Biodefense Spending and Waste: Impact on Public Health Initiatives

Erin Lynne Kelly, Adam Zola, Monica Strzalkowski, Benjamin MacMillan, Gavin MacGreggor-Skinner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

While the threat of bioterrorism carries with it strong emotions of fear and panic, the likelihood-adjusted fatality rates for a horrific bioterror event pale in comparison to that of an infectious disease like influenza. Based on this assumed risk of occurrence, the likelihood-adjusted fatality rate of a bioweapon attack is 900 deaths per year as compared to 36,000 deaths per year for influenza. The FY2016 budget for biodefense was $1.4 million in comparison to $1.2 million for pandemic influenza and emerging diseases. In addition to poor allocation of funds based on actual risk, the biodefense budget lacks government oversight, has poorly defined objectives and unnecessary redundancy. Streamlining the budget and appropriating funds with more emphasis on actual risk would allow an increase in essential areas of public health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)295-300
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Public health
contagious disease
public health
budget
Bioterrorism
death
Redundancy
redundancy
emotion
threat
anxiety
Disease
Influenza
event
lack
Fatality

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Safety Research

Cite this

Kelly, Erin Lynne ; Zola, Adam ; Strzalkowski, Monica ; MacMillan, Benjamin ; MacGreggor-Skinner, Gavin. / Biodefense Spending and Waste : Impact on Public Health Initiatives. In: Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management. 2016 ; Vol. 13, No. 3. pp. 295-300.
@article{3e171fa8e9c9414aa0f45351a6a9d557,
title = "Biodefense Spending and Waste: Impact on Public Health Initiatives",
abstract = "While the threat of bioterrorism carries with it strong emotions of fear and panic, the likelihood-adjusted fatality rates for a horrific bioterror event pale in comparison to that of an infectious disease like influenza. Based on this assumed risk of occurrence, the likelihood-adjusted fatality rate of a bioweapon attack is 900 deaths per year as compared to 36,000 deaths per year for influenza. The FY2016 budget for biodefense was $1.4 million in comparison to $1.2 million for pandemic influenza and emerging diseases. In addition to poor allocation of funds based on actual risk, the biodefense budget lacks government oversight, has poorly defined objectives and unnecessary redundancy. Streamlining the budget and appropriating funds with more emphasis on actual risk would allow an increase in essential areas of public health.",
author = "Kelly, {Erin Lynne} and Adam Zola and Monica Strzalkowski and Benjamin MacMillan and Gavin MacGreggor-Skinner",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/jhsem-2016-0029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "295--300",
journal = "Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management",
issn = "1547-7355",
publisher = "Berkeley Electronic Press",
number = "3",

}

Biodefense Spending and Waste : Impact on Public Health Initiatives. / Kelly, Erin Lynne; Zola, Adam; Strzalkowski, Monica; MacMillan, Benjamin; MacGreggor-Skinner, Gavin.

In: Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, Vol. 13, No. 3, 01.09.2016, p. 295-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biodefense Spending and Waste

T2 - Impact on Public Health Initiatives

AU - Kelly, Erin Lynne

AU - Zola, Adam

AU - Strzalkowski, Monica

AU - MacMillan, Benjamin

AU - MacGreggor-Skinner, Gavin

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - While the threat of bioterrorism carries with it strong emotions of fear and panic, the likelihood-adjusted fatality rates for a horrific bioterror event pale in comparison to that of an infectious disease like influenza. Based on this assumed risk of occurrence, the likelihood-adjusted fatality rate of a bioweapon attack is 900 deaths per year as compared to 36,000 deaths per year for influenza. The FY2016 budget for biodefense was $1.4 million in comparison to $1.2 million for pandemic influenza and emerging diseases. In addition to poor allocation of funds based on actual risk, the biodefense budget lacks government oversight, has poorly defined objectives and unnecessary redundancy. Streamlining the budget and appropriating funds with more emphasis on actual risk would allow an increase in essential areas of public health.

AB - While the threat of bioterrorism carries with it strong emotions of fear and panic, the likelihood-adjusted fatality rates for a horrific bioterror event pale in comparison to that of an infectious disease like influenza. Based on this assumed risk of occurrence, the likelihood-adjusted fatality rate of a bioweapon attack is 900 deaths per year as compared to 36,000 deaths per year for influenza. The FY2016 budget for biodefense was $1.4 million in comparison to $1.2 million for pandemic influenza and emerging diseases. In addition to poor allocation of funds based on actual risk, the biodefense budget lacks government oversight, has poorly defined objectives and unnecessary redundancy. Streamlining the budget and appropriating funds with more emphasis on actual risk would allow an increase in essential areas of public health.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84997354268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84997354268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/jhsem-2016-0029

DO - 10.1515/jhsem-2016-0029

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84997354268

VL - 13

SP - 295

EP - 300

JO - Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management

JF - Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management

SN - 1547-7355

IS - 3

ER -