Can NEG placement have negative consequences (for efficient processing)? A bilingual test case

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The present study examines the relative processing efficiency of two typologically diverse configurations of sentential negation: immediately preverbal NEG and unbounded clause-final NEG. In order to effect a head-to-head comparison, the data are drawn from a bilingual speech community in the Afro-Colombian village of San Basilio de Palenque, in which two lexically cognate languages are in contact, differing principally in the placement of the sentential negator: Spanish (preverbal NEG) and the Afro-Hispanic creole language Palenquero (clause-final NEG). The results of a series of experiments suggest that preverbal negation is quite robust, while processing of clause-final negation is degraded under increased cognitive demands. Contextual and pragmatic cues ameliorate the processing of likely negative utterances, while unbounded clause-final negation is more vulnerable in ambiguous utterances. The contrasting behavior of Spanish and Palenquero negation highlights the possible role of processing mechanisms as contributing to typological differences among languages.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1147-1188
Number of pages42
JournalApplied Psycholinguistics
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Language
language
Hispanic Americans
Cues
pragmatics
village
contact
Efficiency
efficiency
experiment
community
Placement
Negation
Final Clause
Utterance
Palenquero

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{4f70bec1160a491a9d7a8a59109df18e,
title = "Can NEG placement have negative consequences (for efficient processing)? A bilingual test case",
abstract = "The present study examines the relative processing efficiency of two typologically diverse configurations of sentential negation: immediately preverbal NEG and unbounded clause-final NEG. In order to effect a head-to-head comparison, the data are drawn from a bilingual speech community in the Afro-Colombian village of San Basilio de Palenque, in which two lexically cognate languages are in contact, differing principally in the placement of the sentential negator: Spanish (preverbal NEG) and the Afro-Hispanic creole language Palenquero (clause-final NEG). The results of a series of experiments suggest that preverbal negation is quite robust, while processing of clause-final negation is degraded under increased cognitive demands. Contextual and pragmatic cues ameliorate the processing of likely negative utterances, while unbounded clause-final negation is more vulnerable in ambiguous utterances. The contrasting behavior of Spanish and Palenquero negation highlights the possible role of processing mechanisms as contributing to typological differences among languages.",
author = "John Lipski",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0142716418000279",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "1147--1188",
journal = "Applied Psycholinguistics",
issn = "0142-7164",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "6",

}

Can NEG placement have negative consequences (for efficient processing)? A bilingual test case. / Lipski, John.

In: Applied Psycholinguistics, Vol. 39, No. 6, 01.11.2018, p. 1147-1188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can NEG placement have negative consequences (for efficient processing)? A bilingual test case

AU - Lipski, John

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - The present study examines the relative processing efficiency of two typologically diverse configurations of sentential negation: immediately preverbal NEG and unbounded clause-final NEG. In order to effect a head-to-head comparison, the data are drawn from a bilingual speech community in the Afro-Colombian village of San Basilio de Palenque, in which two lexically cognate languages are in contact, differing principally in the placement of the sentential negator: Spanish (preverbal NEG) and the Afro-Hispanic creole language Palenquero (clause-final NEG). The results of a series of experiments suggest that preverbal negation is quite robust, while processing of clause-final negation is degraded under increased cognitive demands. Contextual and pragmatic cues ameliorate the processing of likely negative utterances, while unbounded clause-final negation is more vulnerable in ambiguous utterances. The contrasting behavior of Spanish and Palenquero negation highlights the possible role of processing mechanisms as contributing to typological differences among languages.

AB - The present study examines the relative processing efficiency of two typologically diverse configurations of sentential negation: immediately preverbal NEG and unbounded clause-final NEG. In order to effect a head-to-head comparison, the data are drawn from a bilingual speech community in the Afro-Colombian village of San Basilio de Palenque, in which two lexically cognate languages are in contact, differing principally in the placement of the sentential negator: Spanish (preverbal NEG) and the Afro-Hispanic creole language Palenquero (clause-final NEG). The results of a series of experiments suggest that preverbal negation is quite robust, while processing of clause-final negation is degraded under increased cognitive demands. Contextual and pragmatic cues ameliorate the processing of likely negative utterances, while unbounded clause-final negation is more vulnerable in ambiguous utterances. The contrasting behavior of Spanish and Palenquero negation highlights the possible role of processing mechanisms as contributing to typological differences among languages.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053663042&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053663042&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0142716418000279

DO - 10.1017/S0142716418000279

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 1147

EP - 1188

JO - Applied Psycholinguistics

JF - Applied Psycholinguistics

SN - 0142-7164

IS - 6

ER -