Boundary conditions, temperatures, and stress intensity factors under arbitrary thermal transients via the inverse route

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A common threat to components is thermal shock from operational steady-state or transient thermal-states; an analysis of this type of problem ultimately requires the determination of stress intensity factors (SIF). For direct problems where all boundary conditions are known, the procedure is relatively straightforward and mathematically tractable. Although more practical from a measurement standpoint, the inverse problem where the boundary conditions must be determined from remotely determined temperature and/or flux data is ill-posed and inherently sensitive to errors in the data. Despite these difficulties, the inverse problem can be readily solved using a least-squares determination of polynomial coefficients based on a generalized direct solution to the Heat Equation. Once the unknown surface temperature history is determined, the resulting polynomial can also used with the generalized direct solution to determine the temperature and stress distributions as a function of time. For a semi-infinite slab with both edge- and surface-cracks, excellent agreement was seen with known solutions when this method was employed. Given the versatility of the polynomial solutions advocated, the method appears well suited for many thermal scenarios provided the analysis is restricted to the time interval used to determine the polynomial and the thermophysical properties that do not vary with temperature. The method can also be implemented as part of a finite-element solution for more complex geometries when closed-form solutions do not exist.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)625-629
Number of pages5
JournalNuclear Engineering and Design
Volume241
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2011

Fingerprint

stress intensity factors
Stress intensity factors
boundary condition
routes
Boundary conditions
boundary conditions
inverse problem
polynomials
Polynomials
temperature
Inverse problems
Temperature
slab
crack
surface temperature
edge cracks
geometry
surface cracks
thermal shock
thermophysical properties

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

@article{d4692c1b64514b148192c50e20344918,
title = "Boundary conditions, temperatures, and stress intensity factors under arbitrary thermal transients via the inverse route",
abstract = "A common threat to components is thermal shock from operational steady-state or transient thermal-states; an analysis of this type of problem ultimately requires the determination of stress intensity factors (SIF). For direct problems where all boundary conditions are known, the procedure is relatively straightforward and mathematically tractable. Although more practical from a measurement standpoint, the inverse problem where the boundary conditions must be determined from remotely determined temperature and/or flux data is ill-posed and inherently sensitive to errors in the data. Despite these difficulties, the inverse problem can be readily solved using a least-squares determination of polynomial coefficients based on a generalized direct solution to the Heat Equation. Once the unknown surface temperature history is determined, the resulting polynomial can also used with the generalized direct solution to determine the temperature and stress distributions as a function of time. For a semi-infinite slab with both edge- and surface-cracks, excellent agreement was seen with known solutions when this method was employed. Given the versatility of the polynomial solutions advocated, the method appears well suited for many thermal scenarios provided the analysis is restricted to the time interval used to determine the polynomial and the thermophysical properties that do not vary with temperature. The method can also be implemented as part of a finite-element solution for more complex geometries when closed-form solutions do not exist.",
author = "Segall, {Albert Eliot} and J. Meeker",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.07.034",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "241",
pages = "625--629",
journal = "Nuclear Engineering and Design",
issn = "0029-5493",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

Boundary conditions, temperatures, and stress intensity factors under arbitrary thermal transients via the inverse route. / Segall, Albert Eliot; Meeker, J.

In: Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 241, No. 3, 01.03.2011, p. 625-629.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Boundary conditions, temperatures, and stress intensity factors under arbitrary thermal transients via the inverse route

AU - Segall, Albert Eliot

AU - Meeker, J.

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - A common threat to components is thermal shock from operational steady-state or transient thermal-states; an analysis of this type of problem ultimately requires the determination of stress intensity factors (SIF). For direct problems where all boundary conditions are known, the procedure is relatively straightforward and mathematically tractable. Although more practical from a measurement standpoint, the inverse problem where the boundary conditions must be determined from remotely determined temperature and/or flux data is ill-posed and inherently sensitive to errors in the data. Despite these difficulties, the inverse problem can be readily solved using a least-squares determination of polynomial coefficients based on a generalized direct solution to the Heat Equation. Once the unknown surface temperature history is determined, the resulting polynomial can also used with the generalized direct solution to determine the temperature and stress distributions as a function of time. For a semi-infinite slab with both edge- and surface-cracks, excellent agreement was seen with known solutions when this method was employed. Given the versatility of the polynomial solutions advocated, the method appears well suited for many thermal scenarios provided the analysis is restricted to the time interval used to determine the polynomial and the thermophysical properties that do not vary with temperature. The method can also be implemented as part of a finite-element solution for more complex geometries when closed-form solutions do not exist.

AB - A common threat to components is thermal shock from operational steady-state or transient thermal-states; an analysis of this type of problem ultimately requires the determination of stress intensity factors (SIF). For direct problems where all boundary conditions are known, the procedure is relatively straightforward and mathematically tractable. Although more practical from a measurement standpoint, the inverse problem where the boundary conditions must be determined from remotely determined temperature and/or flux data is ill-posed and inherently sensitive to errors in the data. Despite these difficulties, the inverse problem can be readily solved using a least-squares determination of polynomial coefficients based on a generalized direct solution to the Heat Equation. Once the unknown surface temperature history is determined, the resulting polynomial can also used with the generalized direct solution to determine the temperature and stress distributions as a function of time. For a semi-infinite slab with both edge- and surface-cracks, excellent agreement was seen with known solutions when this method was employed. Given the versatility of the polynomial solutions advocated, the method appears well suited for many thermal scenarios provided the analysis is restricted to the time interval used to determine the polynomial and the thermophysical properties that do not vary with temperature. The method can also be implemented as part of a finite-element solution for more complex geometries when closed-form solutions do not exist.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952573183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952573183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.07.034

DO - 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.07.034

M3 - Article

VL - 241

SP - 625

EP - 629

JO - Nuclear Engineering and Design

JF - Nuclear Engineering and Design

SN - 0029-5493

IS - 3

ER -