Carving sexuality at its joints: Defining sexual orientation in research and clinical practice

Anna C. Salomaa, Jessica Lynn Matsick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we review basic research on sexual orientation for a clinical scientist-practitioner audience. We present contemporary and evolving approaches to defining and measuring sexual orientation, and we provide suggestions for how to translate psychological theory into best practices (i.e., how to select appropriate sexuality measures in both research and clinical settings). Our focus is on evaluating currently available measures of sexual orientation in terms of comprehensiveness and feasibility: How thoroughly are components of sexuality captured and how feasible it is to use such measures in research and clinical settings? Basic research in sexuality has progressed beyond our current clinical practices and should be used as a guide to more responsibly conceptualize participants and clients. While we determine that the current options are far from perfect, the critical clinician will find that contemporary measures of sexual orientation prove more useful than more simplistic predecessors. This review will elucidate best strategies for translating sexual orientation research and theory into clinical practice and provide clinicians and researchers alike with theoretically grounded support for tools of measurement and assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)167-180
Number of pages14
JournalPsychological Assessment
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

Sexuality
Sexual Behavior
Joints
Research
Psychological Theory
Practice Guidelines
Research Personnel

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{5f69830048cc48978370addd299a3f34,
title = "Carving sexuality at its joints: Defining sexual orientation in research and clinical practice",
abstract = "In this article, we review basic research on sexual orientation for a clinical scientist-practitioner audience. We present contemporary and evolving approaches to defining and measuring sexual orientation, and we provide suggestions for how to translate psychological theory into best practices (i.e., how to select appropriate sexuality measures in both research and clinical settings). Our focus is on evaluating currently available measures of sexual orientation in terms of comprehensiveness and feasibility: How thoroughly are components of sexuality captured and how feasible it is to use such measures in research and clinical settings? Basic research in sexuality has progressed beyond our current clinical practices and should be used as a guide to more responsibly conceptualize participants and clients. While we determine that the current options are far from perfect, the critical clinician will find that contemporary measures of sexual orientation prove more useful than more simplistic predecessors. This review will elucidate best strategies for translating sexual orientation research and theory into clinical practice and provide clinicians and researchers alike with theoretically grounded support for tools of measurement and assessment.",
author = "Salomaa, {Anna C.} and Matsick, {Jessica Lynn}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/pas0000656",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "167--180",
journal = "Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1040-3590",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Carving sexuality at its joints : Defining sexual orientation in research and clinical practice. / Salomaa, Anna C.; Matsick, Jessica Lynn.

In: Psychological Assessment, Vol. 31, No. 2, 01.02.2019, p. 167-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Carving sexuality at its joints

T2 - Defining sexual orientation in research and clinical practice

AU - Salomaa, Anna C.

AU - Matsick, Jessica Lynn

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - In this article, we review basic research on sexual orientation for a clinical scientist-practitioner audience. We present contemporary and evolving approaches to defining and measuring sexual orientation, and we provide suggestions for how to translate psychological theory into best practices (i.e., how to select appropriate sexuality measures in both research and clinical settings). Our focus is on evaluating currently available measures of sexual orientation in terms of comprehensiveness and feasibility: How thoroughly are components of sexuality captured and how feasible it is to use such measures in research and clinical settings? Basic research in sexuality has progressed beyond our current clinical practices and should be used as a guide to more responsibly conceptualize participants and clients. While we determine that the current options are far from perfect, the critical clinician will find that contemporary measures of sexual orientation prove more useful than more simplistic predecessors. This review will elucidate best strategies for translating sexual orientation research and theory into clinical practice and provide clinicians and researchers alike with theoretically grounded support for tools of measurement and assessment.

AB - In this article, we review basic research on sexual orientation for a clinical scientist-practitioner audience. We present contemporary and evolving approaches to defining and measuring sexual orientation, and we provide suggestions for how to translate psychological theory into best practices (i.e., how to select appropriate sexuality measures in both research and clinical settings). Our focus is on evaluating currently available measures of sexual orientation in terms of comprehensiveness and feasibility: How thoroughly are components of sexuality captured and how feasible it is to use such measures in research and clinical settings? Basic research in sexuality has progressed beyond our current clinical practices and should be used as a guide to more responsibly conceptualize participants and clients. While we determine that the current options are far from perfect, the critical clinician will find that contemporary measures of sexual orientation prove more useful than more simplistic predecessors. This review will elucidate best strategies for translating sexual orientation research and theory into clinical practice and provide clinicians and researchers alike with theoretically grounded support for tools of measurement and assessment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053080296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053080296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/pas0000656

DO - 10.1037/pas0000656

M3 - Article

C2 - 30211575

AN - SCOPUS:85053080296

VL - 31

SP - 167

EP - 180

JO - Psychological Assessment

JF - Psychological Assessment

SN - 1040-3590

IS - 2

ER -