Body-goal variability mapping in an aiming task

Joseph Paul Cusumano, Paola Cesari

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Given the number of joints and muscles in the human body, there are typically an infinite number of ways to perform the same action, a feature of directed movements known as equifinality (Bernstein, The coordination and regulation of movements, Oxford, Pergamon, 1967). Here we present a new type of performance analysis based on the idea of a body-goal variability mapping. We show how this mapping arises naturally from the idea of a goal function that theoretically defines a task and, in the presence of equifinality, determines the set of all possible task solution strategies, the goal equivalent manifold (GEM). The approach also yields estimates of the sensitivity of goal-level errors to body-level perturbations, and we derive a general formula expressing the relationship between the two. We apply these ideas to the analysis of redundant kinematic data from subjects performing an aiming task carried out with and without a laser pointer. It is shown that in order to characterize performance one must consider two factors in addition to the body variability: first, the degree of alignment between body variability and the GEM; and second, the sensitivity parameters that control the degree to which goal-relevant body variability is amplified at the target. Both of these factors can be computed using the estimated body-goal mapping. We show that the performance for three conditions involving two different nominal postures and two different sensory conditions (laser/no laser) can be classified by examining the clustering of data in an orientation- sensitivity parameter plane associated with the map.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)367-379
Number of pages13
JournalBiological Cybernetics
Volume94
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2006

Fingerprint

Lasers
Posture
Human Body
Biomechanical Phenomena
Cluster Analysis
Muscle
Kinematics
Joints
Muscles

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biotechnology
  • Computer Science(all)

Cite this

Cusumano, Joseph Paul ; Cesari, Paola. / Body-goal variability mapping in an aiming task. In: Biological Cybernetics. 2006 ; Vol. 94, No. 5. pp. 367-379.
@article{e1d60327a8b04dea8663faca473b999b,
title = "Body-goal variability mapping in an aiming task",
abstract = "Given the number of joints and muscles in the human body, there are typically an infinite number of ways to perform the same action, a feature of directed movements known as equifinality (Bernstein, The coordination and regulation of movements, Oxford, Pergamon, 1967). Here we present a new type of performance analysis based on the idea of a body-goal variability mapping. We show how this mapping arises naturally from the idea of a goal function that theoretically defines a task and, in the presence of equifinality, determines the set of all possible task solution strategies, the goal equivalent manifold (GEM). The approach also yields estimates of the sensitivity of goal-level errors to body-level perturbations, and we derive a general formula expressing the relationship between the two. We apply these ideas to the analysis of redundant kinematic data from subjects performing an aiming task carried out with and without a laser pointer. It is shown that in order to characterize performance one must consider two factors in addition to the body variability: first, the degree of alignment between body variability and the GEM; and second, the sensitivity parameters that control the degree to which goal-relevant body variability is amplified at the target. Both of these factors can be computed using the estimated body-goal mapping. We show that the performance for three conditions involving two different nominal postures and two different sensory conditions (laser/no laser) can be classified by examining the clustering of data in an orientation- sensitivity parameter plane associated with the map.",
author = "Cusumano, {Joseph Paul} and Paola Cesari",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00422-006-0052-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "367--379",
journal = "Biological Cybernetics",
issn = "0340-1200",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "5",

}

Body-goal variability mapping in an aiming task. / Cusumano, Joseph Paul; Cesari, Paola.

In: Biological Cybernetics, Vol. 94, No. 5, 01.05.2006, p. 367-379.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Body-goal variability mapping in an aiming task

AU - Cusumano, Joseph Paul

AU - Cesari, Paola

PY - 2006/5/1

Y1 - 2006/5/1

N2 - Given the number of joints and muscles in the human body, there are typically an infinite number of ways to perform the same action, a feature of directed movements known as equifinality (Bernstein, The coordination and regulation of movements, Oxford, Pergamon, 1967). Here we present a new type of performance analysis based on the idea of a body-goal variability mapping. We show how this mapping arises naturally from the idea of a goal function that theoretically defines a task and, in the presence of equifinality, determines the set of all possible task solution strategies, the goal equivalent manifold (GEM). The approach also yields estimates of the sensitivity of goal-level errors to body-level perturbations, and we derive a general formula expressing the relationship between the two. We apply these ideas to the analysis of redundant kinematic data from subjects performing an aiming task carried out with and without a laser pointer. It is shown that in order to characterize performance one must consider two factors in addition to the body variability: first, the degree of alignment between body variability and the GEM; and second, the sensitivity parameters that control the degree to which goal-relevant body variability is amplified at the target. Both of these factors can be computed using the estimated body-goal mapping. We show that the performance for three conditions involving two different nominal postures and two different sensory conditions (laser/no laser) can be classified by examining the clustering of data in an orientation- sensitivity parameter plane associated with the map.

AB - Given the number of joints and muscles in the human body, there are typically an infinite number of ways to perform the same action, a feature of directed movements known as equifinality (Bernstein, The coordination and regulation of movements, Oxford, Pergamon, 1967). Here we present a new type of performance analysis based on the idea of a body-goal variability mapping. We show how this mapping arises naturally from the idea of a goal function that theoretically defines a task and, in the presence of equifinality, determines the set of all possible task solution strategies, the goal equivalent manifold (GEM). The approach also yields estimates of the sensitivity of goal-level errors to body-level perturbations, and we derive a general formula expressing the relationship between the two. We apply these ideas to the analysis of redundant kinematic data from subjects performing an aiming task carried out with and without a laser pointer. It is shown that in order to characterize performance one must consider two factors in addition to the body variability: first, the degree of alignment between body variability and the GEM; and second, the sensitivity parameters that control the degree to which goal-relevant body variability is amplified at the target. Both of these factors can be computed using the estimated body-goal mapping. We show that the performance for three conditions involving two different nominal postures and two different sensory conditions (laser/no laser) can be classified by examining the clustering of data in an orientation- sensitivity parameter plane associated with the map.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646004308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646004308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00422-006-0052-1

DO - 10.1007/s00422-006-0052-1

M3 - Review article

C2 - 16501988

AN - SCOPUS:33646004308

VL - 94

SP - 367

EP - 379

JO - Biological Cybernetics

JF - Biological Cybernetics

SN - 0340-1200

IS - 5

ER -