Central venous lines in pediatric oncology patients: A single institution experience, including risk factors for early removal

Amisha Shah, Andrew Freiberg, Erik B. Lehman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: To tabulate the types of lines used for childhood cancer at our institution and risk factors for early removal. Background/Introduction: Most children with cancer require central venous catheters for chemotherapy, support and monitoring, but infection, dysfunction (i.e. mechanical problems such as fracture and nonthrombotic obstruction) and thrombosis often necessitate unplanned removal. Timing and type of line chosen may determine central line longevity. Review of Relevant Literature: A literature search revealed that there are minimal and conflicting data in the realm of pediatric central lines and reasons for their removal, especially in the ALL population. Methods: We reviewed records of all children diagnosed with cancer at our institution from 2002 to 2003 to catalog types of lines and variables that impacted line survival. Results: 174 children were diagnosed with cancer in 2002-2003; 175 lines in 103 children total were used in the study-117 were removed electively, 58 were removed non-electively. Several variables, including infection, predicted non-elective removal. External tunneled lines were associated with non-elective removal (OR: 11.9, p<0.01) and removal due to infection (OR: 10.41, p<0.01) more often than were tunneled ports. Patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in which a tunneled port was placed at diagnosis were more likely to require non-elective removal than tunneled ports placed after induction chemotherapy (43% vs. 8%). While this difference did not reach significance due to low numbers of early placements, 43% of placements at diagnosis failed by 125 days, whereas 100% of lines placed late were still in place until 393 days and 72% were still in place up to 803 days. Conclusions: Early central line removal in pediatric oncology is determined by interdependent factors and prospective studies are needed to guide the timing and type of line for individual patients. However, early line placement for ALL may be associated with poor line survival.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)141-142
Number of pages2
JournalJAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
Pediatrics
Neoplasms
Infection
Induction Chemotherapy
Survival
Central Venous Catheters
Thrombosis
Prospective Studies
Drug Therapy
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{f457bfb731a741e0907bd2e8381a5e2d,
title = "Central venous lines in pediatric oncology patients: A single institution experience, including risk factors for early removal",
abstract = "Aim/Purpose: To tabulate the types of lines used for childhood cancer at our institution and risk factors for early removal. Background/Introduction: Most children with cancer require central venous catheters for chemotherapy, support and monitoring, but infection, dysfunction (i.e. mechanical problems such as fracture and nonthrombotic obstruction) and thrombosis often necessitate unplanned removal. Timing and type of line chosen may determine central line longevity. Review of Relevant Literature: A literature search revealed that there are minimal and conflicting data in the realm of pediatric central lines and reasons for their removal, especially in the ALL population. Methods: We reviewed records of all children diagnosed with cancer at our institution from 2002 to 2003 to catalog types of lines and variables that impacted line survival. Results: 174 children were diagnosed with cancer in 2002-2003; 175 lines in 103 children total were used in the study-117 were removed electively, 58 were removed non-electively. Several variables, including infection, predicted non-elective removal. External tunneled lines were associated with non-elective removal (OR: 11.9, p<0.01) and removal due to infection (OR: 10.41, p<0.01) more often than were tunneled ports. Patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in which a tunneled port was placed at diagnosis were more likely to require non-elective removal than tunneled ports placed after induction chemotherapy (43{\%} vs. 8{\%}). While this difference did not reach significance due to low numbers of early placements, 43{\%} of placements at diagnosis failed by 125 days, whereas 100{\%} of lines placed late were still in place until 393 days and 72{\%} were still in place up to 803 days. Conclusions: Early central line removal in pediatric oncology is determined by interdependent factors and prospective studies are needed to guide the timing and type of line for individual patients. However, early line placement for ALL may be associated with poor line survival.",
author = "Amisha Shah and Andrew Freiberg and Lehman, {Erik B.}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2309/java.15-3-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "141--142",
journal = "JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access",
issn = "1552-8855",
publisher = "Association for Vascular Access",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Central venous lines in pediatric oncology patients

T2 - A single institution experience, including risk factors for early removal

AU - Shah, Amisha

AU - Freiberg, Andrew

AU - Lehman, Erik B.

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Aim/Purpose: To tabulate the types of lines used for childhood cancer at our institution and risk factors for early removal. Background/Introduction: Most children with cancer require central venous catheters for chemotherapy, support and monitoring, but infection, dysfunction (i.e. mechanical problems such as fracture and nonthrombotic obstruction) and thrombosis often necessitate unplanned removal. Timing and type of line chosen may determine central line longevity. Review of Relevant Literature: A literature search revealed that there are minimal and conflicting data in the realm of pediatric central lines and reasons for their removal, especially in the ALL population. Methods: We reviewed records of all children diagnosed with cancer at our institution from 2002 to 2003 to catalog types of lines and variables that impacted line survival. Results: 174 children were diagnosed with cancer in 2002-2003; 175 lines in 103 children total were used in the study-117 were removed electively, 58 were removed non-electively. Several variables, including infection, predicted non-elective removal. External tunneled lines were associated with non-elective removal (OR: 11.9, p<0.01) and removal due to infection (OR: 10.41, p<0.01) more often than were tunneled ports. Patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in which a tunneled port was placed at diagnosis were more likely to require non-elective removal than tunneled ports placed after induction chemotherapy (43% vs. 8%). While this difference did not reach significance due to low numbers of early placements, 43% of placements at diagnosis failed by 125 days, whereas 100% of lines placed late were still in place until 393 days and 72% were still in place up to 803 days. Conclusions: Early central line removal in pediatric oncology is determined by interdependent factors and prospective studies are needed to guide the timing and type of line for individual patients. However, early line placement for ALL may be associated with poor line survival.

AB - Aim/Purpose: To tabulate the types of lines used for childhood cancer at our institution and risk factors for early removal. Background/Introduction: Most children with cancer require central venous catheters for chemotherapy, support and monitoring, but infection, dysfunction (i.e. mechanical problems such as fracture and nonthrombotic obstruction) and thrombosis often necessitate unplanned removal. Timing and type of line chosen may determine central line longevity. Review of Relevant Literature: A literature search revealed that there are minimal and conflicting data in the realm of pediatric central lines and reasons for their removal, especially in the ALL population. Methods: We reviewed records of all children diagnosed with cancer at our institution from 2002 to 2003 to catalog types of lines and variables that impacted line survival. Results: 174 children were diagnosed with cancer in 2002-2003; 175 lines in 103 children total were used in the study-117 were removed electively, 58 were removed non-electively. Several variables, including infection, predicted non-elective removal. External tunneled lines were associated with non-elective removal (OR: 11.9, p<0.01) and removal due to infection (OR: 10.41, p<0.01) more often than were tunneled ports. Patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in which a tunneled port was placed at diagnosis were more likely to require non-elective removal than tunneled ports placed after induction chemotherapy (43% vs. 8%). While this difference did not reach significance due to low numbers of early placements, 43% of placements at diagnosis failed by 125 days, whereas 100% of lines placed late were still in place until 393 days and 72% were still in place up to 803 days. Conclusions: Early central line removal in pediatric oncology is determined by interdependent factors and prospective studies are needed to guide the timing and type of line for individual patients. However, early line placement for ALL may be associated with poor line survival.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952355782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952355782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2309/java.15-3-5

DO - 10.2309/java.15-3-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79952355782

VL - 15

SP - 141

EP - 142

JO - JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access

JF - JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access

SN - 1552-8855

IS - 3

ER -