Casualties of Social Combat: School Networks of Peer Victimization and Their Consequences

Robert Faris, Diane Felmlee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We point to group processes of status conflict and norm enforcement as fundamental elements in the development of school-based victimization. Socially vulnerable youth are frequently harassed for violating norms, but the logic of status competition implies they are not the only victims: to the extent that aggression is instrumental for social climbing, increases in status should increase risk-at least until the pinnacle of the hierarchy is reached. Victimization causes serious harm, and, we argue, at the margin these consequences will be magnified by status. We test these ideas using longitudinal network data on friendship and victimization from 19 schools. For most students, status increases the risk of victimization. However, youth at the uppermost extremes of the school hierarchy-students in the top 5 percent of centrality and those with cross-gender friendships where such friendships are rare-sit just above the fray, unlikely to fall victim to their peers. As expected, females and physically or socially vulnerable youth are victimized at particularly high rates. Victims experience psychological distress and social marginalization, and these adverse effects are magnified by status. For most students, gains in status increase the likelihood of victimization and the severity of its consequences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)228-257
Number of pages30
JournalAmerican sociological review
Volume79
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2014

Fingerprint

victimization
friendship
school
data network
student
aggression
cause
gender
experience
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{1c79fccc07414362851064acc889cb3e,
title = "Casualties of Social Combat: School Networks of Peer Victimization and Their Consequences",
abstract = "We point to group processes of status conflict and norm enforcement as fundamental elements in the development of school-based victimization. Socially vulnerable youth are frequently harassed for violating norms, but the logic of status competition implies they are not the only victims: to the extent that aggression is instrumental for social climbing, increases in status should increase risk-at least until the pinnacle of the hierarchy is reached. Victimization causes serious harm, and, we argue, at the margin these consequences will be magnified by status. We test these ideas using longitudinal network data on friendship and victimization from 19 schools. For most students, status increases the risk of victimization. However, youth at the uppermost extremes of the school hierarchy-students in the top 5 percent of centrality and those with cross-gender friendships where such friendships are rare-sit just above the fray, unlikely to fall victim to their peers. As expected, females and physically or socially vulnerable youth are victimized at particularly high rates. Victims experience psychological distress and social marginalization, and these adverse effects are magnified by status. For most students, gains in status increase the likelihood of victimization and the severity of its consequences.",
author = "Robert Faris and Diane Felmlee",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/0003122414524573",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "228--257",
journal = "American Sociological Review",
issn = "0003-1224",
publisher = "American Sociological Association",
number = "2",

}

Casualties of Social Combat : School Networks of Peer Victimization and Their Consequences. / Faris, Robert; Felmlee, Diane.

In: American sociological review, Vol. 79, No. 2, 04.2014, p. 228-257.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Casualties of Social Combat

T2 - School Networks of Peer Victimization and Their Consequences

AU - Faris, Robert

AU - Felmlee, Diane

PY - 2014/4

Y1 - 2014/4

N2 - We point to group processes of status conflict and norm enforcement as fundamental elements in the development of school-based victimization. Socially vulnerable youth are frequently harassed for violating norms, but the logic of status competition implies they are not the only victims: to the extent that aggression is instrumental for social climbing, increases in status should increase risk-at least until the pinnacle of the hierarchy is reached. Victimization causes serious harm, and, we argue, at the margin these consequences will be magnified by status. We test these ideas using longitudinal network data on friendship and victimization from 19 schools. For most students, status increases the risk of victimization. However, youth at the uppermost extremes of the school hierarchy-students in the top 5 percent of centrality and those with cross-gender friendships where such friendships are rare-sit just above the fray, unlikely to fall victim to their peers. As expected, females and physically or socially vulnerable youth are victimized at particularly high rates. Victims experience psychological distress and social marginalization, and these adverse effects are magnified by status. For most students, gains in status increase the likelihood of victimization and the severity of its consequences.

AB - We point to group processes of status conflict and norm enforcement as fundamental elements in the development of school-based victimization. Socially vulnerable youth are frequently harassed for violating norms, but the logic of status competition implies they are not the only victims: to the extent that aggression is instrumental for social climbing, increases in status should increase risk-at least until the pinnacle of the hierarchy is reached. Victimization causes serious harm, and, we argue, at the margin these consequences will be magnified by status. We test these ideas using longitudinal network data on friendship and victimization from 19 schools. For most students, status increases the risk of victimization. However, youth at the uppermost extremes of the school hierarchy-students in the top 5 percent of centrality and those with cross-gender friendships where such friendships are rare-sit just above the fray, unlikely to fall victim to their peers. As expected, females and physically or socially vulnerable youth are victimized at particularly high rates. Victims experience psychological distress and social marginalization, and these adverse effects are magnified by status. For most students, gains in status increase the likelihood of victimization and the severity of its consequences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898912666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898912666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0003122414524573

DO - 10.1177/0003122414524573

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84898912666

VL - 79

SP - 228

EP - 257

JO - American Sociological Review

JF - American Sociological Review

SN - 0003-1224

IS - 2

ER -