Changes in learning-style preferences: a reply to Ruble and Stout.

M. A. Geiger, Jeffrey Pinto

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This note is a reply to Ruble and Stout's 1992 critique of our 1991 study of changes in learning style over time. While some of their comments have merit, the remaining conclusions are that the dimension scores on the Learning Styles Inventory exhibit considerable stability over time and should be analyzed when assessing changes in learning style.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1072-1074
Number of pages3
JournalPsychological Reports
Volume70
Issue number3 Pt 2
StatePublished - Jun 1992

Fingerprint

Learning
Equipment and Supplies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{24f1e707fbcd4075998438c680574fc4,
title = "Changes in learning-style preferences: a reply to Ruble and Stout.",
abstract = "This note is a reply to Ruble and Stout's 1992 critique of our 1991 study of changes in learning style over time. While some of their comments have merit, the remaining conclusions are that the dimension scores on the Learning Styles Inventory exhibit considerable stability over time and should be analyzed when assessing changes in learning style.",
author = "Geiger, {M. A.} and Jeffrey Pinto",
year = "1992",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "1072--1074",
journal = "Psychological Reports",
issn = "0033-2941",
publisher = "Ammons Scientific Ltd",
number = "3 Pt 2",

}

Changes in learning-style preferences : a reply to Ruble and Stout. / Geiger, M. A.; Pinto, Jeffrey.

In: Psychological Reports, Vol. 70, No. 3 Pt 2, 06.1992, p. 1072-1074.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changes in learning-style preferences

T2 - a reply to Ruble and Stout.

AU - Geiger, M. A.

AU - Pinto, Jeffrey

PY - 1992/6

Y1 - 1992/6

N2 - This note is a reply to Ruble and Stout's 1992 critique of our 1991 study of changes in learning style over time. While some of their comments have merit, the remaining conclusions are that the dimension scores on the Learning Styles Inventory exhibit considerable stability over time and should be analyzed when assessing changes in learning style.

AB - This note is a reply to Ruble and Stout's 1992 critique of our 1991 study of changes in learning style over time. While some of their comments have merit, the remaining conclusions are that the dimension scores on the Learning Styles Inventory exhibit considerable stability over time and should be analyzed when assessing changes in learning style.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026871166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026871166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 1496074

AN - SCOPUS:0026871166

VL - 70

SP - 1072

EP - 1074

JO - Psychological Reports

JF - Psychological Reports

SN - 0033-2941

IS - 3 Pt 2

ER -