BOOT CAMP PRISONS AND RECIDIVISM IN EIGHT STATES

DORIS LAYTON MACKENZIE; ROBERT BRAME; DAVID McDOWALL; CLAIRE SOURYAL

doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1995.tb01181.x

BOOT CAMP PRISONS AND RECIDIVISM IN EIGHT STATES

DORIS LAYTON MACKENZIE, ROBERT BRAME, DAVID McDOWALL, CLAIRE SOURYAL

Sociology and Criminology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

82 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recidivism reduction is an important objective of many correctional programs. Recent survey data suggest that boot camp prisons (also referred to as shock incarceration programs) are no exception. In this study, we examine recidivism among boot camp completers in eight states during community supervision. We then assess these recidivism patterns in light of how one or more comparison groups in each state perform. For most states, two or more recidivism measures (such as arrest and revocation) are employed. The analysis suggests that those who complete boot camp do not inevitably perform either better or worse than their comparison group counterparts. Rather, program effectiveness has to be judged on a state‐bystate basis.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	327-358
Number of pages	32
Journal	Criminology
Volume	33
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1995.tb01181.x
State	Published - Aug 1995

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Law

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1745-9125.1995.tb01181.x

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'BOOT CAMP PRISONS AND RECIDIVISM IN EIGHT STATES'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{1ff2d0b0b8984499bf87359a03d0adab,

title = "BOOT CAMP PRISONS AND RECIDIVISM IN EIGHT STATES",

abstract = "Recidivism reduction is an important objective of many correctional programs. Recent survey data suggest that boot camp prisons (also referred to as shock incarceration programs) are no exception. In this study, we examine recidivism among boot camp completers in eight states during community supervision. We then assess these recidivism patterns in light of how one or more comparison groups in each state perform. For most states, two or more recidivism measures (such as arrest and revocation) are employed. The analysis suggests that those who complete boot camp do not inevitably perform either better or worse than their comparison group counterparts. Rather, program effectiveness has to be judged on a state‐bystate basis.",

author = "MACKENZIE, {DORIS LAYTON} and ROBERT BRAME and DAVID McDOWALL and CLAIRE SOURYAL",

year = "1995",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1111/j.1745-9125.1995.tb01181.x",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "33",

pages = "327--358",

journal = "Criminology",

issn = "0011-1384",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - BOOT CAMP PRISONS AND RECIDIVISM IN EIGHT STATES

AU - MACKENZIE, DORIS LAYTON

AU - BRAME, ROBERT

AU - McDOWALL, DAVID

AU - SOURYAL, CLAIRE

PY - 1995/8

Y1 - 1995/8

N2 - Recidivism reduction is an important objective of many correctional programs. Recent survey data suggest that boot camp prisons (also referred to as shock incarceration programs) are no exception. In this study, we examine recidivism among boot camp completers in eight states during community supervision. We then assess these recidivism patterns in light of how one or more comparison groups in each state perform. For most states, two or more recidivism measures (such as arrest and revocation) are employed. The analysis suggests that those who complete boot camp do not inevitably perform either better or worse than their comparison group counterparts. Rather, program effectiveness has to be judged on a state‐bystate basis.

AB - Recidivism reduction is an important objective of many correctional programs. Recent survey data suggest that boot camp prisons (also referred to as shock incarceration programs) are no exception. In this study, we examine recidivism among boot camp completers in eight states during community supervision. We then assess these recidivism patterns in light of how one or more comparison groups in each state perform. For most states, two or more recidivism measures (such as arrest and revocation) are employed. The analysis suggests that those who complete boot camp do not inevitably perform either better or worse than their comparison group counterparts. Rather, program effectiveness has to be judged on a state‐bystate basis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984376831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984376831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1995.tb01181.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1995.tb01181.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84984376831

VL - 33

SP - 327

EP - 358

JO - Criminology

JF - Criminology

SN - 0011-1384

IS - 3

ER -