Bringing Rigor to the Use of Evidence in Policy Making: Translating Early Evidence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Beyond the evidence provided by randomized controlled trials, there is a need for supplementing and contextualizing efficacy findings through early evidence. This may include evidence of program costs, quality implementation processes, and impact of programs on different groups. This article considers the Quality and Impact of Component Evidence Assessment and other exemplary efforts for translating early evidence for policy making within a common framework. This framework includes processes for strategic review, development of guiding standards on the quality of evidence, and active communication with policy makers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)650-655
Number of pages6
JournalPublic Administration Review
Volume77
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

evidence
Policy making
communication
costs
Group
Communication
Implementation process
Quality costs
Randomized controlled trial
Politicians
Efficacy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{964616723a77439b893f71b8be17ff1d,
title = "Bringing Rigor to the Use of Evidence in Policy Making: Translating Early Evidence",
abstract = "Beyond the evidence provided by randomized controlled trials, there is a need for supplementing and contextualizing efficacy findings through early evidence. This may include evidence of program costs, quality implementation processes, and impact of programs on different groups. This article considers the Quality and Impact of Component Evidence Assessment and other exemplary efforts for translating early evidence for policy making within a common framework. This framework includes processes for strategic review, development of guiding standards on the quality of evidence, and active communication with policy makers.",
author = "Crowley, {Daniel Max} and Jennifer Scott",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/puar.12830",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "650--655",
journal = "Public Administration Review",
issn = "0033-3352",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

Bringing Rigor to the Use of Evidence in Policy Making : Translating Early Evidence. / Crowley, Daniel Max; Scott, Jennifer.

In: Public Administration Review, Vol. 77, No. 5, 01.09.2017, p. 650-655.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bringing Rigor to the Use of Evidence in Policy Making

T2 - Translating Early Evidence

AU - Crowley, Daniel Max

AU - Scott, Jennifer

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Beyond the evidence provided by randomized controlled trials, there is a need for supplementing and contextualizing efficacy findings through early evidence. This may include evidence of program costs, quality implementation processes, and impact of programs on different groups. This article considers the Quality and Impact of Component Evidence Assessment and other exemplary efforts for translating early evidence for policy making within a common framework. This framework includes processes for strategic review, development of guiding standards on the quality of evidence, and active communication with policy makers.

AB - Beyond the evidence provided by randomized controlled trials, there is a need for supplementing and contextualizing efficacy findings through early evidence. This may include evidence of program costs, quality implementation processes, and impact of programs on different groups. This article considers the Quality and Impact of Component Evidence Assessment and other exemplary efforts for translating early evidence for policy making within a common framework. This framework includes processes for strategic review, development of guiding standards on the quality of evidence, and active communication with policy makers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028548461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028548461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/puar.12830

DO - 10.1111/puar.12830

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85028548461

VL - 77

SP - 650

EP - 655

JO - Public Administration Review

JF - Public Administration Review

SN - 0033-3352

IS - 5

ER -