Categorization by association

Nuclear technology and emission-free electricity

Raghu B. Garud, Joel Gehman, Peter Karnøe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

At different points in time, energy harnessed from nuclear technology for commercial purposes has been qualified as atoms for peace, too cheap to meter, unsafe, sustainable, and emission free. We explore how these associations - between nuclear technology (a category used in a descriptive way) and qualities such as emission free (a category used in an evaluative way) - are materially anchored, institutionally performed, socially relevant, and entrepreneurially negotiated. By considering all these factors, our analysis shows that it is possible to understand how and why categories and their meanings continue to change over time. We flesh out the implications of these observations and suggest avenues for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)51-93
Number of pages43
JournalResearch in the Sociology of Work
Volume21
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010

Fingerprint

electricity
factor analysis
peace
energy
time

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{daed2ae52a6c496980dadd25c20c750e,
title = "Categorization by association: Nuclear technology and emission-free electricity",
abstract = "At different points in time, energy harnessed from nuclear technology for commercial purposes has been qualified as atoms for peace, too cheap to meter, unsafe, sustainable, and emission free. We explore how these associations - between nuclear technology (a category used in a descriptive way) and qualities such as emission free (a category used in an evaluative way) - are materially anchored, institutionally performed, socially relevant, and entrepreneurially negotiated. By considering all these factors, our analysis shows that it is possible to understand how and why categories and their meanings continue to change over time. We flesh out the implications of these observations and suggest avenues for future research.",
author = "Garud, {Raghu B.} and Joel Gehman and Peter Karn{\o}e",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/S0277-2833(2010)0000021007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "51--93",
journal = "Research in the Sociology of Work",
issn = "0277-2833",
publisher = "JAI Press",

}

Categorization by association : Nuclear technology and emission-free electricity. / Garud, Raghu B.; Gehman, Joel; Karnøe, Peter.

In: Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 21, 01.12.2010, p. 51-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Categorization by association

T2 - Nuclear technology and emission-free electricity

AU - Garud, Raghu B.

AU - Gehman, Joel

AU - Karnøe, Peter

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - At different points in time, energy harnessed from nuclear technology for commercial purposes has been qualified as atoms for peace, too cheap to meter, unsafe, sustainable, and emission free. We explore how these associations - between nuclear technology (a category used in a descriptive way) and qualities such as emission free (a category used in an evaluative way) - are materially anchored, institutionally performed, socially relevant, and entrepreneurially negotiated. By considering all these factors, our analysis shows that it is possible to understand how and why categories and their meanings continue to change over time. We flesh out the implications of these observations and suggest avenues for future research.

AB - At different points in time, energy harnessed from nuclear technology for commercial purposes has been qualified as atoms for peace, too cheap to meter, unsafe, sustainable, and emission free. We explore how these associations - between nuclear technology (a category used in a descriptive way) and qualities such as emission free (a category used in an evaluative way) - are materially anchored, institutionally performed, socially relevant, and entrepreneurially negotiated. By considering all these factors, our analysis shows that it is possible to understand how and why categories and their meanings continue to change over time. We flesh out the implications of these observations and suggest avenues for future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82455237823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82455237823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/S0277-2833(2010)0000021007

DO - 10.1108/S0277-2833(2010)0000021007

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 51

EP - 93

JO - Research in the Sociology of Work

JF - Research in the Sociology of Work

SN - 0277-2833

ER -