Brief communication: Sex estimation from modern American humeri and femora, accounting for sample variance structure

Jesper L. Boldsen, George R. Milner, Søren K. Boldsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives A new procedure for skeletal sex estimation based on humeral and femoral dimensions is presented, based on skeletons from the United States. The approach specifically addresses the problem that arises from a lack of variance homogeneity between the sexes, taking into account prior information about the sample's sex ratio, if known. Material and methods Three measurements useful for estimating the sex of adult skeletons, the humeral and femoral head diameters and the humeral epicondylar breadth, were collected from 258 Americans born between 1893 and 1980 who died within the past several decades. Results For measurements individually and collectively, the probabilities of being one sex or the other were generated for samples with an equal distribution of males and females, taking into account the variance structure of the original measurements. The combination providing the best estimates correctly classifies 88.3% of the skeletons, with 10.8% considered unknown and 0.9% assigned to the wrong sex. Discussion Probabilities of correct assignments are a better means of categorizing individuals as male or female than the sectioning points commonly used in skeletal studies. That is because it is possible to estimate the observer's certainty that the individual represented by measured bones was one sex or the other. A computer program is available that simultaneously considers samples of unequal sex composition. It is useful when there is contextual information available about the nature of skeletal samples (e.g., a mass burial from a battle or genocide).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)745-750
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology
Volume158
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Humerus
Femur
communication
Skeleton
sex ratio
Thigh
genocide
data processing program
available information
funeral
Genocide
Humeral Head
Burial
Sex Ratio
lack
Software
Bone and Bones

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anatomy
  • Anthropology

Cite this

@article{65b3015355ab46d18c7e7272cd803642,
title = "Brief communication: Sex estimation from modern American humeri and femora, accounting for sample variance structure",
abstract = "Objectives A new procedure for skeletal sex estimation based on humeral and femoral dimensions is presented, based on skeletons from the United States. The approach specifically addresses the problem that arises from a lack of variance homogeneity between the sexes, taking into account prior information about the sample's sex ratio, if known. Material and methods Three measurements useful for estimating the sex of adult skeletons, the humeral and femoral head diameters and the humeral epicondylar breadth, were collected from 258 Americans born between 1893 and 1980 who died within the past several decades. Results For measurements individually and collectively, the probabilities of being one sex or the other were generated for samples with an equal distribution of males and females, taking into account the variance structure of the original measurements. The combination providing the best estimates correctly classifies 88.3{\%} of the skeletons, with 10.8{\%} considered unknown and 0.9{\%} assigned to the wrong sex. Discussion Probabilities of correct assignments are a better means of categorizing individuals as male or female than the sectioning points commonly used in skeletal studies. That is because it is possible to estimate the observer's certainty that the individual represented by measured bones was one sex or the other. A computer program is available that simultaneously considers samples of unequal sex composition. It is useful when there is contextual information available about the nature of skeletal samples (e.g., a mass burial from a battle or genocide).",
author = "Boldsen, {Jesper L.} and Milner, {George R.} and Boldsen, {S{\o}ren K.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ajpa.22812",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "158",
pages = "745--750",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Anthropology",
issn = "0002-9483",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Brief communication : Sex estimation from modern American humeri and femora, accounting for sample variance structure. / Boldsen, Jesper L.; Milner, George R.; Boldsen, Søren K.

In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 158, No. 4, 01.12.2015, p. 745-750.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brief communication

T2 - Sex estimation from modern American humeri and femora, accounting for sample variance structure

AU - Boldsen, Jesper L.

AU - Milner, George R.

AU - Boldsen, Søren K.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Objectives A new procedure for skeletal sex estimation based on humeral and femoral dimensions is presented, based on skeletons from the United States. The approach specifically addresses the problem that arises from a lack of variance homogeneity between the sexes, taking into account prior information about the sample's sex ratio, if known. Material and methods Three measurements useful for estimating the sex of adult skeletons, the humeral and femoral head diameters and the humeral epicondylar breadth, were collected from 258 Americans born between 1893 and 1980 who died within the past several decades. Results For measurements individually and collectively, the probabilities of being one sex or the other were generated for samples with an equal distribution of males and females, taking into account the variance structure of the original measurements. The combination providing the best estimates correctly classifies 88.3% of the skeletons, with 10.8% considered unknown and 0.9% assigned to the wrong sex. Discussion Probabilities of correct assignments are a better means of categorizing individuals as male or female than the sectioning points commonly used in skeletal studies. That is because it is possible to estimate the observer's certainty that the individual represented by measured bones was one sex or the other. A computer program is available that simultaneously considers samples of unequal sex composition. It is useful when there is contextual information available about the nature of skeletal samples (e.g., a mass burial from a battle or genocide).

AB - Objectives A new procedure for skeletal sex estimation based on humeral and femoral dimensions is presented, based on skeletons from the United States. The approach specifically addresses the problem that arises from a lack of variance homogeneity between the sexes, taking into account prior information about the sample's sex ratio, if known. Material and methods Three measurements useful for estimating the sex of adult skeletons, the humeral and femoral head diameters and the humeral epicondylar breadth, were collected from 258 Americans born between 1893 and 1980 who died within the past several decades. Results For measurements individually and collectively, the probabilities of being one sex or the other were generated for samples with an equal distribution of males and females, taking into account the variance structure of the original measurements. The combination providing the best estimates correctly classifies 88.3% of the skeletons, with 10.8% considered unknown and 0.9% assigned to the wrong sex. Discussion Probabilities of correct assignments are a better means of categorizing individuals as male or female than the sectioning points commonly used in skeletal studies. That is because it is possible to estimate the observer's certainty that the individual represented by measured bones was one sex or the other. A computer program is available that simultaneously considers samples of unequal sex composition. It is useful when there is contextual information available about the nature of skeletal samples (e.g., a mass burial from a battle or genocide).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983095105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983095105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ajpa.22812

DO - 10.1002/ajpa.22812

M3 - Article

C2 - 26212906

AN - SCOPUS:84983095105

VL - 158

SP - 745

EP - 750

JO - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

JF - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

SN - 0002-9483

IS - 4

ER -