TY - JOUR
T1 - Biochemometrics for Natural Products Research
T2 - Comparison of Data Analysis Approaches and Application to Identification of Bioactive Compounds
AU - Kellogg, Joshua J.
AU - Todd, Daniel A.
AU - Egan, Joseph M.
AU - Raja, Huzefa A.
AU - Oberlies, Nicholas H.
AU - Kvalheim, Olav M.
AU - Cech, Nadja B.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health (grant 1R01 AT006860), and by a Biotechnology Research Grant (2011-BRG-1206) from the North Carolina Biotechnology Center. Mass spectrometry data were collected in the Triad Mass Spectrometry Facility. We thank S. Anike and Dr. A. Kaur for technical assistance and V. Sica for assistance with manuscript editing.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Chemical Society and American Society of Pharmacognosy.
PY - 2016/2/26
Y1 - 2016/2/26
N2 - A central challenge of natural products research is assigning bioactive compounds from complex mixtures. The gold standard approach to address this challenge, bioassay-guided fractionation, is often biased toward abundant, rather than bioactive, mixture components. This study evaluated the combination of bioassay-guided fractionation with untargeted metabolite profiling to improve active component identification early in the fractionation process. Key to this methodology was statistical modeling of the integrated biological and chemical data sets (biochemometric analysis). Three data analysis approaches for biochemometric analysis were compared, namely, partial least-squares loading vectors, S-plots, and the selectivity ratio. Extracts from the endophytic fungi Alternaria sp. and Pyrenochaeta sp. with antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus served as test cases. Biochemometric analysis incorporating the selectivity ratio performed best in identifying bioactive ions from these extracts early in the fractionation process, yielding altersetin (3, MIC 0.23 μg/mL) and macrosphelide A (4, MIC 75 μg/mL) as antibacterial constituents from Alternaria sp. and Pyrenochaeta sp., respectively. This study demonstrates the potential of biochemometrics coupled with bioassay-guided fractionation to identify bioactive mixture components. A benefit of this approach is the ability to integrate multiple stages of fractionation and bioassay data into a single analysis.
AB - A central challenge of natural products research is assigning bioactive compounds from complex mixtures. The gold standard approach to address this challenge, bioassay-guided fractionation, is often biased toward abundant, rather than bioactive, mixture components. This study evaluated the combination of bioassay-guided fractionation with untargeted metabolite profiling to improve active component identification early in the fractionation process. Key to this methodology was statistical modeling of the integrated biological and chemical data sets (biochemometric analysis). Three data analysis approaches for biochemometric analysis were compared, namely, partial least-squares loading vectors, S-plots, and the selectivity ratio. Extracts from the endophytic fungi Alternaria sp. and Pyrenochaeta sp. with antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus served as test cases. Biochemometric analysis incorporating the selectivity ratio performed best in identifying bioactive ions from these extracts early in the fractionation process, yielding altersetin (3, MIC 0.23 μg/mL) and macrosphelide A (4, MIC 75 μg/mL) as antibacterial constituents from Alternaria sp. and Pyrenochaeta sp., respectively. This study demonstrates the potential of biochemometrics coupled with bioassay-guided fractionation to identify bioactive mixture components. A benefit of this approach is the ability to integrate multiple stages of fractionation and bioassay data into a single analysis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959419522&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959419522&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b01014
DO - 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b01014
M3 - Article
C2 - 26841051
AN - SCOPUS:84959419522
SN - 0163-3864
VL - 79
SP - 376
EP - 386
JO - Journal of Natural Products
JF - Journal of Natural Products
IS - 2
ER -