TY - JOUR
T1 - Catalyzing community-led solar development by enabling cooperative behavior
T2 - Insights from an experimental game in the United States
AU - Ferster, Bronson
AU - Brownson, Jeffrey R. S
AU - Macht, Gretchen A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Facilitation and planning of the Community Solar on State workshop cycles was led by John Boecker of the regenerative design and planning firm 7group (sevengroup.com). Funding support for the workshops was provided by the Pennsylvania State University's Sustainability Institute (ReInvention Fund). The authors are grateful for the cooperation from Cory Miller and the University Area Joint Authority; as well as Robert Cooper, Mike Prinkey, and the Office of the Physical Plant at the Pennsylvania State University.
Funding Information:
Facilitation and planning of the Community Solar on State workshop cycles was led by John Boecker of the regenerative design and planning firm 7group (sevengroup.com). Funding support for the workshops was provided by the Pennsylvania State University's Sustainability Institute (ReInvention Fund). The authors are grateful for the cooperation from Cory Miller and the University Area Joint Authority; as well as Robert Cooper, Mike Prinkey, and the Office of the Physical Plant at the Pennsylvania State University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - This work presents an empirically tested method to initiate community solar development by enabling cooperative behavior among groups of stakeholders. Shared solar represents only a fraction of distributed photovoltaic generation despite advantages over other distributed solar models. A framework that addresses the inherent characteristics of community solar would increase development. In this work, a non-cooperative game modeled stakeholders’ codependent decision between models of solar development, and it served as the control experiment with unfacilitated communication. An experimental “catalyst” for onboarding community solar tested the influence of facilitated cooperation on project development. In the experiment, stakeholders were engaged through demonstrated practices that lead to cooperative behavior. Interviews conducted with project leads from subsequent community-led solar projects qualitatively assessed the catalyst, and a cooperative game model measured the influence of the catalyst quantitatively. The control game revealed a rational agent preferred a low-utility independent-solar strategy to a higher-utility cooperative-solar strategy in the locale (20% difference in welfare). This result emphasized the need for an intra-active force (i.e., the proposed catalyst) to reach the most economically efficient outcomes. Efforts to facilitate cooperative behavior catalyzed two community-led solar projects in a locale previously void of community solar. The experimental catalyst was the dominant player for onboarding community solar, responsible for 53% of the effective onboarding in the region. Additionally, the catalyzed solar projects experienced an increase in onboarding effectiveness by a factor of two-to-three. The community solar catalyst can be applied in other locales to overcome barriers inhibiting shared solar development.
AB - This work presents an empirically tested method to initiate community solar development by enabling cooperative behavior among groups of stakeholders. Shared solar represents only a fraction of distributed photovoltaic generation despite advantages over other distributed solar models. A framework that addresses the inherent characteristics of community solar would increase development. In this work, a non-cooperative game modeled stakeholders’ codependent decision between models of solar development, and it served as the control experiment with unfacilitated communication. An experimental “catalyst” for onboarding community solar tested the influence of facilitated cooperation on project development. In the experiment, stakeholders were engaged through demonstrated practices that lead to cooperative behavior. Interviews conducted with project leads from subsequent community-led solar projects qualitatively assessed the catalyst, and a cooperative game model measured the influence of the catalyst quantitatively. The control game revealed a rational agent preferred a low-utility independent-solar strategy to a higher-utility cooperative-solar strategy in the locale (20% difference in welfare). This result emphasized the need for an intra-active force (i.e., the proposed catalyst) to reach the most economically efficient outcomes. Efforts to facilitate cooperative behavior catalyzed two community-led solar projects in a locale previously void of community solar. The experimental catalyst was the dominant player for onboarding community solar, responsible for 53% of the effective onboarding in the region. Additionally, the catalyzed solar projects experienced an increase in onboarding effectiveness by a factor of two-to-three. The community solar catalyst can be applied in other locales to overcome barriers inhibiting shared solar development.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077704702&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077704702&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101408
DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101408
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85077704702
VL - 63
JO - Energy Research and Social Science
JF - Energy Research and Social Science
SN - 2214-6296
M1 - 101408
ER -