TY - JOUR
T1 - Chemically Propelled Nano and Micromotors in the Body
T2 - Quo Vadis?
AU - Somasundar, Ambika
AU - Sen, Ayusman
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Professor Samuel Sanchez and Dr. Tania Patiño for helpful discussions. The authors acknowledge the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550‐20‐1‐0393) for their financial support.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH
PY - 2021/2/4
Y1 - 2021/2/4
N2 - The active delivery of drugs to disease sites in response to specific biomarkers is a holy grail in theranostics. If successful, it would greatly diminish the therapeutic dosage and reduce collateral cytotoxicity. In this context, the development of nano and micromotors that are able to harvest local energy to move directionally is an important breakthrough. However, serious hurdles remain before such active systems can be employed in vivo in therapeutic applications. Such motors and their energy sources must be safe and biocompatible, they should be able to move through complex body fluids, and have the ability to reach specific cellular targets. Given the complexity in the design and deployment of nano and micromotors, it is also critically important to show that they are significantly superior to inactive “smart” nanoparticles in theranostics. Furthermore, receiving regulatory approval requires the ability to scale-up the production of nano and micromotors with uniformity in structure, function, and activity. In this essay, the limitations of the current nano and micromotors and the issues that need to be resolved before such motors are likely to find theranostic applications are discussed.
AB - The active delivery of drugs to disease sites in response to specific biomarkers is a holy grail in theranostics. If successful, it would greatly diminish the therapeutic dosage and reduce collateral cytotoxicity. In this context, the development of nano and micromotors that are able to harvest local energy to move directionally is an important breakthrough. However, serious hurdles remain before such active systems can be employed in vivo in therapeutic applications. Such motors and their energy sources must be safe and biocompatible, they should be able to move through complex body fluids, and have the ability to reach specific cellular targets. Given the complexity in the design and deployment of nano and micromotors, it is also critically important to show that they are significantly superior to inactive “smart” nanoparticles in theranostics. Furthermore, receiving regulatory approval requires the ability to scale-up the production of nano and micromotors with uniformity in structure, function, and activity. In this essay, the limitations of the current nano and micromotors and the issues that need to be resolved before such motors are likely to find theranostic applications are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099256620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85099256620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/smll.202007102
DO - 10.1002/smll.202007102
M3 - Article
C2 - 33432722
AN - SCOPUS:85099256620
SN - 1613-6810
VL - 17
JO - Small
JF - Small
IS - 5
M1 - 2007102
ER -