1 and L2. These bilinguals arrived in the U.S. no earlier than age 15, thus having a well-entrenched L1 and relatively late L2 immersion, and their two languages are dissimilar on many dimensions. Results showed changes to both L1 and L2 word use that increased with greater L2 usage, implying that the lexical network remains plastic over an extended time period. The influence of each language on the other can be understood in the context of specific L1-L2 lexical category differences and other semantic variables. The bilingual outcomes are not consistent with perspectives in which the network stabilizes once an L1 is well-entrenched, nor in which speaking dissimilar languages or continuing to use L1 protects L1 from change. Instead, it supports a more dynamic view of lexical representation in which L1 and L2 representations can be modified at any time and interconnections between them cause each to impact the other.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)86-104
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume82
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

Language
Semantics
Plastics
interaction
language
Immersion
interconnection
speaking
semantics
cause
Interaction
time
Household Objects
Causes
Naming
Lexical Category
Lexical Representation
Lexical Networks

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Malt, Barbara C. ; Li, Ping ; Pavlenko, Aneta ; Zhu, Huichun ; Ameel, Eef. / Bidirectional lexical interaction in late immersed Mandarin-English bilinguals. In: Journal of Memory and Language. 2015 ; Vol. 82. pp. 86-104.
@article{8c37ccf9d7b445dfae4c82b9cce919f3,
title = "Bidirectional lexical interaction in late immersed Mandarin-English bilinguals",
abstract = "We compared naming patterns for common household objects by monolingual speakers of English and Mandarin and Mandarin-English bilinguals in both their L1 and L2. These bilinguals arrived in the U.S. no earlier than age 15, thus having a well-entrenched L1 and relatively late L2 immersion, and their two languages are dissimilar on many dimensions. Results showed changes to both L1 and L2 word use that increased with greater L2 usage, implying that the lexical network remains plastic over an extended time period. The influence of each language on the other can be understood in the context of specific L1-L2 lexical category differences and other semantic variables. The bilingual outcomes are not consistent with perspectives in which the network stabilizes once an L1 is well-entrenched, nor in which speaking dissimilar languages or continuing to use L1 protects L1 from change. Instead, it supports a more dynamic view of lexical representation in which L1 and L2 representations can be modified at any time and interconnections between them cause each to impact the other.",
author = "Malt, {Barbara C.} and Ping Li and Aneta Pavlenko and Huichun Zhu and Eef Ameel",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jml.2015.03.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "86--104",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Bidirectional lexical interaction in late immersed Mandarin-English bilinguals. / Malt, Barbara C.; Li, Ping; Pavlenko, Aneta; Zhu, Huichun; Ameel, Eef.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 82, 01.07.2015, p. 86-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bidirectional lexical interaction in late immersed Mandarin-English bilinguals

AU - Malt, Barbara C.

AU - Li, Ping

AU - Pavlenko, Aneta

AU - Zhu, Huichun

AU - Ameel, Eef

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - We compared naming patterns for common household objects by monolingual speakers of English and Mandarin and Mandarin-English bilinguals in both their L1 and L2. These bilinguals arrived in the U.S. no earlier than age 15, thus having a well-entrenched L1 and relatively late L2 immersion, and their two languages are dissimilar on many dimensions. Results showed changes to both L1 and L2 word use that increased with greater L2 usage, implying that the lexical network remains plastic over an extended time period. The influence of each language on the other can be understood in the context of specific L1-L2 lexical category differences and other semantic variables. The bilingual outcomes are not consistent with perspectives in which the network stabilizes once an L1 is well-entrenched, nor in which speaking dissimilar languages or continuing to use L1 protects L1 from change. Instead, it supports a more dynamic view of lexical representation in which L1 and L2 representations can be modified at any time and interconnections between them cause each to impact the other.

AB - We compared naming patterns for common household objects by monolingual speakers of English and Mandarin and Mandarin-English bilinguals in both their L1 and L2. These bilinguals arrived in the U.S. no earlier than age 15, thus having a well-entrenched L1 and relatively late L2 immersion, and their two languages are dissimilar on many dimensions. Results showed changes to both L1 and L2 word use that increased with greater L2 usage, implying that the lexical network remains plastic over an extended time period. The influence of each language on the other can be understood in the context of specific L1-L2 lexical category differences and other semantic variables. The bilingual outcomes are not consistent with perspectives in which the network stabilizes once an L1 is well-entrenched, nor in which speaking dissimilar languages or continuing to use L1 protects L1 from change. Instead, it supports a more dynamic view of lexical representation in which L1 and L2 representations can be modified at any time and interconnections between them cause each to impact the other.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926350636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926350636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2015.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2015.03.001

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 86

EP - 104

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

ER -