Carbon storage and nitrous oxide emissions of cropping systems in eastern Washington

A simulation study

C. Stöckle, S. Higgins, Armen Ricardo Kemanian, R. Nelson, D. Huggins, J. Marcos, H. Collins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conservation tillage is an agricultural strategy to mitigate atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In eastern Washington, we evaluated the long-term effects of conventional tillage (CT), reduced tillage (RT) and no-tillage (NT) on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage and nitrous oxide (N 2O) emissions at three dryland and one irrigated location using the cropping systems simulation model CropSyst. Conversion of CT to NT produced the largest relative increase in SOC storage (ΔSOC, average yearly change relative to CT) in the top 30 cm (11. 8 in) of soil where ΔSOC ranged from 0. 29 to 0. 53 Mg CO2e ha-1 y-1 (CO 2e is carbon dioxide [CO2] equivalent of SOC; 0. 13 to 0. 24 tn CO2e ac-1 yr-1). The ΔSOC were less with lower annual precipitation, greater fallow frequency, and when changing from CT to RT. Overall, ΔSOC decreased from the first to the third decade after conversion from CT to NT or RT. Simulations of ΔSOC for the conversion of CT to NT based on a 0 to 15 cm (0 to 5. 9 in) soil depth were greater than the ΔSOC based on a 0 to 30 cm depth, primarily due to differences among tillage regimes in the depth-distribution of carbon (C) inputs and the resultant SOC distribution with depth. Soil erosion rates under CT in the study region are high, posing deleterious effects on soil quality, productivity, and aquatic systems. However, an analysis that includes deposition, burial, and sedimentation on terrestrial and aquatic systems of eroded SOC indicates that the substantial erosion reduction obtained with RT and NT may result only in minor additional SOC oxidation as compared to CT. Simulated N2O emissions, expressed as CO2 equivalent, were not very different under CT, RT, and NT. However, N2O emissions were sufficiently high to offset gains in SOC from the conversion of CT to RT or NT. Thus, reducing tillage intensity can result in net C storage, but mitigation of GHG is limited unless it is coupled with nitrogen (N) fertilizer management to also reduce N2O emission.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)365-377
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Soil and Water Conservation
Volume67
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012

Fingerprint

nitrous oxide
carbon sequestration
soil organic carbon
tillage
cropping systems
cropping practice
conventional tillage
organic carbon
reduced tillage
no-tillage
simulation
zero tillage
soil
carbon dioxide
nitrogen fertilizers
eroded soils
greenhouse gas
conservation tillage
greenhouse gases
greenhouse gas emissions

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Soil Science
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Stöckle, C. ; Higgins, S. ; Kemanian, Armen Ricardo ; Nelson, R. ; Huggins, D. ; Marcos, J. ; Collins, H. / Carbon storage and nitrous oxide emissions of cropping systems in eastern Washington : A simulation study. In: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 2012 ; Vol. 67, No. 5. pp. 365-377.
@article{7e51c6545fc644fa867b3a69f76bf22c,
title = "Carbon storage and nitrous oxide emissions of cropping systems in eastern Washington: A simulation study",
abstract = "Conservation tillage is an agricultural strategy to mitigate atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In eastern Washington, we evaluated the long-term effects of conventional tillage (CT), reduced tillage (RT) and no-tillage (NT) on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage and nitrous oxide (N 2O) emissions at three dryland and one irrigated location using the cropping systems simulation model CropSyst. Conversion of CT to NT produced the largest relative increase in SOC storage (ΔSOC, average yearly change relative to CT) in the top 30 cm (11. 8 in) of soil where ΔSOC ranged from 0. 29 to 0. 53 Mg CO2e ha-1 y-1 (CO 2e is carbon dioxide [CO2] equivalent of SOC; 0. 13 to 0. 24 tn CO2e ac-1 yr-1). The ΔSOC were less with lower annual precipitation, greater fallow frequency, and when changing from CT to RT. Overall, ΔSOC decreased from the first to the third decade after conversion from CT to NT or RT. Simulations of ΔSOC for the conversion of CT to NT based on a 0 to 15 cm (0 to 5. 9 in) soil depth were greater than the ΔSOC based on a 0 to 30 cm depth, primarily due to differences among tillage regimes in the depth-distribution of carbon (C) inputs and the resultant SOC distribution with depth. Soil erosion rates under CT in the study region are high, posing deleterious effects on soil quality, productivity, and aquatic systems. However, an analysis that includes deposition, burial, and sedimentation on terrestrial and aquatic systems of eroded SOC indicates that the substantial erosion reduction obtained with RT and NT may result only in minor additional SOC oxidation as compared to CT. Simulated N2O emissions, expressed as CO2 equivalent, were not very different under CT, RT, and NT. However, N2O emissions were sufficiently high to offset gains in SOC from the conversion of CT to RT or NT. Thus, reducing tillage intensity can result in net C storage, but mitigation of GHG is limited unless it is coupled with nitrogen (N) fertilizer management to also reduce N2O emission.",
author = "C. St{\"o}ckle and S. Higgins and Kemanian, {Armen Ricardo} and R. Nelson and D. Huggins and J. Marcos and H. Collins",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2489/jswc.67.5.365",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "365--377",
journal = "Journal of Soils and Water Conservation",
issn = "0022-4561",
publisher = "Soil Conservation Society of America",
number = "5",

}

Carbon storage and nitrous oxide emissions of cropping systems in eastern Washington : A simulation study. / Stöckle, C.; Higgins, S.; Kemanian, Armen Ricardo; Nelson, R.; Huggins, D.; Marcos, J.; Collins, H.

In: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 67, No. 5, 01.09.2012, p. 365-377.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Carbon storage and nitrous oxide emissions of cropping systems in eastern Washington

T2 - A simulation study

AU - Stöckle, C.

AU - Higgins, S.

AU - Kemanian, Armen Ricardo

AU - Nelson, R.

AU - Huggins, D.

AU - Marcos, J.

AU - Collins, H.

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - Conservation tillage is an agricultural strategy to mitigate atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In eastern Washington, we evaluated the long-term effects of conventional tillage (CT), reduced tillage (RT) and no-tillage (NT) on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage and nitrous oxide (N 2O) emissions at three dryland and one irrigated location using the cropping systems simulation model CropSyst. Conversion of CT to NT produced the largest relative increase in SOC storage (ΔSOC, average yearly change relative to CT) in the top 30 cm (11. 8 in) of soil where ΔSOC ranged from 0. 29 to 0. 53 Mg CO2e ha-1 y-1 (CO 2e is carbon dioxide [CO2] equivalent of SOC; 0. 13 to 0. 24 tn CO2e ac-1 yr-1). The ΔSOC were less with lower annual precipitation, greater fallow frequency, and when changing from CT to RT. Overall, ΔSOC decreased from the first to the third decade after conversion from CT to NT or RT. Simulations of ΔSOC for the conversion of CT to NT based on a 0 to 15 cm (0 to 5. 9 in) soil depth were greater than the ΔSOC based on a 0 to 30 cm depth, primarily due to differences among tillage regimes in the depth-distribution of carbon (C) inputs and the resultant SOC distribution with depth. Soil erosion rates under CT in the study region are high, posing deleterious effects on soil quality, productivity, and aquatic systems. However, an analysis that includes deposition, burial, and sedimentation on terrestrial and aquatic systems of eroded SOC indicates that the substantial erosion reduction obtained with RT and NT may result only in minor additional SOC oxidation as compared to CT. Simulated N2O emissions, expressed as CO2 equivalent, were not very different under CT, RT, and NT. However, N2O emissions were sufficiently high to offset gains in SOC from the conversion of CT to RT or NT. Thus, reducing tillage intensity can result in net C storage, but mitigation of GHG is limited unless it is coupled with nitrogen (N) fertilizer management to also reduce N2O emission.

AB - Conservation tillage is an agricultural strategy to mitigate atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In eastern Washington, we evaluated the long-term effects of conventional tillage (CT), reduced tillage (RT) and no-tillage (NT) on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage and nitrous oxide (N 2O) emissions at three dryland and one irrigated location using the cropping systems simulation model CropSyst. Conversion of CT to NT produced the largest relative increase in SOC storage (ΔSOC, average yearly change relative to CT) in the top 30 cm (11. 8 in) of soil where ΔSOC ranged from 0. 29 to 0. 53 Mg CO2e ha-1 y-1 (CO 2e is carbon dioxide [CO2] equivalent of SOC; 0. 13 to 0. 24 tn CO2e ac-1 yr-1). The ΔSOC were less with lower annual precipitation, greater fallow frequency, and when changing from CT to RT. Overall, ΔSOC decreased from the first to the third decade after conversion from CT to NT or RT. Simulations of ΔSOC for the conversion of CT to NT based on a 0 to 15 cm (0 to 5. 9 in) soil depth were greater than the ΔSOC based on a 0 to 30 cm depth, primarily due to differences among tillage regimes in the depth-distribution of carbon (C) inputs and the resultant SOC distribution with depth. Soil erosion rates under CT in the study region are high, posing deleterious effects on soil quality, productivity, and aquatic systems. However, an analysis that includes deposition, burial, and sedimentation on terrestrial and aquatic systems of eroded SOC indicates that the substantial erosion reduction obtained with RT and NT may result only in minor additional SOC oxidation as compared to CT. Simulated N2O emissions, expressed as CO2 equivalent, were not very different under CT, RT, and NT. However, N2O emissions were sufficiently high to offset gains in SOC from the conversion of CT to RT or NT. Thus, reducing tillage intensity can result in net C storage, but mitigation of GHG is limited unless it is coupled with nitrogen (N) fertilizer management to also reduce N2O emission.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866364185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866364185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2489/jswc.67.5.365

DO - 10.2489/jswc.67.5.365

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 365

EP - 377

JO - Journal of Soils and Water Conservation

JF - Journal of Soils and Water Conservation

SN - 0022-4561

IS - 5

ER -