Can mature patch constraints mitigate the fragmenting effects of harvest opening size restrictions?

S. Rebain, Marc Eric McDill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Harvest scheduling models often include maximum harvest opening size constraints, a restriction generally imposed for legal or policy reasons. The maximum harvest opening size restriction can greatly affect the spatial layout of the forest, with the dispersed harvesting increasing forest fragmentation. Because they can offset the negative impacts of maximum harvest opening size constraints, mature patch size constraints, which require a certain amount of the forest to be in patches meeting both minimum size and age requirements, have also been included in these models. This paper looks at the economic and spatial effects of ten harvest scheduling formulations with these two constraint sets on 21 hypothetical forest landscapes. Analyses of their age-class distributions, border distributions, and patch size distributions at the end of a 60-year planning horizon confirm that maximum harvest opening size constraints tend to fragment forest landscapes and that mature patch constraints can significantly reduce these effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)499-513
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Transactions in Operational Research
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Scheduling
Planning
Economics
Harvest

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

@article{37487937cd35422ba40cc59da3be8ba3,
title = "Can mature patch constraints mitigate the fragmenting effects of harvest opening size restrictions?",
abstract = "Harvest scheduling models often include maximum harvest opening size constraints, a restriction generally imposed for legal or policy reasons. The maximum harvest opening size restriction can greatly affect the spatial layout of the forest, with the dispersed harvesting increasing forest fragmentation. Because they can offset the negative impacts of maximum harvest opening size constraints, mature patch size constraints, which require a certain amount of the forest to be in patches meeting both minimum size and age requirements, have also been included in these models. This paper looks at the economic and spatial effects of ten harvest scheduling formulations with these two constraint sets on 21 hypothetical forest landscapes. Analyses of their age-class distributions, border distributions, and patch size distributions at the end of a 60-year planning horizon confirm that maximum harvest opening size constraints tend to fragment forest landscapes and that mature patch constraints can significantly reduce these effects.",
author = "S. Rebain and McDill, {Marc Eric}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1475-3995.00424",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "499--513",
journal = "International Transactions in Operational Research",
issn = "0969-6016",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",
number = "5",

}

Can mature patch constraints mitigate the fragmenting effects of harvest opening size restrictions? / Rebain, S.; McDill, Marc Eric.

In: International Transactions in Operational Research, Vol. 10, No. 5, 01.01.2003, p. 499-513.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can mature patch constraints mitigate the fragmenting effects of harvest opening size restrictions?

AU - Rebain, S.

AU - McDill, Marc Eric

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Harvest scheduling models often include maximum harvest opening size constraints, a restriction generally imposed for legal or policy reasons. The maximum harvest opening size restriction can greatly affect the spatial layout of the forest, with the dispersed harvesting increasing forest fragmentation. Because they can offset the negative impacts of maximum harvest opening size constraints, mature patch size constraints, which require a certain amount of the forest to be in patches meeting both minimum size and age requirements, have also been included in these models. This paper looks at the economic and spatial effects of ten harvest scheduling formulations with these two constraint sets on 21 hypothetical forest landscapes. Analyses of their age-class distributions, border distributions, and patch size distributions at the end of a 60-year planning horizon confirm that maximum harvest opening size constraints tend to fragment forest landscapes and that mature patch constraints can significantly reduce these effects.

AB - Harvest scheduling models often include maximum harvest opening size constraints, a restriction generally imposed for legal or policy reasons. The maximum harvest opening size restriction can greatly affect the spatial layout of the forest, with the dispersed harvesting increasing forest fragmentation. Because they can offset the negative impacts of maximum harvest opening size constraints, mature patch size constraints, which require a certain amount of the forest to be in patches meeting both minimum size and age requirements, have also been included in these models. This paper looks at the economic and spatial effects of ten harvest scheduling formulations with these two constraint sets on 21 hypothetical forest landscapes. Analyses of their age-class distributions, border distributions, and patch size distributions at the end of a 60-year planning horizon confirm that maximum harvest opening size constraints tend to fragment forest landscapes and that mature patch constraints can significantly reduce these effects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644513689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644513689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1475-3995.00424

DO - 10.1111/1475-3995.00424

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 499

EP - 513

JO - International Transactions in Operational Research

JF - International Transactions in Operational Research

SN - 0969-6016

IS - 5

ER -