Bioengineering and bioinformatics summer institutes: Meeting modern challenges in undergraduate summer research

Peter J. Butler, Cheng Dong, Alan J. Snyder, A. Daniel Jones, Erin D. Sheets

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Summer undergraduate research programs in science and engineering facilitate research progress for faculty and provide a close-ended research experience for students, which can prepare them for careers in industry, medicine, and academia. However, ensuring these outcomes is a challenge when the students arrive ill-prepared for substantive research or if projects are ill-defined or impractical for a typical 10-wk summer. We describe how the new Bioengineering and Bioinformatics Summer Institutes (BBSI), developed in response to a call for proposals by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF), provide an impetus for the enhancement of traditional undergraduate research experiences with intense didactic training in particular skills and technologies. Such didactic components provide highly focused and qualified students for summer research with the goal of ensuring increased student satisfaction with research and mentor satisfaction with student productivity. As an example, we focus on our experiences with the Penn State Biomaterials and Bionanotechnology Summer Institute (PSU-BBSI), which trains undergraduates in core technologies in surface characterization, computational modeling, cell biology, and fabrication to prepare them for student-centered research projects in the role of materials in guiding cell biology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-53
Number of pages9
JournalCBE Life Sciences Education
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2008

Fingerprint

Bioengineering
Bioinformatics
Computational Biology
Students
Research
Cytology
student
didactics
biology
Cell Biology
experience
Technology
Engineering research
Biocompatible Materials
Mentors
science
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Medicine
research project
Productivity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

@article{0b9e2d33f8984a3fab9803dcef5edf23,
title = "Bioengineering and bioinformatics summer institutes: Meeting modern challenges in undergraduate summer research",
abstract = "Summer undergraduate research programs in science and engineering facilitate research progress for faculty and provide a close-ended research experience for students, which can prepare them for careers in industry, medicine, and academia. However, ensuring these outcomes is a challenge when the students arrive ill-prepared for substantive research or if projects are ill-defined or impractical for a typical 10-wk summer. We describe how the new Bioengineering and Bioinformatics Summer Institutes (BBSI), developed in response to a call for proposals by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF), provide an impetus for the enhancement of traditional undergraduate research experiences with intense didactic training in particular skills and technologies. Such didactic components provide highly focused and qualified students for summer research with the goal of ensuring increased student satisfaction with research and mentor satisfaction with student productivity. As an example, we focus on our experiences with the Penn State Biomaterials and Bionanotechnology Summer Institute (PSU-BBSI), which trains undergraduates in core technologies in surface characterization, computational modeling, cell biology, and fabrication to prepare them for student-centered research projects in the role of materials in guiding cell biology.",
author = "Butler, {Peter J.} and Cheng Dong and Snyder, {Alan J.} and Jones, {A. Daniel} and Sheets, {Erin D.}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1187/cbe.07-08-0064",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "45--53",
journal = "CBE Life Sciences Education",
issn = "1931-7913",
publisher = "American Society for Cell Biology",
number = "1",

}

Bioengineering and bioinformatics summer institutes : Meeting modern challenges in undergraduate summer research. / Butler, Peter J.; Dong, Cheng; Snyder, Alan J.; Jones, A. Daniel; Sheets, Erin D.

In: CBE Life Sciences Education, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.03.2008, p. 45-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bioengineering and bioinformatics summer institutes

T2 - Meeting modern challenges in undergraduate summer research

AU - Butler, Peter J.

AU - Dong, Cheng

AU - Snyder, Alan J.

AU - Jones, A. Daniel

AU - Sheets, Erin D.

PY - 2008/3/1

Y1 - 2008/3/1

N2 - Summer undergraduate research programs in science and engineering facilitate research progress for faculty and provide a close-ended research experience for students, which can prepare them for careers in industry, medicine, and academia. However, ensuring these outcomes is a challenge when the students arrive ill-prepared for substantive research or if projects are ill-defined or impractical for a typical 10-wk summer. We describe how the new Bioengineering and Bioinformatics Summer Institutes (BBSI), developed in response to a call for proposals by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF), provide an impetus for the enhancement of traditional undergraduate research experiences with intense didactic training in particular skills and technologies. Such didactic components provide highly focused and qualified students for summer research with the goal of ensuring increased student satisfaction with research and mentor satisfaction with student productivity. As an example, we focus on our experiences with the Penn State Biomaterials and Bionanotechnology Summer Institute (PSU-BBSI), which trains undergraduates in core technologies in surface characterization, computational modeling, cell biology, and fabrication to prepare them for student-centered research projects in the role of materials in guiding cell biology.

AB - Summer undergraduate research programs in science and engineering facilitate research progress for faculty and provide a close-ended research experience for students, which can prepare them for careers in industry, medicine, and academia. However, ensuring these outcomes is a challenge when the students arrive ill-prepared for substantive research or if projects are ill-defined or impractical for a typical 10-wk summer. We describe how the new Bioengineering and Bioinformatics Summer Institutes (BBSI), developed in response to a call for proposals by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF), provide an impetus for the enhancement of traditional undergraduate research experiences with intense didactic training in particular skills and technologies. Such didactic components provide highly focused and qualified students for summer research with the goal of ensuring increased student satisfaction with research and mentor satisfaction with student productivity. As an example, we focus on our experiences with the Penn State Biomaterials and Bionanotechnology Summer Institute (PSU-BBSI), which trains undergraduates in core technologies in surface characterization, computational modeling, cell biology, and fabrication to prepare them for student-centered research projects in the role of materials in guiding cell biology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41949126783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41949126783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1187/cbe.07-08-0064

DO - 10.1187/cbe.07-08-0064

M3 - Review article

C2 - 18316807

AN - SCOPUS:41949126783

VL - 7

SP - 45

EP - 53

JO - CBE Life Sciences Education

JF - CBE Life Sciences Education

SN - 1931-7913

IS - 1

ER -