Can law-and-humanities survive systems theory?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Systems theory, as developed by the German sociologist and legal scholar Niklas Luhmann, presents a challenge to law-and-humanities scholarship. If law and literature, namely, are two autonomous social subsystems-on the analogy of two languages that communicate each within itself and have nothing to say to each other-then what can the "and" in law-and-literature mean? This paper compares the premises of systems theory with Habermasian and poststructuralist views of the law, and adumbrates both the strictures that an acceptance of systems theory would place on explorations of the relationship between law-and-humanities and the opportunities it might provide for new approaches to that relationship.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)244-268
Number of pages25
JournalLaw and Literature
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2010

Fingerprint

system theory
Law
subsystem
sociologist
acceptance
language
literature

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law

Cite this

@article{7b99a75ea33b4416a154511c566a747a,
title = "Can law-and-humanities survive systems theory?",
abstract = "Systems theory, as developed by the German sociologist and legal scholar Niklas Luhmann, presents a challenge to law-and-humanities scholarship. If law and literature, namely, are two autonomous social subsystems-on the analogy of two languages that communicate each within itself and have nothing to say to each other-then what can the {"}and{"} in law-and-literature mean? This paper compares the premises of systems theory with Habermasian and poststructuralist views of the law, and adumbrates both the strictures that an acceptance of systems theory would place on explorations of the relationship between law-and-humanities and the opportunities it might provide for new approaches to that relationship.",
author = "Beebee, {Thomas Oliver}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1525/lal.2010.22.2.244",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "244--268",
journal = "Law and Literature",
issn = "1535-685X",
publisher = "University of California Press",
number = "2",

}

Can law-and-humanities survive systems theory? / Beebee, Thomas Oliver.

In: Law and Literature, Vol. 22, No. 2, 01.06.2010, p. 244-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can law-and-humanities survive systems theory?

AU - Beebee, Thomas Oliver

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - Systems theory, as developed by the German sociologist and legal scholar Niklas Luhmann, presents a challenge to law-and-humanities scholarship. If law and literature, namely, are two autonomous social subsystems-on the analogy of two languages that communicate each within itself and have nothing to say to each other-then what can the "and" in law-and-literature mean? This paper compares the premises of systems theory with Habermasian and poststructuralist views of the law, and adumbrates both the strictures that an acceptance of systems theory would place on explorations of the relationship between law-and-humanities and the opportunities it might provide for new approaches to that relationship.

AB - Systems theory, as developed by the German sociologist and legal scholar Niklas Luhmann, presents a challenge to law-and-humanities scholarship. If law and literature, namely, are two autonomous social subsystems-on the analogy of two languages that communicate each within itself and have nothing to say to each other-then what can the "and" in law-and-literature mean? This paper compares the premises of systems theory with Habermasian and poststructuralist views of the law, and adumbrates both the strictures that an acceptance of systems theory would place on explorations of the relationship between law-and-humanities and the opportunities it might provide for new approaches to that relationship.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952863659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952863659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1525/lal.2010.22.2.244

DO - 10.1525/lal.2010.22.2.244

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79952863659

VL - 22

SP - 244

EP - 268

JO - Law and Literature

JF - Law and Literature

SN - 1535-685X

IS - 2

ER -