Bluff erosion hazards and construction setbacks on the great lakes coasts of the United States: A review

Anthony M. Foyle, Sean D. Rafferty

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Approximately 34 million people live within the North American Great Lakes Basin: ~32% of the Canadian population and ~8% of the US population. About 12 million of those people live on the Lake Erie coast of New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Ontario. Unconsolidated Quaternary-age bluffs ranging in height from 1.5-55m dominate along 73km of the 123km Pennsylvania coast, and long-term records show that slow-continuous erosion is pervasive, and that rapid (but locally catastrophic) bluff failure is relatively infrequent. As a result, ~90% of the Lake Erie bluff coast in Pennsylvania is designated by the state as a Bluff Recession Hazard Area wherein regulations limit risky bluff-top development. A high degree of variability (space, time) in bluff-retreat rates exists because stratigraphy and geotechnical properties show variation due to materials, depositional geometries, post-depositional processes, hydrology, and anthropogenic influences. This makes it difficult to forecast the magnitude, frequency, and location of larger bluff-failure events and consequently makes pre-emptive mitigation efforts more challenging. Two methods are commonly used to establish coastal construction setbacks on Great Lakes bluff coasts: (i) the “AARRxT” method which uses a simple linear extrapolation of past bluff-change rates to estimate the future bluff position and the setback line for a building being constructed today; and (ii) the “AARRxT+” method which uses a similar approach but incorporates a slope stability factor and/or a relocation buffer. The limitation is that these deterministic methods assume that rates and magnitudes of processes driving change in the past will not change in the future, and they create the impression that bluff change is linear and more predictable than it is in reality. At the property and municipality scales, this makes hazard planning for continuous and catastrophic bluff failure particularly challenging.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationWIT Transactions on the Built Environment
PublisherWITPress
Pages149-160
Number of pages12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Publication series

NameWIT Transactions on the Built Environment
Volume173
ISSN (Print)1743-3509
ISSN (Electronic)1746-4498

Fingerprint

Coastal zones
Lakes
Erosion
Hazards
Stratigraphy
Relocation
Slope stability
Hydrology
Extrapolation
Catchments
Planning
Geometry
Coast
Hazard
Great Lakes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Architecture
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Automotive Engineering
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Transportation
  • Safety Research
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Foyle, A. M., & Rafferty, S. D. (2017). Bluff erosion hazards and construction setbacks on the great lakes coasts of the United States: A review. In WIT Transactions on the Built Environment (pp. 149-160). (WIT Transactions on the Built Environment; Vol. 173). WITPress. https://doi.org/10.2495/DMAN170151
Foyle, Anthony M. ; Rafferty, Sean D. / Bluff erosion hazards and construction setbacks on the great lakes coasts of the United States : A review. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment. WITPress, 2017. pp. 149-160 (WIT Transactions on the Built Environment).
@inbook{98eb8d5455f34ff29fd34897000ecc18,
title = "Bluff erosion hazards and construction setbacks on the great lakes coasts of the United States: A review",
abstract = "Approximately 34 million people live within the North American Great Lakes Basin: ~32{\%} of the Canadian population and ~8{\%} of the US population. About 12 million of those people live on the Lake Erie coast of New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Ontario. Unconsolidated Quaternary-age bluffs ranging in height from 1.5-55m dominate along 73km of the 123km Pennsylvania coast, and long-term records show that slow-continuous erosion is pervasive, and that rapid (but locally catastrophic) bluff failure is relatively infrequent. As a result, ~90{\%} of the Lake Erie bluff coast in Pennsylvania is designated by the state as a Bluff Recession Hazard Area wherein regulations limit risky bluff-top development. A high degree of variability (space, time) in bluff-retreat rates exists because stratigraphy and geotechnical properties show variation due to materials, depositional geometries, post-depositional processes, hydrology, and anthropogenic influences. This makes it difficult to forecast the magnitude, frequency, and location of larger bluff-failure events and consequently makes pre-emptive mitigation efforts more challenging. Two methods are commonly used to establish coastal construction setbacks on Great Lakes bluff coasts: (i) the “AARRxT” method which uses a simple linear extrapolation of past bluff-change rates to estimate the future bluff position and the setback line for a building being constructed today; and (ii) the “AARRxT+” method which uses a similar approach but incorporates a slope stability factor and/or a relocation buffer. The limitation is that these deterministic methods assume that rates and magnitudes of processes driving change in the past will not change in the future, and they create the impression that bluff change is linear and more predictable than it is in reality. At the property and municipality scales, this makes hazard planning for continuous and catastrophic bluff failure particularly challenging.",
author = "Foyle, {Anthony M.} and Rafferty, {Sean D.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2495/DMAN170151",
language = "English (US)",
series = "WIT Transactions on the Built Environment",
publisher = "WITPress",
pages = "149--160",
booktitle = "WIT Transactions on the Built Environment",

}

Foyle, AM & Rafferty, SD 2017, Bluff erosion hazards and construction setbacks on the great lakes coasts of the United States: A review. in WIT Transactions on the Built Environment. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, vol. 173, WITPress, pp. 149-160. https://doi.org/10.2495/DMAN170151

Bluff erosion hazards and construction setbacks on the great lakes coasts of the United States : A review. / Foyle, Anthony M.; Rafferty, Sean D.

WIT Transactions on the Built Environment. WITPress, 2017. p. 149-160 (WIT Transactions on the Built Environment; Vol. 173).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Bluff erosion hazards and construction setbacks on the great lakes coasts of the United States

T2 - A review

AU - Foyle, Anthony M.

AU - Rafferty, Sean D.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Approximately 34 million people live within the North American Great Lakes Basin: ~32% of the Canadian population and ~8% of the US population. About 12 million of those people live on the Lake Erie coast of New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Ontario. Unconsolidated Quaternary-age bluffs ranging in height from 1.5-55m dominate along 73km of the 123km Pennsylvania coast, and long-term records show that slow-continuous erosion is pervasive, and that rapid (but locally catastrophic) bluff failure is relatively infrequent. As a result, ~90% of the Lake Erie bluff coast in Pennsylvania is designated by the state as a Bluff Recession Hazard Area wherein regulations limit risky bluff-top development. A high degree of variability (space, time) in bluff-retreat rates exists because stratigraphy and geotechnical properties show variation due to materials, depositional geometries, post-depositional processes, hydrology, and anthropogenic influences. This makes it difficult to forecast the magnitude, frequency, and location of larger bluff-failure events and consequently makes pre-emptive mitigation efforts more challenging. Two methods are commonly used to establish coastal construction setbacks on Great Lakes bluff coasts: (i) the “AARRxT” method which uses a simple linear extrapolation of past bluff-change rates to estimate the future bluff position and the setback line for a building being constructed today; and (ii) the “AARRxT+” method which uses a similar approach but incorporates a slope stability factor and/or a relocation buffer. The limitation is that these deterministic methods assume that rates and magnitudes of processes driving change in the past will not change in the future, and they create the impression that bluff change is linear and more predictable than it is in reality. At the property and municipality scales, this makes hazard planning for continuous and catastrophic bluff failure particularly challenging.

AB - Approximately 34 million people live within the North American Great Lakes Basin: ~32% of the Canadian population and ~8% of the US population. About 12 million of those people live on the Lake Erie coast of New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Ontario. Unconsolidated Quaternary-age bluffs ranging in height from 1.5-55m dominate along 73km of the 123km Pennsylvania coast, and long-term records show that slow-continuous erosion is pervasive, and that rapid (but locally catastrophic) bluff failure is relatively infrequent. As a result, ~90% of the Lake Erie bluff coast in Pennsylvania is designated by the state as a Bluff Recession Hazard Area wherein regulations limit risky bluff-top development. A high degree of variability (space, time) in bluff-retreat rates exists because stratigraphy and geotechnical properties show variation due to materials, depositional geometries, post-depositional processes, hydrology, and anthropogenic influences. This makes it difficult to forecast the magnitude, frequency, and location of larger bluff-failure events and consequently makes pre-emptive mitigation efforts more challenging. Two methods are commonly used to establish coastal construction setbacks on Great Lakes bluff coasts: (i) the “AARRxT” method which uses a simple linear extrapolation of past bluff-change rates to estimate the future bluff position and the setback line for a building being constructed today; and (ii) the “AARRxT+” method which uses a similar approach but incorporates a slope stability factor and/or a relocation buffer. The limitation is that these deterministic methods assume that rates and magnitudes of processes driving change in the past will not change in the future, and they create the impression that bluff change is linear and more predictable than it is in reality. At the property and municipality scales, this makes hazard planning for continuous and catastrophic bluff failure particularly challenging.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031280722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031280722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2495/DMAN170151

DO - 10.2495/DMAN170151

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85031280722

T3 - WIT Transactions on the Built Environment

SP - 149

EP - 160

BT - WIT Transactions on the Built Environment

PB - WITPress

ER -

Foyle AM, Rafferty SD. Bluff erosion hazards and construction setbacks on the great lakes coasts of the United States: A review. In WIT Transactions on the Built Environment. WITPress. 2017. p. 149-160. (WIT Transactions on the Built Environment). https://doi.org/10.2495/DMAN170151