Characterization of cokes from delayed Co-Coking of decant oil, coal, resid, and cracking catalyst

Ömer Gül, Gareth Mitchell, Roger Etter, Jim Miller, Caroline Elaine Clifford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The following focuses on the quality of coke produced from delayed coking blends of decant oil, coal, and resid, and it also examines the effect of adding a cracking catalyst to each blend. We also examine the role of coal, resid, and catalyst addition on the formation of green coke, calcined coke, and graphitized cokes. The overall goal was to see if use of lower quality feedstocks could produce marketable coke. The coal sample was cleaned using the best available technology to as low a level of ash yield (as determined by proximate analysis) as possible. Conversion and yield results from the delayed coking of DO, DO/coal, and DO/resid/coal as well as each reaction using catalyst are discussed. Gas products obtained from the delayed coking experiments were characterized, and results are discussed. Green cokes obtained from different delayed coking processes were evaluated using optical microscopy; the cokes were calcined and graphitized. X-ray diffraction, temperature-programmed oxidation, and proximate/ultimate analyses were used to characterize green coke, calcined coke, and graphitized coke. In general, the green coke generated from the various reaction conditions (DO and DO plus coal) produced a coke that is adequate as an anode grade coke and is suitable as a graphite filler, but because of either the sulfur and/or ash content is not suitable for nuclear graphite production or metallurgical coke. In general, adding catalyst increased the liquid yields, while decreasing the coke/gas yield, and improved the carbon quality, but added to the ash composition. For reactions of DO/coal/resid, the carbon is not suitable for anode grade coke, graphite, nuclear graphite, or metallurgical coke, and addition of catalyst actually decreased the quality of the coke.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-34
Number of pages14
JournalEnergy and Fuels
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2015

Fingerprint

Coal
Coking
Coke
Oils
Catalysts
Ashes
Graphite
Metallurgical coke
Coal ash
Anodes
Carbon
Gases
Sulfur
Feedstocks
Optical microscopy
Fillers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Fuel Technology
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Cite this

Gül, Ömer ; Mitchell, Gareth ; Etter, Roger ; Miller, Jim ; Clifford, Caroline Elaine. / Characterization of cokes from delayed Co-Coking of decant oil, coal, resid, and cracking catalyst. In: Energy and Fuels. 2015 ; Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 21-34.
@article{49b845e7fc8f43c6a1f8d31fc23fe865,
title = "Characterization of cokes from delayed Co-Coking of decant oil, coal, resid, and cracking catalyst",
abstract = "The following focuses on the quality of coke produced from delayed coking blends of decant oil, coal, and resid, and it also examines the effect of adding a cracking catalyst to each blend. We also examine the role of coal, resid, and catalyst addition on the formation of green coke, calcined coke, and graphitized cokes. The overall goal was to see if use of lower quality feedstocks could produce marketable coke. The coal sample was cleaned using the best available technology to as low a level of ash yield (as determined by proximate analysis) as possible. Conversion and yield results from the delayed coking of DO, DO/coal, and DO/resid/coal as well as each reaction using catalyst are discussed. Gas products obtained from the delayed coking experiments were characterized, and results are discussed. Green cokes obtained from different delayed coking processes were evaluated using optical microscopy; the cokes were calcined and graphitized. X-ray diffraction, temperature-programmed oxidation, and proximate/ultimate analyses were used to characterize green coke, calcined coke, and graphitized coke. In general, the green coke generated from the various reaction conditions (DO and DO plus coal) produced a coke that is adequate as an anode grade coke and is suitable as a graphite filler, but because of either the sulfur and/or ash content is not suitable for nuclear graphite production or metallurgical coke. In general, adding catalyst increased the liquid yields, while decreasing the coke/gas yield, and improved the carbon quality, but added to the ash composition. For reactions of DO/coal/resid, the carbon is not suitable for anode grade coke, graphite, nuclear graphite, or metallurgical coke, and addition of catalyst actually decreased the quality of the coke.",
author = "{\"O}mer G{\"u}l and Gareth Mitchell and Roger Etter and Jim Miller and Clifford, {Caroline Elaine}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1021/ef501767w",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "21--34",
journal = "Energy & Fuels",
issn = "0887-0624",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "1",

}

Characterization of cokes from delayed Co-Coking of decant oil, coal, resid, and cracking catalyst. / Gül, Ömer; Mitchell, Gareth; Etter, Roger; Miller, Jim; Clifford, Caroline Elaine.

In: Energy and Fuels, Vol. 29, No. 1, 15.01.2015, p. 21-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characterization of cokes from delayed Co-Coking of decant oil, coal, resid, and cracking catalyst

AU - Gül, Ömer

AU - Mitchell, Gareth

AU - Etter, Roger

AU - Miller, Jim

AU - Clifford, Caroline Elaine

PY - 2015/1/15

Y1 - 2015/1/15

N2 - The following focuses on the quality of coke produced from delayed coking blends of decant oil, coal, and resid, and it also examines the effect of adding a cracking catalyst to each blend. We also examine the role of coal, resid, and catalyst addition on the formation of green coke, calcined coke, and graphitized cokes. The overall goal was to see if use of lower quality feedstocks could produce marketable coke. The coal sample was cleaned using the best available technology to as low a level of ash yield (as determined by proximate analysis) as possible. Conversion and yield results from the delayed coking of DO, DO/coal, and DO/resid/coal as well as each reaction using catalyst are discussed. Gas products obtained from the delayed coking experiments were characterized, and results are discussed. Green cokes obtained from different delayed coking processes were evaluated using optical microscopy; the cokes were calcined and graphitized. X-ray diffraction, temperature-programmed oxidation, and proximate/ultimate analyses were used to characterize green coke, calcined coke, and graphitized coke. In general, the green coke generated from the various reaction conditions (DO and DO plus coal) produced a coke that is adequate as an anode grade coke and is suitable as a graphite filler, but because of either the sulfur and/or ash content is not suitable for nuclear graphite production or metallurgical coke. In general, adding catalyst increased the liquid yields, while decreasing the coke/gas yield, and improved the carbon quality, but added to the ash composition. For reactions of DO/coal/resid, the carbon is not suitable for anode grade coke, graphite, nuclear graphite, or metallurgical coke, and addition of catalyst actually decreased the quality of the coke.

AB - The following focuses on the quality of coke produced from delayed coking blends of decant oil, coal, and resid, and it also examines the effect of adding a cracking catalyst to each blend. We also examine the role of coal, resid, and catalyst addition on the formation of green coke, calcined coke, and graphitized cokes. The overall goal was to see if use of lower quality feedstocks could produce marketable coke. The coal sample was cleaned using the best available technology to as low a level of ash yield (as determined by proximate analysis) as possible. Conversion and yield results from the delayed coking of DO, DO/coal, and DO/resid/coal as well as each reaction using catalyst are discussed. Gas products obtained from the delayed coking experiments were characterized, and results are discussed. Green cokes obtained from different delayed coking processes were evaluated using optical microscopy; the cokes were calcined and graphitized. X-ray diffraction, temperature-programmed oxidation, and proximate/ultimate analyses were used to characterize green coke, calcined coke, and graphitized coke. In general, the green coke generated from the various reaction conditions (DO and DO plus coal) produced a coke that is adequate as an anode grade coke and is suitable as a graphite filler, but because of either the sulfur and/or ash content is not suitable for nuclear graphite production or metallurgical coke. In general, adding catalyst increased the liquid yields, while decreasing the coke/gas yield, and improved the carbon quality, but added to the ash composition. For reactions of DO/coal/resid, the carbon is not suitable for anode grade coke, graphite, nuclear graphite, or metallurgical coke, and addition of catalyst actually decreased the quality of the coke.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949119276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949119276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/ef501767w

DO - 10.1021/ef501767w

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84949119276

VL - 29

SP - 21

EP - 34

JO - Energy & Fuels

JF - Energy & Fuels

SN - 0887-0624

IS - 1

ER -