TY - JOUR
T1 - Characteristics and outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome related to COVID-19 in Belgian and French intensive care units according to antiviral strategies
T2 - the COVADIS multicentre observational study
AU - for the COVADIS study group
AU - Grimaldi, David
AU - Aissaoui, Nadia
AU - Blonz, Gauthier
AU - Carbutti, Giuseppe
AU - Courcelle, Romain
AU - Gaudry, Stephane
AU - Gaultier, Aurelie
AU - D’hondt, Alain
AU - Higny, Julien
AU - Horlait, Geoffrey
AU - Hraiech, Sami
AU - Lefebvre, Laurent
AU - Lejeune, Francois
AU - Ly, Andre
AU - Piagnerelli, Michael
AU - Sauneuf, Bertrand
AU - Serck, Nicolas
AU - Soumagne, Thibaud
AU - Szychowiak, Piotr
AU - Textoris, Julien
AU - Vandenbunder, Benoit
AU - Vinsonneau, Christophe
AU - Lascarrou, Jean Baptiste
AU - Biston, Patrick
AU - Colin, Gwenhael
AU - de Maere, Oriane
AU - Ebstein, Nathan
AU - Ehrmann, Stephan
AU - Foret, Frederic
AU - Haentjens, Lionel
AU - Helbert, Thibault
AU - Mesland, Jean Baptiste
AU - Monard, Celine
AU - Mongardon, Nicolas
AU - Ottavy, Gregoire
AU - Pasau, Thomas
AU - Piton, Gael
AU - Ponzetto, Ester
AU - Sejourne, Caroline
AU - Snacken, Morgane
AU - Souloy, Xavier
AU - Sylvestre, Aude
AU - Tartrat, Nicolas
AU - Vanbrussel, Cedric
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Mariana Ismael for Castor EDC (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) for technical support to design eCRF. We thank Dr Lemarie, MD, for assistance in preparing and reviewing the manuscript. DG and JBL had full access to all the data and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. We thank COVADIS study group investigators: Patrick Biston, Intensive Care. CHU-Charleroi, Marie Curie. Université Libre de Bruxelles. 140, Chaussée de Bruxelles. 6042-Charleroi, Belgium Gwenhael Colin, Medecine Intensive Reanimation, CHD Vendée, site de la Roche sur Yon, Les Oudairies, 85000 La Roche Sur Yon, France Oriane de Maere, Department of Intensive Care, CHR Mons-Hainaut, Mons, Belgium Nathan Ebstein, Réanimation médico-chirurgicale CHU Avicennes, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bobigny, France Stephan Ehrmann, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHRU Tours, Tours, France Frederic Foret, Unité de soins intensifs, CHU Dinant Godinne, site Dinant, Belgium Lionel Haentjens, Unités de sois intensifs CHU Ambroise Paré, Mons, Belgium Thibault Helbert, Réanimation polyvalente Centre Hospitalier du pays d’Aix, Aix en Provence, France Jean-Baptiste Mesland, Department of Intensive Care, centres hospitaliers de Jolimont, La Louvière, Belgium Celine Monard, Service de réanimation, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 5 Place D'Arsonval, Lyon, France Nicolas Mongardon, Service d'anesthésie-réanimation chirurgicale Unité de réanimation chirurgicale polyvalente Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France Gregoire Ottavy, Medecine Intensive Reanimation, CHU Nantes, 30 Boulevard Jean Monnet, 44093 Nantes Cedex 9, France Thomas Pasau, CHU UCL Namur, site Godinne, Av. Dr G. Therasse 1 5530, Yvoir, Belgium Gael Piton, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU Besançon, 3 Boulevard FLEMING, 25030 Besançon, France Ester Ponzetto, Unité de soins intensifs, Clinique Saint Pierre, Ottignies, Belgium Caroline Sejourne, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CH Germon et Gauthier, Béthune, France Morgane Snacken, Soins Intensifs, Hôpital Erasme, ULB, Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Bruxelles, Belgium Xavier Souloy, Réanimation—Médecine Intensive, Centre Hospitalier Public du Cotentin, BP208, 50102 Cherbourg-en-Cotentin, France Aude Sylvestre, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Assistance Publique—Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, 13015, Marseille, France Nicolas Tartrat, Groupe des anesthésistes réanimateurs, Hôpital Privé d’Antony, Antony, France Cedric Vanbrussel, Unité de soins intensifs, Clinique Notre Dame de Grâce, Gosselies, Belgium
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - Background: Limited data are available regarding antiviral therapy efficacy in most severe patients under mechanical ventilation for Covid-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: Comparison of antiviral strategies (none, hydroxychloroquine (OHQ), lopinavir/ritonavir (L/R), others (combination or remdesivir) in an observational multicentre cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe Covid-19 ARDS. The primary endpoint was the number of day 28 ventilator-free days (VFD). Patients who died before d28 were considered as having 0 VFD. The variable was dichotomized into “patients still ventilated or dead at day 28” versus “patients weaned and alive at day 28”. Results: We analyzed 415 patients (85 treated with standard of care (SOC), 57 with L/R, 220 with OHQ, and 53 others). The median number of d28-VFD was 0 (IQR 0–13) and differed between groups (P = 0.03), SOC patients having the highest d28-VFD. After adjustment for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, PaO2/FiO2 ratio and plateau pressure and accounting for center effect with a generalized linear mixed model, none of the antiviral strategies increased the chance of being alive and weaned from MV at day 28 compared to the SOC strategy (OR 0.48 CI95% (0.18–1.25); OR 0.96 (0.47–2.02) and OR 1.43 (0.53–4.04) for L/R, OHQ and other treatments, respectively). Acute kidney injury during ICU stay was frequent (55%); its incidence was higher in patients receiving lopinavir (66 vs 53%, P = 0.03). After adjustment for age, sex, BMI, chronic hypertension and chronic renal disease, the use of L/R was associated with an increased risk of renal replacement therapy (RRT). (OR 2.52 CI95% 1.16–5.59). Conclusion: In this multicentre observational study of moderate-to-severe Covid-19 ARDS patients, we did not observe any benefit among patients treated with OHQ or L/R compared with SOC. The use of L/R treatment was associated with an increased need for RRT. Take home message Neither hydroxychloroquine nor lopinavir/ritonavir as COVID-19 antiviral treatment is associated with higher ventilator-free days at day 28 when compared with standard of care (no antiviral treatment) in ICU patients under invasive mechanical ventilation. Lopinavir/ritonavir is associated with an increased risk of renal replacement therapy requirement. Tweet COVID-19: Insights from ARDS cohort: no signal of efficacy of any antiviral drugs. Lopinavir/ritonavir may be associated with need for RRT.
AB - Background: Limited data are available regarding antiviral therapy efficacy in most severe patients under mechanical ventilation for Covid-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: Comparison of antiviral strategies (none, hydroxychloroquine (OHQ), lopinavir/ritonavir (L/R), others (combination or remdesivir) in an observational multicentre cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe Covid-19 ARDS. The primary endpoint was the number of day 28 ventilator-free days (VFD). Patients who died before d28 were considered as having 0 VFD. The variable was dichotomized into “patients still ventilated or dead at day 28” versus “patients weaned and alive at day 28”. Results: We analyzed 415 patients (85 treated with standard of care (SOC), 57 with L/R, 220 with OHQ, and 53 others). The median number of d28-VFD was 0 (IQR 0–13) and differed between groups (P = 0.03), SOC patients having the highest d28-VFD. After adjustment for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, PaO2/FiO2 ratio and plateau pressure and accounting for center effect with a generalized linear mixed model, none of the antiviral strategies increased the chance of being alive and weaned from MV at day 28 compared to the SOC strategy (OR 0.48 CI95% (0.18–1.25); OR 0.96 (0.47–2.02) and OR 1.43 (0.53–4.04) for L/R, OHQ and other treatments, respectively). Acute kidney injury during ICU stay was frequent (55%); its incidence was higher in patients receiving lopinavir (66 vs 53%, P = 0.03). After adjustment for age, sex, BMI, chronic hypertension and chronic renal disease, the use of L/R was associated with an increased risk of renal replacement therapy (RRT). (OR 2.52 CI95% 1.16–5.59). Conclusion: In this multicentre observational study of moderate-to-severe Covid-19 ARDS patients, we did not observe any benefit among patients treated with OHQ or L/R compared with SOC. The use of L/R treatment was associated with an increased need for RRT. Take home message Neither hydroxychloroquine nor lopinavir/ritonavir as COVID-19 antiviral treatment is associated with higher ventilator-free days at day 28 when compared with standard of care (no antiviral treatment) in ICU patients under invasive mechanical ventilation. Lopinavir/ritonavir is associated with an increased risk of renal replacement therapy requirement. Tweet COVID-19: Insights from ARDS cohort: no signal of efficacy of any antiviral drugs. Lopinavir/ritonavir may be associated with need for RRT.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091973518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091973518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13613-020-00751-y
DO - 10.1186/s13613-020-00751-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 33025225
AN - SCOPUS:85091973518
SN - 2110-5820
VL - 10
JO - Annals of Intensive Care
JF - Annals of Intensive Care
IS - 1
M1 - 131
ER -