Climate field reconstruction under stationary and nonstationary forcing

Scott Rutherford, M. E. Mann, T. L. Delworth, R. J. Stouffer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The fidelity of climate reconstructions employing covariance-based calibration techniques is tested with varying levels of sparseness of available data during intervals of relatively constant (stationary) and increasing (non-stationary) forcing. These tests employ a regularized expectation-maximization algorithm using surface temperature data from both the instrumental record and coupled ocean-atmosphere model integrations. The results indicate that if radiative forcing is relatively constant over a data-rich calibration period and increases over a data-sparse reconstruction period, the imputed temperatures in the reconstruction period may be biased and may underestimate the true temperature trend. However, if radiative forcing is stationary over a data-sparse reconstruction period and increases over a data-rich calibration period, the imputed values in the reconstruction period are nearly unbiased. These results indicate that using the data-rich part of the twentieth-century instrumental record (which contains an increasing temperature trend plausibly associated with increasing radiative forcing) for calibration does not significantly bias reconstructions of prior climate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)462-479
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Climate
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2003

Fingerprint

climate
radiative forcing
calibration
temperature
twentieth century
surface temperature
atmosphere
ocean
trend

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Rutherford, Scott ; Mann, M. E. ; Delworth, T. L. ; Stouffer, R. J. / Climate field reconstruction under stationary and nonstationary forcing. In: Journal of Climate. 2003 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 462-479.
@article{431ed88e137342569eb6cd6ac5ecf0ba,
title = "Climate field reconstruction under stationary and nonstationary forcing",
abstract = "The fidelity of climate reconstructions employing covariance-based calibration techniques is tested with varying levels of sparseness of available data during intervals of relatively constant (stationary) and increasing (non-stationary) forcing. These tests employ a regularized expectation-maximization algorithm using surface temperature data from both the instrumental record and coupled ocean-atmosphere model integrations. The results indicate that if radiative forcing is relatively constant over a data-rich calibration period and increases over a data-sparse reconstruction period, the imputed temperatures in the reconstruction period may be biased and may underestimate the true temperature trend. However, if radiative forcing is stationary over a data-sparse reconstruction period and increases over a data-rich calibration period, the imputed values in the reconstruction period are nearly unbiased. These results indicate that using the data-rich part of the twentieth-century instrumental record (which contains an increasing temperature trend plausibly associated with increasing radiative forcing) for calibration does not significantly bias reconstructions of prior climate.",
author = "Scott Rutherford and Mann, {M. E.} and Delworth, {T. L.} and Stouffer, {R. J.}",
year = "2003",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<0462:CFRUSA>2.0.CO;2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "462--479",
journal = "Journal of Climate",
issn = "0894-8755",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "3",

}

Climate field reconstruction under stationary and nonstationary forcing. / Rutherford, Scott; Mann, M. E.; Delworth, T. L.; Stouffer, R. J.

In: Journal of Climate, Vol. 16, No. 3, 01.02.2003, p. 462-479.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Climate field reconstruction under stationary and nonstationary forcing

AU - Rutherford, Scott

AU - Mann, M. E.

AU - Delworth, T. L.

AU - Stouffer, R. J.

PY - 2003/2/1

Y1 - 2003/2/1

N2 - The fidelity of climate reconstructions employing covariance-based calibration techniques is tested with varying levels of sparseness of available data during intervals of relatively constant (stationary) and increasing (non-stationary) forcing. These tests employ a regularized expectation-maximization algorithm using surface temperature data from both the instrumental record and coupled ocean-atmosphere model integrations. The results indicate that if radiative forcing is relatively constant over a data-rich calibration period and increases over a data-sparse reconstruction period, the imputed temperatures in the reconstruction period may be biased and may underestimate the true temperature trend. However, if radiative forcing is stationary over a data-sparse reconstruction period and increases over a data-rich calibration period, the imputed values in the reconstruction period are nearly unbiased. These results indicate that using the data-rich part of the twentieth-century instrumental record (which contains an increasing temperature trend plausibly associated with increasing radiative forcing) for calibration does not significantly bias reconstructions of prior climate.

AB - The fidelity of climate reconstructions employing covariance-based calibration techniques is tested with varying levels of sparseness of available data during intervals of relatively constant (stationary) and increasing (non-stationary) forcing. These tests employ a regularized expectation-maximization algorithm using surface temperature data from both the instrumental record and coupled ocean-atmosphere model integrations. The results indicate that if radiative forcing is relatively constant over a data-rich calibration period and increases over a data-sparse reconstruction period, the imputed temperatures in the reconstruction period may be biased and may underestimate the true temperature trend. However, if radiative forcing is stationary over a data-sparse reconstruction period and increases over a data-rich calibration period, the imputed values in the reconstruction period are nearly unbiased. These results indicate that using the data-rich part of the twentieth-century instrumental record (which contains an increasing temperature trend plausibly associated with increasing radiative forcing) for calibration does not significantly bias reconstructions of prior climate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141453168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141453168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<0462:CFRUSA>2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<0462:CFRUSA>2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0141453168

VL - 16

SP - 462

EP - 479

JO - Journal of Climate

JF - Journal of Climate

SN - 0894-8755

IS - 3

ER -