Bring it On: Proactive coping with discrimination

Robyn K. Mallett, Janet Kay Swim

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated proactive coping with discrimination among heavy women in both a high impact lab study (101 women) and a daily diary study (62 women). Heavy women assessed greater harm and fewer coping resources for discriminatory, as compared to non-discriminatory, hassles (Study 2). Primary appraisals of harm were important determinants of proactive coping, including primary control (attempts to change the environment) and secondary control (attempts to change the self to fit the environment) directed at discriminatory stressors (Studies 1 and 2). When heavy women used primary control coping efforts, they experienced positive interpersonal outcomes (Study 1) and less negative intrapersonal outcomes (Study 2). We discuss the benefits and limitations of engaging in proactive coping and suggest avenues for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)411-441
Number of pages31
JournalMotivation and Emotion
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2005

Fingerprint

Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Mallett, Robyn K. ; Swim, Janet Kay. / Bring it On : Proactive coping with discrimination. In: Motivation and Emotion. 2005 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 411-441.
@article{b9e322b71bfb49519277e737cd9432e5,
title = "Bring it On: Proactive coping with discrimination",
abstract = "We investigated proactive coping with discrimination among heavy women in both a high impact lab study (101 women) and a daily diary study (62 women). Heavy women assessed greater harm and fewer coping resources for discriminatory, as compared to non-discriminatory, hassles (Study 2). Primary appraisals of harm were important determinants of proactive coping, including primary control (attempts to change the environment) and secondary control (attempts to change the self to fit the environment) directed at discriminatory stressors (Studies 1 and 2). When heavy women used primary control coping efforts, they experienced positive interpersonal outcomes (Study 1) and less negative intrapersonal outcomes (Study 2). We discuss the benefits and limitations of engaging in proactive coping and suggest avenues for future research.",
author = "Mallett, {Robyn K.} and Swim, {Janet Kay}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11031-006-9014-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "411--441",
journal = "Motivation and Emotion",
issn = "0146-7239",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

Bring it On : Proactive coping with discrimination. / Mallett, Robyn K.; Swim, Janet Kay.

In: Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 29, No. 4, 01.12.2005, p. 411-441.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bring it On

T2 - Proactive coping with discrimination

AU - Mallett, Robyn K.

AU - Swim, Janet Kay

PY - 2005/12/1

Y1 - 2005/12/1

N2 - We investigated proactive coping with discrimination among heavy women in both a high impact lab study (101 women) and a daily diary study (62 women). Heavy women assessed greater harm and fewer coping resources for discriminatory, as compared to non-discriminatory, hassles (Study 2). Primary appraisals of harm were important determinants of proactive coping, including primary control (attempts to change the environment) and secondary control (attempts to change the self to fit the environment) directed at discriminatory stressors (Studies 1 and 2). When heavy women used primary control coping efforts, they experienced positive interpersonal outcomes (Study 1) and less negative intrapersonal outcomes (Study 2). We discuss the benefits and limitations of engaging in proactive coping and suggest avenues for future research.

AB - We investigated proactive coping with discrimination among heavy women in both a high impact lab study (101 women) and a daily diary study (62 women). Heavy women assessed greater harm and fewer coping resources for discriminatory, as compared to non-discriminatory, hassles (Study 2). Primary appraisals of harm were important determinants of proactive coping, including primary control (attempts to change the environment) and secondary control (attempts to change the self to fit the environment) directed at discriminatory stressors (Studies 1 and 2). When heavy women used primary control coping efforts, they experienced positive interpersonal outcomes (Study 1) and less negative intrapersonal outcomes (Study 2). We discuss the benefits and limitations of engaging in proactive coping and suggest avenues for future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746808601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746808601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11031-006-9014-0

DO - 10.1007/s11031-006-9014-0

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:33746808601

VL - 29

SP - 411

EP - 441

JO - Motivation and Emotion

JF - Motivation and Emotion

SN - 0146-7239

IS - 4

ER -