Civic awakening in the jury room: A test of the connection between jury deliberation and political participation

John Gastil, E. Pierre Deess, Phil Weiser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

78 Scopus citations

Abstract

Deliberative democratic theory posits that civic discussion leads to increased involvement in public affairs. To test this claim, this study explored the link between jury deliberation and electoral participation. It was hypothesized that empanelled jurors who reach verdicts are more likely to vote in subsequent elections than empanelled jurors who fail to reach a verdict or even begin deliberations. Data collected in Thurston County, Washington, supported this hypothesis. Controlling for other trial features and past voting frequency, citizens who served on a criminal jury that reached a verdict were more likely to vote in subsequent elections than were those jurors who deadlocked, were dismissed during trial, or merely served as alternates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)585-595
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume64
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2002

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Civic awakening in the jury room: A test of the connection between jury deliberation and political participation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this