Biomechanics of fracture risk prediction of the hip and spine by quantitative computed tomography

W. C. Hayes, S. J. Piazza, P. K. Zysset

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

196 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this review, engineering concepts provide a framework for reviewing current efforts relating quantitative CT (QCT) measures and bone density and strength. A factor of risk for a particular set of in vivo loading conditions is defined as the ratio of the in vivo loads on the hip or spine to the known in vitro failure loads for these regions. Experiments designed to relate QCT data to failure loads for the proximal femur and vertebrae are remarkably accurate, with coefficients of determination (R2) as high as 0.93 and relative errors as low as 14%. However, when these strength data are compared against estimated in vivo loads, it is apparent, especially for the spine, that loads are very close to those that cause fracture. The findings thus emphasize the importance of incorporating in vivo load estimates in all attempts at fracture risk prediction. They also help explain the relatively poor predictive power of previous approaches to fracture risk prediction, which do not account for the confounding influences of these loads.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages18
JournalRadiologic Clinics of North America
Volume29
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991

Fingerprint

Biomechanical Phenomena
Hip
Spine
Tomography
Bone Density
Femur

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{93d7fdabae1a47deab5ad0352b8a35ac,
title = "Biomechanics of fracture risk prediction of the hip and spine by quantitative computed tomography",
abstract = "In this review, engineering concepts provide a framework for reviewing current efforts relating quantitative CT (QCT) measures and bone density and strength. A factor of risk for a particular set of in vivo loading conditions is defined as the ratio of the in vivo loads on the hip or spine to the known in vitro failure loads for these regions. Experiments designed to relate QCT data to failure loads for the proximal femur and vertebrae are remarkably accurate, with coefficients of determination (R2) as high as 0.93 and relative errors as low as 14{\%}. However, when these strength data are compared against estimated in vivo loads, it is apparent, especially for the spine, that loads are very close to those that cause fracture. The findings thus emphasize the importance of incorporating in vivo load estimates in all attempts at fracture risk prediction. They also help explain the relatively poor predictive power of previous approaches to fracture risk prediction, which do not account for the confounding influences of these loads.",
author = "Hayes, {W. C.} and Piazza, {S. J.} and Zysset, {P. K.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "Radiologic Clinics of North America",
issn = "0033-8389",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Biomechanics of fracture risk prediction of the hip and spine by quantitative computed tomography. / Hayes, W. C.; Piazza, S. J.; Zysset, P. K.

In: Radiologic Clinics of North America, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.01.1991, p. 1-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanics of fracture risk prediction of the hip and spine by quantitative computed tomography

AU - Hayes, W. C.

AU - Piazza, S. J.

AU - Zysset, P. K.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - In this review, engineering concepts provide a framework for reviewing current efforts relating quantitative CT (QCT) measures and bone density and strength. A factor of risk for a particular set of in vivo loading conditions is defined as the ratio of the in vivo loads on the hip or spine to the known in vitro failure loads for these regions. Experiments designed to relate QCT data to failure loads for the proximal femur and vertebrae are remarkably accurate, with coefficients of determination (R2) as high as 0.93 and relative errors as low as 14%. However, when these strength data are compared against estimated in vivo loads, it is apparent, especially for the spine, that loads are very close to those that cause fracture. The findings thus emphasize the importance of incorporating in vivo load estimates in all attempts at fracture risk prediction. They also help explain the relatively poor predictive power of previous approaches to fracture risk prediction, which do not account for the confounding influences of these loads.

AB - In this review, engineering concepts provide a framework for reviewing current efforts relating quantitative CT (QCT) measures and bone density and strength. A factor of risk for a particular set of in vivo loading conditions is defined as the ratio of the in vivo loads on the hip or spine to the known in vitro failure loads for these regions. Experiments designed to relate QCT data to failure loads for the proximal femur and vertebrae are remarkably accurate, with coefficients of determination (R2) as high as 0.93 and relative errors as low as 14%. However, when these strength data are compared against estimated in vivo loads, it is apparent, especially for the spine, that loads are very close to those that cause fracture. The findings thus emphasize the importance of incorporating in vivo load estimates in all attempts at fracture risk prediction. They also help explain the relatively poor predictive power of previous approaches to fracture risk prediction, which do not account for the confounding influences of these loads.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025962641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025962641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

C2 - 1985322

AN - SCOPUS:0025962641

VL - 29

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - Radiologic Clinics of North America

JF - Radiologic Clinics of North America

SN - 0033-8389

IS - 1

ER -