Bringing leased assets onto the balance sheet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pending changes in lease accounting standards will require firms to recognize obligations that have historically been kept off-balance-sheet (OBS). We examine the implications of this accounting treatment for a host of common risk and performance metrics. Conventional leverage, Z-Score, levered beta, return on capital and other asset utilization measures underestimate risk and overstate performance of firms relying heavily on OBS leasing. The distortion affects relative rankings as well as average levels and has increased over time. Proposed changes in reporting standards aim to mitigate future distortion, but necessitate adjustments for time-series comparisons. Under current reporting standards, investors, analysts, and researchers can estimate leased asset value and adjust accounting-based metrics to better reflect these fixed costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)345-360
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Corporate Finance
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2013

Fingerprint

Assets
Balance sheet
Analysts
Obligation
Z-score
Performance metrics
Ranking
Lease
Leasing
Investors
Asset value
Accounting standards
Leverage
Risk measures
Fixed costs

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

@article{131e7cafac8949ccbac6404fb5affce7,
title = "Bringing leased assets onto the balance sheet",
abstract = "Pending changes in lease accounting standards will require firms to recognize obligations that have historically been kept off-balance-sheet (OBS). We examine the implications of this accounting treatment for a host of common risk and performance metrics. Conventional leverage, Z-Score, levered beta, return on capital and other asset utilization measures underestimate risk and overstate performance of firms relying heavily on OBS leasing. The distortion affects relative rankings as well as average levels and has increased over time. Proposed changes in reporting standards aim to mitigate future distortion, but necessitate adjustments for time-series comparisons. Under current reporting standards, investors, analysts, and researchers can estimate leased asset value and adjust accounting-based metrics to better reflect these fixed costs.",
author = "Cornaggia, {Kimberly J.} and Franzen, {Laurel A.} and Simin, {Timothy T.}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.06.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "345--360",
journal = "Journal of Corporate Finance",
issn = "0929-1199",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Bringing leased assets onto the balance sheet. / Cornaggia, Kimberly J.; Franzen, Laurel A.; Simin, Timothy T.

In: Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.08.2013, p. 345-360.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bringing leased assets onto the balance sheet

AU - Cornaggia, Kimberly J.

AU - Franzen, Laurel A.

AU - Simin, Timothy T.

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - Pending changes in lease accounting standards will require firms to recognize obligations that have historically been kept off-balance-sheet (OBS). We examine the implications of this accounting treatment for a host of common risk and performance metrics. Conventional leverage, Z-Score, levered beta, return on capital and other asset utilization measures underestimate risk and overstate performance of firms relying heavily on OBS leasing. The distortion affects relative rankings as well as average levels and has increased over time. Proposed changes in reporting standards aim to mitigate future distortion, but necessitate adjustments for time-series comparisons. Under current reporting standards, investors, analysts, and researchers can estimate leased asset value and adjust accounting-based metrics to better reflect these fixed costs.

AB - Pending changes in lease accounting standards will require firms to recognize obligations that have historically been kept off-balance-sheet (OBS). We examine the implications of this accounting treatment for a host of common risk and performance metrics. Conventional leverage, Z-Score, levered beta, return on capital and other asset utilization measures underestimate risk and overstate performance of firms relying heavily on OBS leasing. The distortion affects relative rankings as well as average levels and has increased over time. Proposed changes in reporting standards aim to mitigate future distortion, but necessitate adjustments for time-series comparisons. Under current reporting standards, investors, analysts, and researchers can estimate leased asset value and adjust accounting-based metrics to better reflect these fixed costs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880738381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880738381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.06.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.06.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84880738381

VL - 22

SP - 345

EP - 360

JO - Journal of Corporate Finance

JF - Journal of Corporate Finance

SN - 0929-1199

IS - 1

ER -