Can wearable sensors be used to capture engineering design team interactions? An investigation into the reliability of sociometric badges

Hong En Chen, Scarlett Rae Miller

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Engineering organizations around the word are increasingly becoming team-based due to a teams' ability to generate solutions to complex problems. This is thought to be attributed to the "wisdom of the collectives" where teams outperform the sum of their individual members. Despite heavy emphasis of teamwork in engineering design, our understanding of how to cultivate teamwork skills is poorly understood. This is due in part to the fact that research on engineering design teams is often based on 'snap-shot' ethnographic methods that do not account for the dynamic changes that happen over the course of a project. Research that does account for these interactions are hindered by the human processing required to code and analyze the immense amounts of video data acquired through team studies. Recent technological advances in the way of sociometric badges provide a potential avenue to explore intricate communication patterns and help researchers identify when and how team interventions should be developed. However, these technologies have not been validated for use in the dynamic context of engineering design teams. Thus, the current study was developed to examine sociometric badges for their accuracy, precision, and ability to determine speech dominance in engineering design teams. Our results show that sociometric badges can accurately capture total speaking time. However, the results also show that environmental conditions can impact their accuracy. In addition, we found that sociometric badges did not capture speech precisely and often overestimated when a team member was speaking. These results support the use of sociometric badges for capturing high level team interactions (e.g. participation and total speaking time) in engineering design research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication29th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology
PublisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
ISBN (Electronic)9780791858219
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
EventASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2017 - Cleveland, United States
Duration: Aug 6 2017Aug 9 2017

Publication series

NameProceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
Volume7

Other

OtherASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2017
CountryUnited States
CityCleveland
Period8/6/178/9/17

Fingerprint

Engineering Design
Sensor
Interaction
Team Work
Wearable sensors
Snapshot
Communication
Processing
Engineering

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Modeling and Simulation

Cite this

Chen, H. E., & Miller, S. R. (2017). Can wearable sensors be used to capture engineering design team interactions? An investigation into the reliability of sociometric badges. In 29th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference; Vol. 7). American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2017-68183
Chen, Hong En ; Miller, Scarlett Rae. / Can wearable sensors be used to capture engineering design team interactions? An investigation into the reliability of sociometric badges. 29th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2017. (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference).
@inproceedings{efa3cbdd2a0e4710b8315082cf7d7eb8,
title = "Can wearable sensors be used to capture engineering design team interactions? An investigation into the reliability of sociometric badges",
abstract = "Engineering organizations around the word are increasingly becoming team-based due to a teams' ability to generate solutions to complex problems. This is thought to be attributed to the {"}wisdom of the collectives{"} where teams outperform the sum of their individual members. Despite heavy emphasis of teamwork in engineering design, our understanding of how to cultivate teamwork skills is poorly understood. This is due in part to the fact that research on engineering design teams is often based on 'snap-shot' ethnographic methods that do not account for the dynamic changes that happen over the course of a project. Research that does account for these interactions are hindered by the human processing required to code and analyze the immense amounts of video data acquired through team studies. Recent technological advances in the way of sociometric badges provide a potential avenue to explore intricate communication patterns and help researchers identify when and how team interventions should be developed. However, these technologies have not been validated for use in the dynamic context of engineering design teams. Thus, the current study was developed to examine sociometric badges for their accuracy, precision, and ability to determine speech dominance in engineering design teams. Our results show that sociometric badges can accurately capture total speaking time. However, the results also show that environmental conditions can impact their accuracy. In addition, we found that sociometric badges did not capture speech precisely and often overestimated when a team member was speaking. These results support the use of sociometric badges for capturing high level team interactions (e.g. participation and total speaking time) in engineering design research.",
author = "Chen, {Hong En} and Miller, {Scarlett Rae}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1115/DETC2017-68183",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)",
booktitle = "29th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology",

}

Chen, HE & Miller, SR 2017, Can wearable sensors be used to capture engineering design team interactions? An investigation into the reliability of sociometric badges. in 29th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, vol. 7, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), ASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2017, Cleveland, United States, 8/6/17. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2017-68183

Can wearable sensors be used to capture engineering design team interactions? An investigation into the reliability of sociometric badges. / Chen, Hong En; Miller, Scarlett Rae.

29th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2017. (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference; Vol. 7).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Can wearable sensors be used to capture engineering design team interactions? An investigation into the reliability of sociometric badges

AU - Chen, Hong En

AU - Miller, Scarlett Rae

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Engineering organizations around the word are increasingly becoming team-based due to a teams' ability to generate solutions to complex problems. This is thought to be attributed to the "wisdom of the collectives" where teams outperform the sum of their individual members. Despite heavy emphasis of teamwork in engineering design, our understanding of how to cultivate teamwork skills is poorly understood. This is due in part to the fact that research on engineering design teams is often based on 'snap-shot' ethnographic methods that do not account for the dynamic changes that happen over the course of a project. Research that does account for these interactions are hindered by the human processing required to code and analyze the immense amounts of video data acquired through team studies. Recent technological advances in the way of sociometric badges provide a potential avenue to explore intricate communication patterns and help researchers identify when and how team interventions should be developed. However, these technologies have not been validated for use in the dynamic context of engineering design teams. Thus, the current study was developed to examine sociometric badges for their accuracy, precision, and ability to determine speech dominance in engineering design teams. Our results show that sociometric badges can accurately capture total speaking time. However, the results also show that environmental conditions can impact their accuracy. In addition, we found that sociometric badges did not capture speech precisely and often overestimated when a team member was speaking. These results support the use of sociometric badges for capturing high level team interactions (e.g. participation and total speaking time) in engineering design research.

AB - Engineering organizations around the word are increasingly becoming team-based due to a teams' ability to generate solutions to complex problems. This is thought to be attributed to the "wisdom of the collectives" where teams outperform the sum of their individual members. Despite heavy emphasis of teamwork in engineering design, our understanding of how to cultivate teamwork skills is poorly understood. This is due in part to the fact that research on engineering design teams is often based on 'snap-shot' ethnographic methods that do not account for the dynamic changes that happen over the course of a project. Research that does account for these interactions are hindered by the human processing required to code and analyze the immense amounts of video data acquired through team studies. Recent technological advances in the way of sociometric badges provide a potential avenue to explore intricate communication patterns and help researchers identify when and how team interventions should be developed. However, these technologies have not been validated for use in the dynamic context of engineering design teams. Thus, the current study was developed to examine sociometric badges for their accuracy, precision, and ability to determine speech dominance in engineering design teams. Our results show that sociometric badges can accurately capture total speaking time. However, the results also show that environmental conditions can impact their accuracy. In addition, we found that sociometric badges did not capture speech precisely and often overestimated when a team member was speaking. These results support the use of sociometric badges for capturing high level team interactions (e.g. participation and total speaking time) in engineering design research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035333090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035333090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/DETC2017-68183

DO - 10.1115/DETC2017-68183

M3 - Conference contribution

T3 - Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

BT - 29th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology

PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

ER -

Chen HE, Miller SR. Can wearable sensors be used to capture engineering design team interactions? An investigation into the reliability of sociometric badges. In 29th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). 2017. (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2017-68183