Bunker silo unloaders: An economic comparison

R. E. Muck, C. A. Rotz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the United States, bunker silos are most frequently emptied with a skid-steer loader or other bucket unloader. The value of a milling-type unloader on a typical 100-cow Michigan dairy farm was assessed using DAFOSYM, a simulation model of the dairy forage system. The milling-type unloader was predicted to improve dry matter recoveries 0.5 to 3.7 percentage units in alfalfa and 0.3 to 1.5 percentage units in corn silage dependent on silage densities and bunker unloading rates. This range in improved dry matter recovery and the resulting quality changes increased the annual net return from $275 to $4,816. Under good management, increases in net return from a milling-type device were on the order of $400 to $750 per year. This savings would justify an additional investment of up to $6,000 for this equipment if labor and energy requirements for silo emptying were not affected by the unloading method. If the milling-type unloader increased unloading time by 10%, increases in labor and energy costs would reduce the maximum breakeven investment by $3,480.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)273-280
Number of pages8
JournalApplied Engineering in Agriculture
Volume12
Issue number3
StatePublished - Dec 1 1996

Fingerprint

Unloading
Dairies
Economics
Personnel
Recovery
Loaders
Farms
Costs

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Muck, R. E., & Rotz, C. A. (1996). Bunker silo unloaders: An economic comparison. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 12(3), 273-280.
Muck, R. E. ; Rotz, C. A. / Bunker silo unloaders : An economic comparison. In: Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 1996 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 273-280.
@article{3da007c238a34c178a3eb3f47eb1e441,
title = "Bunker silo unloaders: An economic comparison",
abstract = "In the United States, bunker silos are most frequently emptied with a skid-steer loader or other bucket unloader. The value of a milling-type unloader on a typical 100-cow Michigan dairy farm was assessed using DAFOSYM, a simulation model of the dairy forage system. The milling-type unloader was predicted to improve dry matter recoveries 0.5 to 3.7 percentage units in alfalfa and 0.3 to 1.5 percentage units in corn silage dependent on silage densities and bunker unloading rates. This range in improved dry matter recovery and the resulting quality changes increased the annual net return from $275 to $4,816. Under good management, increases in net return from a milling-type device were on the order of $400 to $750 per year. This savings would justify an additional investment of up to $6,000 for this equipment if labor and energy requirements for silo emptying were not affected by the unloading method. If the milling-type unloader increased unloading time by 10{\%}, increases in labor and energy costs would reduce the maximum breakeven investment by $3,480.",
author = "Muck, {R. E.} and Rotz, {C. A.}",
year = "1996",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "273--280",
journal = "Applied Engineering in Agriculture",
issn = "0883-8542",
publisher = "American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers",
number = "3",

}

Muck, RE & Rotz, CA 1996, 'Bunker silo unloaders: An economic comparison', Applied Engineering in Agriculture, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 273-280.

Bunker silo unloaders : An economic comparison. / Muck, R. E.; Rotz, C. A.

In: Applied Engineering in Agriculture, Vol. 12, No. 3, 01.12.1996, p. 273-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bunker silo unloaders

T2 - An economic comparison

AU - Muck, R. E.

AU - Rotz, C. A.

PY - 1996/12/1

Y1 - 1996/12/1

N2 - In the United States, bunker silos are most frequently emptied with a skid-steer loader or other bucket unloader. The value of a milling-type unloader on a typical 100-cow Michigan dairy farm was assessed using DAFOSYM, a simulation model of the dairy forage system. The milling-type unloader was predicted to improve dry matter recoveries 0.5 to 3.7 percentage units in alfalfa and 0.3 to 1.5 percentage units in corn silage dependent on silage densities and bunker unloading rates. This range in improved dry matter recovery and the resulting quality changes increased the annual net return from $275 to $4,816. Under good management, increases in net return from a milling-type device were on the order of $400 to $750 per year. This savings would justify an additional investment of up to $6,000 for this equipment if labor and energy requirements for silo emptying were not affected by the unloading method. If the milling-type unloader increased unloading time by 10%, increases in labor and energy costs would reduce the maximum breakeven investment by $3,480.

AB - In the United States, bunker silos are most frequently emptied with a skid-steer loader or other bucket unloader. The value of a milling-type unloader on a typical 100-cow Michigan dairy farm was assessed using DAFOSYM, a simulation model of the dairy forage system. The milling-type unloader was predicted to improve dry matter recoveries 0.5 to 3.7 percentage units in alfalfa and 0.3 to 1.5 percentage units in corn silage dependent on silage densities and bunker unloading rates. This range in improved dry matter recovery and the resulting quality changes increased the annual net return from $275 to $4,816. Under good management, increases in net return from a milling-type device were on the order of $400 to $750 per year. This savings would justify an additional investment of up to $6,000 for this equipment if labor and energy requirements for silo emptying were not affected by the unloading method. If the milling-type unloader increased unloading time by 10%, increases in labor and energy costs would reduce the maximum breakeven investment by $3,480.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030146270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030146270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030146270

VL - 12

SP - 273

EP - 280

JO - Applied Engineering in Agriculture

JF - Applied Engineering in Agriculture

SN - 0883-8542

IS - 3

ER -