Chapter 5: Perceptions of agriculture's multifunctional role among rural Pennsylvanians

Martin H. Lenihan, Kathryn Jo Brasier, Richard C. Stedman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The policy approach of multifunctionality - that agriculture has benefits beyond the production of food and fiber - has been debated within global trade negotiations. Little is known about the perceptions of agriculture's multifunctional nature at the local level. These perceptions may be particularly pertinent in rural locations undergoing rapid transformations of the agricultural system, economic base, and related land uses. This chapter describes research conducted to examine the perceptions of agriculture's impact on local communities and the policy choices needed to support agriculture's multifunctionality. Methodology: Six focus groups were conducted in Pennsylvania, USA. Counties were selected to represent three differentiated rural spaces (contested, clientelist, preserved), in which production and consumption interests claims vie for control of rural land. Participants represented both production and consumption interests, and described their perceptions of local agriculture and policy preferences. Findings: Production and consumption interests across the study sites expressed views consonant with global discussions, in that agriculture provides significant positive impacts and few negative. However, locally specific issues related to taxes, land use planning, and farmland preservation dominated discussion. Participants supported a mix of policy tools (voluntary, regulatory, educational), but gave little credence to federal programs. Research limitations/implications: Policy initiatives to support agricultural multifunctionality need to be sensitive to local conditions and create an enabling environment to allow multiple stakeholders opportunities to identify issues and preferred policy mechanisms. Originality: Previous research has identified multifunctionality concepts at the global level; this chapter localizes multifunctionality, and examines potential hurdles to implementation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)127-149
Number of pages23
JournalResearch in Rural Sociology and Development
Volume14
StatePublished - Dec 1 2009

Fingerprint

Pennsylvanian
agriculture
land use
agricultural support
global trade
policy approach
economic system
land use planning
farming system
taxes
stakeholder
agricultural land
policy
food
planning
methodology
economics
community
consumption
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

@article{283d1122c41845aa8afa30f5ac83a194,
title = "Chapter 5: Perceptions of agriculture's multifunctional role among rural Pennsylvanians",
abstract = "Purpose: The policy approach of multifunctionality - that agriculture has benefits beyond the production of food and fiber - has been debated within global trade negotiations. Little is known about the perceptions of agriculture's multifunctional nature at the local level. These perceptions may be particularly pertinent in rural locations undergoing rapid transformations of the agricultural system, economic base, and related land uses. This chapter describes research conducted to examine the perceptions of agriculture's impact on local communities and the policy choices needed to support agriculture's multifunctionality. Methodology: Six focus groups were conducted in Pennsylvania, USA. Counties were selected to represent three differentiated rural spaces (contested, clientelist, preserved), in which production and consumption interests claims vie for control of rural land. Participants represented both production and consumption interests, and described their perceptions of local agriculture and policy preferences. Findings: Production and consumption interests across the study sites expressed views consonant with global discussions, in that agriculture provides significant positive impacts and few negative. However, locally specific issues related to taxes, land use planning, and farmland preservation dominated discussion. Participants supported a mix of policy tools (voluntary, regulatory, educational), but gave little credence to federal programs. Research limitations/implications: Policy initiatives to support agricultural multifunctionality need to be sensitive to local conditions and create an enabling environment to allow multiple stakeholders opportunities to identify issues and preferred policy mechanisms. Originality: Previous research has identified multifunctionality concepts at the global level; this chapter localizes multifunctionality, and examines potential hurdles to implementation.",
author = "Lenihan, {Martin H.} and Brasier, {Kathryn Jo} and Stedman, {Richard C.}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "127--149",
journal = "Research in Rural Sociology and Development",
issn = "1057-1922",
publisher = "JAI Press",

}

Chapter 5 : Perceptions of agriculture's multifunctional role among rural Pennsylvanians. / Lenihan, Martin H.; Brasier, Kathryn Jo; Stedman, Richard C.

In: Research in Rural Sociology and Development, Vol. 14, 01.12.2009, p. 127-149.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chapter 5

T2 - Perceptions of agriculture's multifunctional role among rural Pennsylvanians

AU - Lenihan, Martin H.

AU - Brasier, Kathryn Jo

AU - Stedman, Richard C.

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - Purpose: The policy approach of multifunctionality - that agriculture has benefits beyond the production of food and fiber - has been debated within global trade negotiations. Little is known about the perceptions of agriculture's multifunctional nature at the local level. These perceptions may be particularly pertinent in rural locations undergoing rapid transformations of the agricultural system, economic base, and related land uses. This chapter describes research conducted to examine the perceptions of agriculture's impact on local communities and the policy choices needed to support agriculture's multifunctionality. Methodology: Six focus groups were conducted in Pennsylvania, USA. Counties were selected to represent three differentiated rural spaces (contested, clientelist, preserved), in which production and consumption interests claims vie for control of rural land. Participants represented both production and consumption interests, and described their perceptions of local agriculture and policy preferences. Findings: Production and consumption interests across the study sites expressed views consonant with global discussions, in that agriculture provides significant positive impacts and few negative. However, locally specific issues related to taxes, land use planning, and farmland preservation dominated discussion. Participants supported a mix of policy tools (voluntary, regulatory, educational), but gave little credence to federal programs. Research limitations/implications: Policy initiatives to support agricultural multifunctionality need to be sensitive to local conditions and create an enabling environment to allow multiple stakeholders opportunities to identify issues and preferred policy mechanisms. Originality: Previous research has identified multifunctionality concepts at the global level; this chapter localizes multifunctionality, and examines potential hurdles to implementation.

AB - Purpose: The policy approach of multifunctionality - that agriculture has benefits beyond the production of food and fiber - has been debated within global trade negotiations. Little is known about the perceptions of agriculture's multifunctional nature at the local level. These perceptions may be particularly pertinent in rural locations undergoing rapid transformations of the agricultural system, economic base, and related land uses. This chapter describes research conducted to examine the perceptions of agriculture's impact on local communities and the policy choices needed to support agriculture's multifunctionality. Methodology: Six focus groups were conducted in Pennsylvania, USA. Counties were selected to represent three differentiated rural spaces (contested, clientelist, preserved), in which production and consumption interests claims vie for control of rural land. Participants represented both production and consumption interests, and described their perceptions of local agriculture and policy preferences. Findings: Production and consumption interests across the study sites expressed views consonant with global discussions, in that agriculture provides significant positive impacts and few negative. However, locally specific issues related to taxes, land use planning, and farmland preservation dominated discussion. Participants supported a mix of policy tools (voluntary, regulatory, educational), but gave little credence to federal programs. Research limitations/implications: Policy initiatives to support agricultural multifunctionality need to be sensitive to local conditions and create an enabling environment to allow multiple stakeholders opportunities to identify issues and preferred policy mechanisms. Originality: Previous research has identified multifunctionality concepts at the global level; this chapter localizes multifunctionality, and examines potential hurdles to implementation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950713916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950713916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77950713916

VL - 14

SP - 127

EP - 149

JO - Research in Rural Sociology and Development

JF - Research in Rural Sociology and Development

SN - 1057-1922

ER -