Can deliberative minipublics address the cognitive challenges of democratic citizenship?

Mark E. Warren, John W. Gastil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Democracy asks its citizens to make informed judgments about collective matters. Given the scale and complexity of modern polities, however, even the most attentive citizens cannot engage knowledgeably with most of the collective decisions that affect them. For this reason, democratic theorists increasingly conceptualize democratic systems as requiring divisions of cognitive labor, in which citizens trust others to make decisions on their behalf. Modern democracies have long relied on such trustees, yet institutional supports for good trust decisions by citizens are often weak or missing. We argue that deliberative minipublics can serve as trusted information proxies that help citizens make the most of their scarce cognitive resources. These kinds of trustees cannot close the gap between the demands of complex societies and citizens' capacities for informed judgment, but they may be able to narrow it.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)562-574
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume77
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

citizenship
citizen
democracy
collective decision
labor
society
resources

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{095be488221d40adbf09d362e8cc55cb,
title = "Can deliberative minipublics address the cognitive challenges of democratic citizenship?",
abstract = "Democracy asks its citizens to make informed judgments about collective matters. Given the scale and complexity of modern polities, however, even the most attentive citizens cannot engage knowledgeably with most of the collective decisions that affect them. For this reason, democratic theorists increasingly conceptualize democratic systems as requiring divisions of cognitive labor, in which citizens trust others to make decisions on their behalf. Modern democracies have long relied on such trustees, yet institutional supports for good trust decisions by citizens are often weak or missing. We argue that deliberative minipublics can serve as trusted information proxies that help citizens make the most of their scarce cognitive resources. These kinds of trustees cannot close the gap between the demands of complex societies and citizens' capacities for informed judgment, but they may be able to narrow it.",
author = "Warren, {Mark E.} and Gastil, {John W.}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/680078",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "562--574",
journal = "Journal of Politics",
issn = "0022-3816",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

Can deliberative minipublics address the cognitive challenges of democratic citizenship? / Warren, Mark E.; Gastil, John W.

In: Journal of Politics, Vol. 77, No. 2, 01.04.2015, p. 562-574.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can deliberative minipublics address the cognitive challenges of democratic citizenship?

AU - Warren, Mark E.

AU - Gastil, John W.

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Democracy asks its citizens to make informed judgments about collective matters. Given the scale and complexity of modern polities, however, even the most attentive citizens cannot engage knowledgeably with most of the collective decisions that affect them. For this reason, democratic theorists increasingly conceptualize democratic systems as requiring divisions of cognitive labor, in which citizens trust others to make decisions on their behalf. Modern democracies have long relied on such trustees, yet institutional supports for good trust decisions by citizens are often weak or missing. We argue that deliberative minipublics can serve as trusted information proxies that help citizens make the most of their scarce cognitive resources. These kinds of trustees cannot close the gap between the demands of complex societies and citizens' capacities for informed judgment, but they may be able to narrow it.

AB - Democracy asks its citizens to make informed judgments about collective matters. Given the scale and complexity of modern polities, however, even the most attentive citizens cannot engage knowledgeably with most of the collective decisions that affect them. For this reason, democratic theorists increasingly conceptualize democratic systems as requiring divisions of cognitive labor, in which citizens trust others to make decisions on their behalf. Modern democracies have long relied on such trustees, yet institutional supports for good trust decisions by citizens are often weak or missing. We argue that deliberative minipublics can serve as trusted information proxies that help citizens make the most of their scarce cognitive resources. These kinds of trustees cannot close the gap between the demands of complex societies and citizens' capacities for informed judgment, but they may be able to narrow it.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009108002&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009108002&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/680078

DO - 10.1086/680078

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85009108002

VL - 77

SP - 562

EP - 574

JO - Journal of Politics

JF - Journal of Politics

SN - 0022-3816

IS - 2

ER -