TY - JOUR
T1 - Bistability in Cylindrical Developable Mechanisms through the Principle of Reflection
AU - Butler, Jared
AU - Greenwood, Jacob
AU - Howell, Larry L.
AU - Magleby, Spencer
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation through NSF grant no. 1663345 and the Utah NASA Space Grant Consortium.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/8/1
Y1 - 2021/8/1
N2 - We present a resource for designing bistable developable mechanisms (BDMs) that reach their second stable positions while exterior or interior to a cylindrical surface. Analysis of the necessary conditions to create extramobile and intramobile cylindrical BDMs is conducted through a series of three tests. These tests contain elements of both existing and new mechanism design tools, including a novel graphical method for identifying stable positions of linkages using a single dominant torsional spring, called the principle of reflection. These tests are applied to all possible mechanism cases and configurations to identify why certain configurations will always, sometimes, or never be a BDM. Two tables summarize these results as a guide when designing extramobile and intramobile BDMs. The results are compared and demonstrated with a numerical simulation of 30,000+ mechanisms, including several example mechanisms that illustrate the concepts discussed in the work. Discussion is then provided on the implication of these results.
AB - We present a resource for designing bistable developable mechanisms (BDMs) that reach their second stable positions while exterior or interior to a cylindrical surface. Analysis of the necessary conditions to create extramobile and intramobile cylindrical BDMs is conducted through a series of three tests. These tests contain elements of both existing and new mechanism design tools, including a novel graphical method for identifying stable positions of linkages using a single dominant torsional spring, called the principle of reflection. These tests are applied to all possible mechanism cases and configurations to identify why certain configurations will always, sometimes, or never be a BDM. Two tables summarize these results as a guide when designing extramobile and intramobile BDMs. The results are compared and demonstrated with a numerical simulation of 30,000+ mechanisms, including several example mechanisms that illustrate the concepts discussed in the work. Discussion is then provided on the implication of these results.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100570579&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100570579&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/1.4049655
DO - 10.1115/1.4049655
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85100570579
SN - 1050-0472
VL - 143
JO - Journal of Mechanical Design - Transactions of the ASME
JF - Journal of Mechanical Design - Transactions of the ASME
IS - 8
M1 - 083302
ER -