Cigarette Brand Switching. Relating Assessment Strategies to the Critical Issues

Martin J. McMorrow, R. M. Foxx

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The debate regarding what occurs when people switch to low-tar and low-nicotine cigarettes encompasses three research issues (i.e., risk reduction, nicotine regulation, and compensation), and each requires a different assessment strategy. Yet many studies have failed to differentiate these issues and have offered conclusions that are based on questionable inferences regarding exposure to specific smoke constituents. This article relates the various assessment strategies to the critical issues in cigarette brand switching by: (a) tracing the development of current assessment strategies and clarifying the relative strengths of mouth-level, machine-based, behavioral, and biochemical measures, (b) reviewing a variety of biochemical assessments including carbon monoxide, thiocyanate, nicotine, and cotinine, (c) examining the utility of these measures in risk reduction, nicotine regulation, and compensation studies, and (d) suggesting future directions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)139-159
Number of pages21
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume98
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1985

Fingerprint

Nicotine
Tobacco Products
Risk Reduction Behavior
Tars
Cotinine
Carbon Monoxide
Smoke
Mouth
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History and Philosophy of Science
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

McMorrow, Martin J. ; Foxx, R. M. / Cigarette Brand Switching. Relating Assessment Strategies to the Critical Issues. In: Psychological Bulletin. 1985 ; Vol. 98, No. 1. pp. 139-159.
@article{534db5edd83c4d2e85798256ecea62b7,
title = "Cigarette Brand Switching. Relating Assessment Strategies to the Critical Issues",
abstract = "The debate regarding what occurs when people switch to low-tar and low-nicotine cigarettes encompasses three research issues (i.e., risk reduction, nicotine regulation, and compensation), and each requires a different assessment strategy. Yet many studies have failed to differentiate these issues and have offered conclusions that are based on questionable inferences regarding exposure to specific smoke constituents. This article relates the various assessment strategies to the critical issues in cigarette brand switching by: (a) tracing the development of current assessment strategies and clarifying the relative strengths of mouth-level, machine-based, behavioral, and biochemical measures, (b) reviewing a variety of biochemical assessments including carbon monoxide, thiocyanate, nicotine, and cotinine, (c) examining the utility of these measures in risk reduction, nicotine regulation, and compensation studies, and (d) suggesting future directions.",
author = "McMorrow, {Martin J.} and Foxx, {R. M.}",
year = "1985",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1037/0033-2909.98.1.139",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "98",
pages = "139--159",
journal = "Psychological Bulletin",
issn = "0033-2909",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Cigarette Brand Switching. Relating Assessment Strategies to the Critical Issues. / McMorrow, Martin J.; Foxx, R. M.

In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 98, No. 1, 07.1985, p. 139-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cigarette Brand Switching. Relating Assessment Strategies to the Critical Issues

AU - McMorrow, Martin J.

AU - Foxx, R. M.

PY - 1985/7

Y1 - 1985/7

N2 - The debate regarding what occurs when people switch to low-tar and low-nicotine cigarettes encompasses three research issues (i.e., risk reduction, nicotine regulation, and compensation), and each requires a different assessment strategy. Yet many studies have failed to differentiate these issues and have offered conclusions that are based on questionable inferences regarding exposure to specific smoke constituents. This article relates the various assessment strategies to the critical issues in cigarette brand switching by: (a) tracing the development of current assessment strategies and clarifying the relative strengths of mouth-level, machine-based, behavioral, and biochemical measures, (b) reviewing a variety of biochemical assessments including carbon monoxide, thiocyanate, nicotine, and cotinine, (c) examining the utility of these measures in risk reduction, nicotine regulation, and compensation studies, and (d) suggesting future directions.

AB - The debate regarding what occurs when people switch to low-tar and low-nicotine cigarettes encompasses three research issues (i.e., risk reduction, nicotine regulation, and compensation), and each requires a different assessment strategy. Yet many studies have failed to differentiate these issues and have offered conclusions that are based on questionable inferences regarding exposure to specific smoke constituents. This article relates the various assessment strategies to the critical issues in cigarette brand switching by: (a) tracing the development of current assessment strategies and clarifying the relative strengths of mouth-level, machine-based, behavioral, and biochemical measures, (b) reviewing a variety of biochemical assessments including carbon monoxide, thiocyanate, nicotine, and cotinine, (c) examining the utility of these measures in risk reduction, nicotine regulation, and compensation studies, and (d) suggesting future directions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022092195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022092195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0033-2909.98.1.139

DO - 10.1037/0033-2909.98.1.139

M3 - Review article

VL - 98

SP - 139

EP - 159

JO - Psychological Bulletin

JF - Psychological Bulletin

SN - 0033-2909

IS - 1

ER -