Characteristics of patients undergoing hysterectomy for failed endometrial ablation

Kristin A. Riley, Matthew Davies, Gerald Harkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Endometrial ablation is a minimally invasive procedure for menorrhagia. High success rates are documented with>90% of patients experiencing satisfaction. However, adequate relief after endometrial ablation is not obtained in a cohort of patients. The purpose of this study is to identify the characteristics of patients for whom endometrial ablation fails due to persistent symptoms, causing them to choose hysterectomy for definitive treatment. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent hysterectomy for persistent menorrhagia, pain, or both, who previously had endometrial ablation. We reviewed medical records including pathology reports from hysterectomy. We compared demographics to a group previously studied at our institution that were identified as satisfied 5 years after ablation. Results: The number of patients in our study group was 51 (n=51). Median age of patients was 39 (range 29-50) years. Average body mass index was 31 (range 19-47) kg/m2. Average parity was 1.9. Sixty-nine percent underwent tubal ligation. The majority were nonsmokers (75%). Ninety-six percent were Caucasian. Compared with the previously studied satisfied group, the only statistically significant difference was age. Of 51 patients, 11 (22%) noted pelvic pain as their chief concern. Menorrhagia was the chief concern in 22 (43%). Eighteen patients (35%) complained of both. The most common diagnosis was endometriosis, which was identified in 35 patients (68%). Leiomyomata were present in 33 patients (64%). Adenomyosis was identified in 22 patients (43%). Conclusions: Patients who present for hysterectomy after endometrial ablation have a high rate of endometriosis, adenomyosis, and leiomyomata, with endometriosis being the most common finding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)503-507
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2013

Fingerprint

Endometrial Ablation Techniques
Hysterectomy
Menorrhagia
Endometriosis
Adenomyosis
Leiomyoma
Tubal Sterilization
Pelvic Pain
Parity
Patient Satisfaction
Medical Records
Body Mass Index

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

@article{9e821c104bd645968d0c432447c63c54,
title = "Characteristics of patients undergoing hysterectomy for failed endometrial ablation",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: Endometrial ablation is a minimally invasive procedure for menorrhagia. High success rates are documented with>90{\%} of patients experiencing satisfaction. However, adequate relief after endometrial ablation is not obtained in a cohort of patients. The purpose of this study is to identify the characteristics of patients for whom endometrial ablation fails due to persistent symptoms, causing them to choose hysterectomy for definitive treatment. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent hysterectomy for persistent menorrhagia, pain, or both, who previously had endometrial ablation. We reviewed medical records including pathology reports from hysterectomy. We compared demographics to a group previously studied at our institution that were identified as satisfied 5 years after ablation. Results: The number of patients in our study group was 51 (n=51). Median age of patients was 39 (range 29-50) years. Average body mass index was 31 (range 19-47) kg/m2. Average parity was 1.9. Sixty-nine percent underwent tubal ligation. The majority were nonsmokers (75{\%}). Ninety-six percent were Caucasian. Compared with the previously studied satisfied group, the only statistically significant difference was age. Of 51 patients, 11 (22{\%}) noted pelvic pain as their chief concern. Menorrhagia was the chief concern in 22 (43{\%}). Eighteen patients (35{\%}) complained of both. The most common diagnosis was endometriosis, which was identified in 35 patients (68{\%}). Leiomyomata were present in 33 patients (64{\%}). Adenomyosis was identified in 22 patients (43{\%}). Conclusions: Patients who present for hysterectomy after endometrial ablation have a high rate of endometriosis, adenomyosis, and leiomyomata, with endometriosis being the most common finding.",
author = "Riley, {Kristin A.} and Matthew Davies and Gerald Harkins",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4293/108680813X13693422520602",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "503--507",
journal = "Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons",
issn = "1086-8089",
publisher = "Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons",
number = "4",

}

Characteristics of patients undergoing hysterectomy for failed endometrial ablation. / Riley, Kristin A.; Davies, Matthew; Harkins, Gerald.

In: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, Vol. 17, No. 4, 01.10.2013, p. 503-507.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characteristics of patients undergoing hysterectomy for failed endometrial ablation

AU - Riley, Kristin A.

AU - Davies, Matthew

AU - Harkins, Gerald

PY - 2013/10/1

Y1 - 2013/10/1

N2 - Background and Objectives: Endometrial ablation is a minimally invasive procedure for menorrhagia. High success rates are documented with>90% of patients experiencing satisfaction. However, adequate relief after endometrial ablation is not obtained in a cohort of patients. The purpose of this study is to identify the characteristics of patients for whom endometrial ablation fails due to persistent symptoms, causing them to choose hysterectomy for definitive treatment. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent hysterectomy for persistent menorrhagia, pain, or both, who previously had endometrial ablation. We reviewed medical records including pathology reports from hysterectomy. We compared demographics to a group previously studied at our institution that were identified as satisfied 5 years after ablation. Results: The number of patients in our study group was 51 (n=51). Median age of patients was 39 (range 29-50) years. Average body mass index was 31 (range 19-47) kg/m2. Average parity was 1.9. Sixty-nine percent underwent tubal ligation. The majority were nonsmokers (75%). Ninety-six percent were Caucasian. Compared with the previously studied satisfied group, the only statistically significant difference was age. Of 51 patients, 11 (22%) noted pelvic pain as their chief concern. Menorrhagia was the chief concern in 22 (43%). Eighteen patients (35%) complained of both. The most common diagnosis was endometriosis, which was identified in 35 patients (68%). Leiomyomata were present in 33 patients (64%). Adenomyosis was identified in 22 patients (43%). Conclusions: Patients who present for hysterectomy after endometrial ablation have a high rate of endometriosis, adenomyosis, and leiomyomata, with endometriosis being the most common finding.

AB - Background and Objectives: Endometrial ablation is a minimally invasive procedure for menorrhagia. High success rates are documented with>90% of patients experiencing satisfaction. However, adequate relief after endometrial ablation is not obtained in a cohort of patients. The purpose of this study is to identify the characteristics of patients for whom endometrial ablation fails due to persistent symptoms, causing them to choose hysterectomy for definitive treatment. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent hysterectomy for persistent menorrhagia, pain, or both, who previously had endometrial ablation. We reviewed medical records including pathology reports from hysterectomy. We compared demographics to a group previously studied at our institution that were identified as satisfied 5 years after ablation. Results: The number of patients in our study group was 51 (n=51). Median age of patients was 39 (range 29-50) years. Average body mass index was 31 (range 19-47) kg/m2. Average parity was 1.9. Sixty-nine percent underwent tubal ligation. The majority were nonsmokers (75%). Ninety-six percent were Caucasian. Compared with the previously studied satisfied group, the only statistically significant difference was age. Of 51 patients, 11 (22%) noted pelvic pain as their chief concern. Menorrhagia was the chief concern in 22 (43%). Eighteen patients (35%) complained of both. The most common diagnosis was endometriosis, which was identified in 35 patients (68%). Leiomyomata were present in 33 patients (64%). Adenomyosis was identified in 22 patients (43%). Conclusions: Patients who present for hysterectomy after endometrial ablation have a high rate of endometriosis, adenomyosis, and leiomyomata, with endometriosis being the most common finding.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891820445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891820445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4293/108680813X13693422520602

DO - 10.4293/108680813X13693422520602

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 503

EP - 507

JO - Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

JF - Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

SN - 1086-8089

IS - 4

ER -