Black feminist reflections on Charles Mills’s “intersecting contracts”

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This critical commentary is presented in two parts. The first section, “Intersecting Contracts: Conceptual Interventions and Aims,” provides an overview of Mills’s analysis of the racia-sexual contract and the divergent positions of white men (full contractors and persons), white women (subcontractors with real, though inferior power), nonwhite men (subcontractors, though not on equal standing with white women because “race trumps gender”), and nonwhite women (nonpersons and noncontractors at the bottom of the structure and dominated by all three of the aforementioned groups). The second section, “Privilege and Patriarchy: Does ‘Race Generally Trump Gender’?,” shows how Mills offers an uneven representation of critiques presented by women of color theorists. For example, he focuses on the critiques of white women (and white feminism), emphasizing the asymmetry between white women and nonwhite men as well as the tensions between white women and nonwhite women. This article also problematizes Mills’s claim that “race generally trumps gender” and argues for a more nuanced analysis of nonwhite men’s participation in patriarchy and privilege.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-28
Number of pages10
JournalCritical Philosophy of Race
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

subcontractor
patriarchy
privilege
gender
feminism
asymmetry
participation
human being
Group
Patriarchy
Privilege
Feminism
Person
Sexual
Theorists
Participation
Women of Color
Asymmetry

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anthropology
  • Philosophy

Cite this

@article{a70a5388d7414b53bf2ef2d53adf65ef,
title = "Black feminist reflections on Charles Mills’s “intersecting contracts”",
abstract = "This critical commentary is presented in two parts. The first section, “Intersecting Contracts: Conceptual Interventions and Aims,” provides an overview of Mills’s analysis of the racia-sexual contract and the divergent positions of white men (full contractors and persons), white women (subcontractors with real, though inferior power), nonwhite men (subcontractors, though not on equal standing with white women because “race trumps gender”), and nonwhite women (nonpersons and noncontractors at the bottom of the structure and dominated by all three of the aforementioned groups). The second section, “Privilege and Patriarchy: Does ‘Race Generally Trump Gender’?,” shows how Mills offers an uneven representation of critiques presented by women of color theorists. For example, he focuses on the critiques of white women (and white feminism), emphasizing the asymmetry between white women and nonwhite men as well as the tensions between white women and nonwhite women. This article also problematizes Mills’s claim that “race generally trumps gender” and argues for a more nuanced analysis of nonwhite men’s participation in patriarchy and privilege.",
author = "Kathryn Gines",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5325/critphilrace.5.1.0019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "19--28",
journal = "Critical Philosophy of Race",
issn = "2165-8684",
publisher = "Penn State University Press",
number = "1",

}

Black feminist reflections on Charles Mills’s “intersecting contracts”. / Gines, Kathryn.

In: Critical Philosophy of Race, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 19-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Black feminist reflections on Charles Mills’s “intersecting contracts”

AU - Gines, Kathryn

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - This critical commentary is presented in two parts. The first section, “Intersecting Contracts: Conceptual Interventions and Aims,” provides an overview of Mills’s analysis of the racia-sexual contract and the divergent positions of white men (full contractors and persons), white women (subcontractors with real, though inferior power), nonwhite men (subcontractors, though not on equal standing with white women because “race trumps gender”), and nonwhite women (nonpersons and noncontractors at the bottom of the structure and dominated by all three of the aforementioned groups). The second section, “Privilege and Patriarchy: Does ‘Race Generally Trump Gender’?,” shows how Mills offers an uneven representation of critiques presented by women of color theorists. For example, he focuses on the critiques of white women (and white feminism), emphasizing the asymmetry between white women and nonwhite men as well as the tensions between white women and nonwhite women. This article also problematizes Mills’s claim that “race generally trumps gender” and argues for a more nuanced analysis of nonwhite men’s participation in patriarchy and privilege.

AB - This critical commentary is presented in two parts. The first section, “Intersecting Contracts: Conceptual Interventions and Aims,” provides an overview of Mills’s analysis of the racia-sexual contract and the divergent positions of white men (full contractors and persons), white women (subcontractors with real, though inferior power), nonwhite men (subcontractors, though not on equal standing with white women because “race trumps gender”), and nonwhite women (nonpersons and noncontractors at the bottom of the structure and dominated by all three of the aforementioned groups). The second section, “Privilege and Patriarchy: Does ‘Race Generally Trump Gender’?,” shows how Mills offers an uneven representation of critiques presented by women of color theorists. For example, he focuses on the critiques of white women (and white feminism), emphasizing the asymmetry between white women and nonwhite men as well as the tensions between white women and nonwhite women. This article also problematizes Mills’s claim that “race generally trumps gender” and argues for a more nuanced analysis of nonwhite men’s participation in patriarchy and privilege.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035789595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035789595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5325/critphilrace.5.1.0019

DO - 10.5325/critphilrace.5.1.0019

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85035789595

VL - 5

SP - 19

EP - 28

JO - Critical Philosophy of Race

JF - Critical Philosophy of Race

SN - 2165-8684

IS - 1

ER -