Chinese Modernism, Mimetic Desire, and European Time

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scholarship on Chinese modernism differs little from scholarship on any "local" modernism, so long as one understands that the generic modernism to which these local modernisms refer has for some time now been the modernism of a select few national or urban locations in Europe and North America, and of aesthetic attitudes, and objects that express those attitudes, produced between the middle of the nineteenth century and the middle of the twentieth century. This article discusses four issues whose consideration ought to precede any discussion of how any such local modernism is thought: modernism and the Western history of the modern; globality and the geography of mimetic desire; global thinking and the intercontamination of the terms; and modernism after European time. To include China among the global modernisms, to discover a global modernism at all, requires abandoning the temporal logic that has until now structured the field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Global Modernisms
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780199968800
ISBN (Print)9780195338904
DOIs
StatePublished - May 21 2012

Fingerprint

History
Geography
Temporal Logic
Aesthetic Object
Aesthetic Attitude
China

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Hayot, E. R. (2012). Chinese Modernism, Mimetic Desire, and European Time. In The Oxford Handbook of Global Modernisms Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195338904.013.0006
Hayot, Eric Robert. / Chinese Modernism, Mimetic Desire, and European Time. The Oxford Handbook of Global Modernisms. Oxford University Press, 2012.
@inbook{65a30aa3fbbd402d98abb2bb6e6963fa,
title = "Chinese Modernism, Mimetic Desire, and European Time",
abstract = "Scholarship on Chinese modernism differs little from scholarship on any {"}local{"} modernism, so long as one understands that the generic modernism to which these local modernisms refer has for some time now been the modernism of a select few national or urban locations in Europe and North America, and of aesthetic attitudes, and objects that express those attitudes, produced between the middle of the nineteenth century and the middle of the twentieth century. This article discusses four issues whose consideration ought to precede any discussion of how any such local modernism is thought: modernism and the Western history of the modern; globality and the geography of mimetic desire; global thinking and the intercontamination of the terms; and modernism after European time. To include China among the global modernisms, to discover a global modernism at all, requires abandoning the temporal logic that has until now structured the field.",
author = "Hayot, {Eric Robert}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195338904.013.0006",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780195338904",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Global Modernisms",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Hayot, ER 2012, Chinese Modernism, Mimetic Desire, and European Time. in The Oxford Handbook of Global Modernisms. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195338904.013.0006

Chinese Modernism, Mimetic Desire, and European Time. / Hayot, Eric Robert.

The Oxford Handbook of Global Modernisms. Oxford University Press, 2012.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Chinese Modernism, Mimetic Desire, and European Time

AU - Hayot, Eric Robert

PY - 2012/5/21

Y1 - 2012/5/21

N2 - Scholarship on Chinese modernism differs little from scholarship on any "local" modernism, so long as one understands that the generic modernism to which these local modernisms refer has for some time now been the modernism of a select few national or urban locations in Europe and North America, and of aesthetic attitudes, and objects that express those attitudes, produced between the middle of the nineteenth century and the middle of the twentieth century. This article discusses four issues whose consideration ought to precede any discussion of how any such local modernism is thought: modernism and the Western history of the modern; globality and the geography of mimetic desire; global thinking and the intercontamination of the terms; and modernism after European time. To include China among the global modernisms, to discover a global modernism at all, requires abandoning the temporal logic that has until now structured the field.

AB - Scholarship on Chinese modernism differs little from scholarship on any "local" modernism, so long as one understands that the generic modernism to which these local modernisms refer has for some time now been the modernism of a select few national or urban locations in Europe and North America, and of aesthetic attitudes, and objects that express those attitudes, produced between the middle of the nineteenth century and the middle of the twentieth century. This article discusses four issues whose consideration ought to precede any discussion of how any such local modernism is thought: modernism and the Western history of the modern; globality and the geography of mimetic desire; global thinking and the intercontamination of the terms; and modernism after European time. To include China among the global modernisms, to discover a global modernism at all, requires abandoning the temporal logic that has until now structured the field.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923315891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923315891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195338904.013.0006

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195338904.013.0006

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84923315891

SN - 9780195338904

BT - The Oxford Handbook of Global Modernisms

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -

Hayot ER. Chinese Modernism, Mimetic Desire, and European Time. In The Oxford Handbook of Global Modernisms. Oxford University Press. 2012 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195338904.013.0006