Crónica de una elección anunciada: Las elecciones judiciales de 2017 en Bolivia

Translated title of the contribution: Chronicle of an election foretold: The 2017 Bolivian judicial elections

Amanda Driscoll, Michael J. Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

On December 3, 2017, Bolivian voters went to the polls to vote for their national judges. Bolivia is the only country in modern world history to use direct elections to select its judges, and the adoption and implementation of these elections has been highly contentious. We report on this election and contend that though formally compliant with the Bolivian Constitution, the mas supermajority used its powers to limit the ability of the public to make its voice heard in an electorally meaningful way. Voters registered their discontent by spoiling more ballots than in any election in Bolivian history. Relying on original survey data as well as municipal-level election returns, we demonstrate that candidates’ electoral fates in this election were tied more closely to their position on the ballot than their ascriptive characteristics or professional qualifications, and voters’ decisions to cast spoiled votes correlate strongly with their dissatisfaction with the broader mas political project.

Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)41-64
Number of pages24
JournalPolitica y Gobierno
Volume26
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

election
voter
direct election
world history
Bolivia
qualification
constitution
candidacy
ability
history

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{52139d57053a4f89b48d68fa3846901a,
title = "Cr{\'o}nica de una elecci{\'o}n anunciada: Las elecciones judiciales de 2017 en Bolivia",
abstract = "On December 3, 2017, Bolivian voters went to the polls to vote for their national judges. Bolivia is the only country in modern world history to use direct elections to select its judges, and the adoption and implementation of these elections has been highly contentious. We report on this election and contend that though formally compliant with the Bolivian Constitution, the mas supermajority used its powers to limit the ability of the public to make its voice heard in an electorally meaningful way. Voters registered their discontent by spoiling more ballots than in any election in Bolivian history. Relying on original survey data as well as municipal-level election returns, we demonstrate that candidates’ electoral fates in this election were tied more closely to their position on the ballot than their ascriptive characteristics or professional qualifications, and voters’ decisions to cast spoiled votes correlate strongly with their dissatisfaction with the broader mas political project.",
author = "Amanda Driscoll and Nelson, {Michael J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "Spanish",
volume = "26",
pages = "41--64",
journal = "Politica y Gobierno",
issn = "1405-1060",
publisher = "Centro de Investigacion y Docencia Economicas A.C.",
number = "1",

}

Crónica de una elección anunciada : Las elecciones judiciales de 2017 en Bolivia. / Driscoll, Amanda; Nelson, Michael J.

In: Politica y Gobierno, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 41-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crónica de una elección anunciada

T2 - Las elecciones judiciales de 2017 en Bolivia

AU - Driscoll, Amanda

AU - Nelson, Michael J.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - On December 3, 2017, Bolivian voters went to the polls to vote for their national judges. Bolivia is the only country in modern world history to use direct elections to select its judges, and the adoption and implementation of these elections has been highly contentious. We report on this election and contend that though formally compliant with the Bolivian Constitution, the mas supermajority used its powers to limit the ability of the public to make its voice heard in an electorally meaningful way. Voters registered their discontent by spoiling more ballots than in any election in Bolivian history. Relying on original survey data as well as municipal-level election returns, we demonstrate that candidates’ electoral fates in this election were tied more closely to their position on the ballot than their ascriptive characteristics or professional qualifications, and voters’ decisions to cast spoiled votes correlate strongly with their dissatisfaction with the broader mas political project.

AB - On December 3, 2017, Bolivian voters went to the polls to vote for their national judges. Bolivia is the only country in modern world history to use direct elections to select its judges, and the adoption and implementation of these elections has been highly contentious. We report on this election and contend that though formally compliant with the Bolivian Constitution, the mas supermajority used its powers to limit the ability of the public to make its voice heard in an electorally meaningful way. Voters registered their discontent by spoiling more ballots than in any election in Bolivian history. Relying on original survey data as well as municipal-level election returns, we demonstrate that candidates’ electoral fates in this election were tied more closely to their position on the ballot than their ascriptive characteristics or professional qualifications, and voters’ decisions to cast spoiled votes correlate strongly with their dissatisfaction with the broader mas political project.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069178624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069178624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85069178624

VL - 26

SP - 41

EP - 64

JO - Politica y Gobierno

JF - Politica y Gobierno

SN - 1405-1060

IS - 1

ER -