Breastfeeding, Rhetoric, and the Politics of Feminism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article provides an argument for approaching the breast-bottle controversy within feminism from a rhetorical perspective, which focuses attention on how the controversy has been framed in relation to the value of medical evidence. Using the concept of rhetorical situation, the analysis demonstrates that feminists who devalue medical evidence of the health benefits of breastfeeding tend to see a breastfeeding-friendly culture, while those who see evidence for the health benefits of breastfeeding tend to see a culture friendlier to bottle-feeding. The consequences of these divergent views are significant, as the two groups differ significantly concerning whether culture or biology are changeable elements of the current circumstance that disadvantages mothers. The rhetorical perspective encourages feminists to find common ground by understanding how the staging of evidence and argument contributes to theoretical stalemates that impede all women from benefiting from political reframing of the breast-bottle debate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)330-344
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Women, Politics and Policy
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2013

Fingerprint

feminism
rhetoric
politics
evidence
staging
health
biology
Values
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gender Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{663e04d208b6420c8299d022a2d7356e,
title = "Breastfeeding, Rhetoric, and the Politics of Feminism",
abstract = "This article provides an argument for approaching the breast-bottle controversy within feminism from a rhetorical perspective, which focuses attention on how the controversy has been framed in relation to the value of medical evidence. Using the concept of rhetorical situation, the analysis demonstrates that feminists who devalue medical evidence of the health benefits of breastfeeding tend to see a breastfeeding-friendly culture, while those who see evidence for the health benefits of breastfeeding tend to see a culture friendlier to bottle-feeding. The consequences of these divergent views are significant, as the two groups differ significantly concerning whether culture or biology are changeable elements of the current circumstance that disadvantages mothers. The rhetorical perspective encourages feminists to find common ground by understanding how the staging of evidence and argument contributes to theoretical stalemates that impede all women from benefiting from political reframing of the breast-bottle debate.",
author = "Hausman, {Bernice L.}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/1554477X.2013.835673",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "330--344",
journal = "Journal of Women, Politics and Policy",
issn = "1554-477X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Breastfeeding, Rhetoric, and the Politics of Feminism. / Hausman, Bernice L.

In: Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, Vol. 34, No. 4, 01.10.2013, p. 330-344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Breastfeeding, Rhetoric, and the Politics of Feminism

AU - Hausman, Bernice L.

PY - 2013/10/1

Y1 - 2013/10/1

N2 - This article provides an argument for approaching the breast-bottle controversy within feminism from a rhetorical perspective, which focuses attention on how the controversy has been framed in relation to the value of medical evidence. Using the concept of rhetorical situation, the analysis demonstrates that feminists who devalue medical evidence of the health benefits of breastfeeding tend to see a breastfeeding-friendly culture, while those who see evidence for the health benefits of breastfeeding tend to see a culture friendlier to bottle-feeding. The consequences of these divergent views are significant, as the two groups differ significantly concerning whether culture or biology are changeable elements of the current circumstance that disadvantages mothers. The rhetorical perspective encourages feminists to find common ground by understanding how the staging of evidence and argument contributes to theoretical stalemates that impede all women from benefiting from political reframing of the breast-bottle debate.

AB - This article provides an argument for approaching the breast-bottle controversy within feminism from a rhetorical perspective, which focuses attention on how the controversy has been framed in relation to the value of medical evidence. Using the concept of rhetorical situation, the analysis demonstrates that feminists who devalue medical evidence of the health benefits of breastfeeding tend to see a breastfeeding-friendly culture, while those who see evidence for the health benefits of breastfeeding tend to see a culture friendlier to bottle-feeding. The consequences of these divergent views are significant, as the two groups differ significantly concerning whether culture or biology are changeable elements of the current circumstance that disadvantages mothers. The rhetorical perspective encourages feminists to find common ground by understanding how the staging of evidence and argument contributes to theoretical stalemates that impede all women from benefiting from political reframing of the breast-bottle debate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887971507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887971507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1554477X.2013.835673

DO - 10.1080/1554477X.2013.835673

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84887971507

VL - 34

SP - 330

EP - 344

JO - Journal of Women, Politics and Policy

JF - Journal of Women, Politics and Policy

SN - 1554-477X

IS - 4

ER -