Cesarean skin closure preferences: A survey of obstetricians

A. Dhanya MacKeen, Tara Devaraj, Jason K. Baxter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: In light of the limited evidence directing cesarean skin closure techniques, we evaluated the factors guiding obstetricians' preferences for closure method. Methods: From 07/11 to 12/11, an online survey was sent to obstetricians in ACOG Regions I and II. Obstetricians were asked to indicate their cesarean skin closure preferences when considering various factors and to rank the importance of these factors in their decision. Practice type, experience and usual method of closure were also assessed. Results: Responses were received from 470 of 1400 surveyed (34% response rate), of which 422 were analyzed. Similar proportions reported primarily using sutures (39%) or staples (48%); 13% use both methods equally. More obstetricians at community hospitals primarily use sutures (48% versus 39%, p<0.001), while more at university hospitals primarily use staples (57% versus 30%, p<0.001). Listed in decreasing order of importance, sutures were preferred when considering patient satisfaction, keloid susceptibility, cosmesis, first Pfannenstiel incisions or cost. Staples were preferred when considering wound infections, obese patients, chorioamnionitis, HIV/AIDS or busy labor floors (p<0.001). Conclusion: The limited evidence to guide cesarean skin closure forces obstetricians to rely on personal experience. Our survey indicates that despite this limitation, obstetricians have specific preferences for cesarean skin closure method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)753-756
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Volume26
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2013

Fingerprint

Skin
Sutures
Chorioamnionitis
Keloid
Community Hospital
Wound Infection
Patient Satisfaction
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Surveys and Questionnaires
HIV
Costs and Cost Analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

MacKeen, A. Dhanya ; Devaraj, Tara ; Baxter, Jason K. / Cesarean skin closure preferences : A survey of obstetricians. In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 26, No. 8. pp. 753-756.
@article{50aaaeecac6b4e58bbccd687fe1acae7,
title = "Cesarean skin closure preferences: A survey of obstetricians",
abstract = "Objective: In light of the limited evidence directing cesarean skin closure techniques, we evaluated the factors guiding obstetricians' preferences for closure method. Methods: From 07/11 to 12/11, an online survey was sent to obstetricians in ACOG Regions I and II. Obstetricians were asked to indicate their cesarean skin closure preferences when considering various factors and to rank the importance of these factors in their decision. Practice type, experience and usual method of closure were also assessed. Results: Responses were received from 470 of 1400 surveyed (34{\%} response rate), of which 422 were analyzed. Similar proportions reported primarily using sutures (39{\%}) or staples (48{\%}); 13{\%} use both methods equally. More obstetricians at community hospitals primarily use sutures (48{\%} versus 39{\%}, p<0.001), while more at university hospitals primarily use staples (57{\%} versus 30{\%}, p<0.001). Listed in decreasing order of importance, sutures were preferred when considering patient satisfaction, keloid susceptibility, cosmesis, first Pfannenstiel incisions or cost. Staples were preferred when considering wound infections, obese patients, chorioamnionitis, HIV/AIDS or busy labor floors (p<0.001). Conclusion: The limited evidence to guide cesarean skin closure forces obstetricians to rely on personal experience. Our survey indicates that despite this limitation, obstetricians have specific preferences for cesarean skin closure method.",
author = "MacKeen, {A. Dhanya} and Tara Devaraj and Baxter, {Jason K.}",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/14767058.2012.755509",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "753--756",
journal = "Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine",
issn = "1476-7058",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "8",

}

Cesarean skin closure preferences : A survey of obstetricians. / MacKeen, A. Dhanya; Devaraj, Tara; Baxter, Jason K.

In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 8, 01.05.2013, p. 753-756.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cesarean skin closure preferences

T2 - A survey of obstetricians

AU - MacKeen, A. Dhanya

AU - Devaraj, Tara

AU - Baxter, Jason K.

PY - 2013/5/1

Y1 - 2013/5/1

N2 - Objective: In light of the limited evidence directing cesarean skin closure techniques, we evaluated the factors guiding obstetricians' preferences for closure method. Methods: From 07/11 to 12/11, an online survey was sent to obstetricians in ACOG Regions I and II. Obstetricians were asked to indicate their cesarean skin closure preferences when considering various factors and to rank the importance of these factors in their decision. Practice type, experience and usual method of closure were also assessed. Results: Responses were received from 470 of 1400 surveyed (34% response rate), of which 422 were analyzed. Similar proportions reported primarily using sutures (39%) or staples (48%); 13% use both methods equally. More obstetricians at community hospitals primarily use sutures (48% versus 39%, p<0.001), while more at university hospitals primarily use staples (57% versus 30%, p<0.001). Listed in decreasing order of importance, sutures were preferred when considering patient satisfaction, keloid susceptibility, cosmesis, first Pfannenstiel incisions or cost. Staples were preferred when considering wound infections, obese patients, chorioamnionitis, HIV/AIDS or busy labor floors (p<0.001). Conclusion: The limited evidence to guide cesarean skin closure forces obstetricians to rely on personal experience. Our survey indicates that despite this limitation, obstetricians have specific preferences for cesarean skin closure method.

AB - Objective: In light of the limited evidence directing cesarean skin closure techniques, we evaluated the factors guiding obstetricians' preferences for closure method. Methods: From 07/11 to 12/11, an online survey was sent to obstetricians in ACOG Regions I and II. Obstetricians were asked to indicate their cesarean skin closure preferences when considering various factors and to rank the importance of these factors in their decision. Practice type, experience and usual method of closure were also assessed. Results: Responses were received from 470 of 1400 surveyed (34% response rate), of which 422 were analyzed. Similar proportions reported primarily using sutures (39%) or staples (48%); 13% use both methods equally. More obstetricians at community hospitals primarily use sutures (48% versus 39%, p<0.001), while more at university hospitals primarily use staples (57% versus 30%, p<0.001). Listed in decreasing order of importance, sutures were preferred when considering patient satisfaction, keloid susceptibility, cosmesis, first Pfannenstiel incisions or cost. Staples were preferred when considering wound infections, obese patients, chorioamnionitis, HIV/AIDS or busy labor floors (p<0.001). Conclusion: The limited evidence to guide cesarean skin closure forces obstetricians to rely on personal experience. Our survey indicates that despite this limitation, obstetricians have specific preferences for cesarean skin closure method.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876560570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876560570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/14767058.2012.755509

DO - 10.3109/14767058.2012.755509

M3 - Article

C2 - 23211124

AN - SCOPUS:84876560570

VL - 26

SP - 753

EP - 756

JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

SN - 1476-7058

IS - 8

ER -