TY - JOUR
T1 - Climate change will both exacerbate and attenuate urbanization impacts on streamflow regimes in southern Willamette Valley, Oregon
AU - Wu, Hong
AU - Johnson, Bart R.
N1 - Funding Information:
The Envision modelling system development for the study area was funded through the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Dynamics of Coupled Natural and Human Systems Program under award number 0816475. We would like to thank David Hulse, John Bolte, Robert Ribe, Patricia McDowell, and Patrick Bartlein for guiding and improving this research; Derek Booth, Curtis DeGasperi, and Martin Dieterich for guidance on regional flow-ecology science; and Philip Mote, David Rupp, and Katherine Hegewisch for assistance developing downscaled future climate data. We also wish to acknowledge the journal editor and two anonymous reviewers whose thoughtful comments helped improve the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - Interactions between climate change and urbanization may affect stream ecosystems in unexpected ways. With an integrated modelling framework, we assessed the combined hydrological impacts of climate change and urbanization under historical and future climate regimes across varied development scenarios in three watersheds in the Willamette Valley, Oregon. First, through an agent-based land use change model Envision, we created four development scenarios that consisted of 2 × 2 combinations of regional growth (compact population growth in urban cores vs. dispersed growth into rural areas) and stormwater management scenarios (with vs. without integrated stormwater management, ISM). ISM was defined as the integration of strategic organization of land uses with site-scale stormwater best management practices. Next, two future climate regimes were developed by statistically downscaling projections from two general circulation models (CanESM2 and CNRM-CM5) that performed well in replicating historical climate. The hydrological assessment of these scenarios was then conducted with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool. Using 10 ecologically significant flow metrics, we evaluated each scenario based on the magnitude of change in each metric and the degree to which such changes could be mitigated. Climate change alone led to a drying trend in flow regimes under both future climates. Combined with urbanization, it magnified changes in six of 10 metrics but attenuated impacts for three other measures of flashiness in at least one basin. The combination of compact growth and ISM effectively mitigated alterations for seven (out of nine) metrics sensitive to the combined impacts in at least one basin, with ISM being more effective than compact growth. The modelling framework teased out both nuanced differences and generalizable trends in hydrological impacts of urbanization and climate change and offers key methodological innovations towards an integrated framework capable of linking landscape planning mechanisms with the goal of sustaining stream ecosystem health.
AB - Interactions between climate change and urbanization may affect stream ecosystems in unexpected ways. With an integrated modelling framework, we assessed the combined hydrological impacts of climate change and urbanization under historical and future climate regimes across varied development scenarios in three watersheds in the Willamette Valley, Oregon. First, through an agent-based land use change model Envision, we created four development scenarios that consisted of 2 × 2 combinations of regional growth (compact population growth in urban cores vs. dispersed growth into rural areas) and stormwater management scenarios (with vs. without integrated stormwater management, ISM). ISM was defined as the integration of strategic organization of land uses with site-scale stormwater best management practices. Next, two future climate regimes were developed by statistically downscaling projections from two general circulation models (CanESM2 and CNRM-CM5) that performed well in replicating historical climate. The hydrological assessment of these scenarios was then conducted with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool. Using 10 ecologically significant flow metrics, we evaluated each scenario based on the magnitude of change in each metric and the degree to which such changes could be mitigated. Climate change alone led to a drying trend in flow regimes under both future climates. Combined with urbanization, it magnified changes in six of 10 metrics but attenuated impacts for three other measures of flashiness in at least one basin. The combination of compact growth and ISM effectively mitigated alterations for seven (out of nine) metrics sensitive to the combined impacts in at least one basin, with ISM being more effective than compact growth. The modelling framework teased out both nuanced differences and generalizable trends in hydrological impacts of urbanization and climate change and offers key methodological innovations towards an integrated framework capable of linking landscape planning mechanisms with the goal of sustaining stream ecosystem health.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067518053&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067518053&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/rra.3454
DO - 10.1002/rra.3454
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85067518053
SN - 1535-1459
VL - 35
SP - 818
EP - 832
JO - River Research and Applications
JF - River Research and Applications
IS - 7
ER -