TY - JOUR
T1 - Can simplifying financial aid offers impact college enrollment and borrowing? Experimental and quasi-experimental evidence
AU - Rosinger, Kelly Ochs
N1 - Funding Information:
I am grateful to the administrators at the partner university who assisted with this research. I would also like to thank Benjamin Castleman, James Hearn, Erik Ness, Asher Rosinger, Robert Toutkoushian, and the editors and reviewers at Education Finance and Policy for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper. The research reported here was supported by a fellowship from the Jack Kent Cooke Foundation and funding from the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through grant R305B130013 to the University of Virginia. The opinions expressed are my own and do not represent views of the U.S. Department of Education or the Jack Kent Cooke Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Association for Education Finance and Policy.
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - Recent policy and research efforts have focused on simplifying the college-going process, improving transparency around college costs, and helping students make informed decisions. In 2012, the Obama administration released the “shopping sheet,” a standardized financial aid offer that is intended to provide students with simplified information about costs, loan options, and college outcomes. This paper examines the impact of the shopping sheet (adopted by more than 400 four-year colleges in two years) using: (1) administrative data from a field experiment among admitted and already-enrolled students at a public university, and (2) college-level data from a quasi-experiment among four-year colleges. Findings provide some evidence that information in the shopping sheet relating a college’s graduation rate to other colleges led to decreased borrowing at colleges with poor graduation outcomes. Additionally, the shopping sheet decreased borrowing at colleges that enroll high shares of students receiving federal student aid and underrepresented minority students. These findings indicate the shopping sheet may be particularly salient to students who traditionally face higher informational barriers during the college-going process.
AB - Recent policy and research efforts have focused on simplifying the college-going process, improving transparency around college costs, and helping students make informed decisions. In 2012, the Obama administration released the “shopping sheet,” a standardized financial aid offer that is intended to provide students with simplified information about costs, loan options, and college outcomes. This paper examines the impact of the shopping sheet (adopted by more than 400 four-year colleges in two years) using: (1) administrative data from a field experiment among admitted and already-enrolled students at a public university, and (2) college-level data from a quasi-experiment among four-year colleges. Findings provide some evidence that information in the shopping sheet relating a college’s graduation rate to other colleges led to decreased borrowing at colleges with poor graduation outcomes. Additionally, the shopping sheet decreased borrowing at colleges that enroll high shares of students receiving federal student aid and underrepresented minority students. These findings indicate the shopping sheet may be particularly salient to students who traditionally face higher informational barriers during the college-going process.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087986122&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087986122&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1162/edfp_a_00260
DO - 10.1162/edfp_a_00260
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85087986122
SN - 1557-3060
VL - 14
SP - 601
EP - 626
JO - Education Finance and Policy
JF - Education Finance and Policy
IS - 4
ER -