Clinical descriptive measures of shoulder range of motion for a healthy, young and physically active cohort

Giampietro Vairo, Michele L. Duffey, Brett D. Owens, Kenneth L. Cameron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The objective of this innovative research study was to describe clinical shoulder complex range of motion (ROM) measures for a young, healthy, and physically active population. This investigation represents a cross-sectional experiment conducted at a military academy-based sports medicine center. Military cadets with no history of shoulder complex injury were assessed within two months of enrollment in the academy; 548 men (18.8 ± 1.0 yr, 75.2 ± 12.2 kg, 178.3 ± 7.4 cm) and 74 women (18.7 ± 0.9 yr, 63.2 ± 8.9 kg, 165.2 ± 6.9 cm) participated. Descriptive measures included cross-body adduction (CAD), flexion (FLX), external rotation (ER0) with the shoulder complex in adduction and elbow flexed to 90°, internal and external rotation (IR, ER) with the shoulder complex at 90° of abduction and elbow flexed to 90° as well as arc (ARC) of IR-ER using standardized clinical quantification techniques. Bilateral and sex differences were evaluated using dependent and independent t-tests, respectively. Percentiles by arm dominance and sex were also calculated for all ROM measures.Results: Data were normally distributed. Active and passive ROM measures indicated significant bilateral differences (P < 0.05) except for ARC. Sex differences (P < 0.05) were noted for active and passive CAD, FLX and ER0 for the dominant arm as well as active and passive CAD, FLX and ARC for the non-dominant arm.Conclusions: These original data provide descriptive measures for shoulder complex ROM excursions, assisting sports medicine practitioners in potentially identifying clinical deficiencies and functional outcomes following shoulder injury.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number33
JournalSports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy and Technology
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 10 2012

Fingerprint

Articular Range of Motion
AIDS-Related Complex
Sports Medicine
Arm
Elbow
Sex Characteristics
Research
Population
Shoulder Injuries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{612a56b0c82344518a696786837a81c0,
title = "Clinical descriptive measures of shoulder range of motion for a healthy, young and physically active cohort",
abstract = "Background: The objective of this innovative research study was to describe clinical shoulder complex range of motion (ROM) measures for a young, healthy, and physically active population. This investigation represents a cross-sectional experiment conducted at a military academy-based sports medicine center. Military cadets with no history of shoulder complex injury were assessed within two months of enrollment in the academy; 548 men (18.8 ± 1.0 yr, 75.2 ± 12.2 kg, 178.3 ± 7.4 cm) and 74 women (18.7 ± 0.9 yr, 63.2 ± 8.9 kg, 165.2 ± 6.9 cm) participated. Descriptive measures included cross-body adduction (CAD), flexion (FLX), external rotation (ER0) with the shoulder complex in adduction and elbow flexed to 90°, internal and external rotation (IR, ER) with the shoulder complex at 90° of abduction and elbow flexed to 90° as well as arc (ARC) of IR-ER using standardized clinical quantification techniques. Bilateral and sex differences were evaluated using dependent and independent t-tests, respectively. Percentiles by arm dominance and sex were also calculated for all ROM measures.Results: Data were normally distributed. Active and passive ROM measures indicated significant bilateral differences (P < 0.05) except for ARC. Sex differences (P < 0.05) were noted for active and passive CAD, FLX and ER0 for the dominant arm as well as active and passive CAD, FLX and ARC for the non-dominant arm.Conclusions: These original data provide descriptive measures for shoulder complex ROM excursions, assisting sports medicine practitioners in potentially identifying clinical deficiencies and functional outcomes following shoulder injury.",
author = "Giampietro Vairo and Duffey, {Michele L.} and Owens, {Brett D.} and Cameron, {Kenneth L.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1186/1758-2555-4-33",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
journal = "Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy and Technology",
issn = "1758-2555",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Clinical descriptive measures of shoulder range of motion for a healthy, young and physically active cohort. / Vairo, Giampietro; Duffey, Michele L.; Owens, Brett D.; Cameron, Kenneth L.

In: Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 1, 33, 10.09.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical descriptive measures of shoulder range of motion for a healthy, young and physically active cohort

AU - Vairo, Giampietro

AU - Duffey, Michele L.

AU - Owens, Brett D.

AU - Cameron, Kenneth L.

PY - 2012/9/10

Y1 - 2012/9/10

N2 - Background: The objective of this innovative research study was to describe clinical shoulder complex range of motion (ROM) measures for a young, healthy, and physically active population. This investigation represents a cross-sectional experiment conducted at a military academy-based sports medicine center. Military cadets with no history of shoulder complex injury were assessed within two months of enrollment in the academy; 548 men (18.8 ± 1.0 yr, 75.2 ± 12.2 kg, 178.3 ± 7.4 cm) and 74 women (18.7 ± 0.9 yr, 63.2 ± 8.9 kg, 165.2 ± 6.9 cm) participated. Descriptive measures included cross-body adduction (CAD), flexion (FLX), external rotation (ER0) with the shoulder complex in adduction and elbow flexed to 90°, internal and external rotation (IR, ER) with the shoulder complex at 90° of abduction and elbow flexed to 90° as well as arc (ARC) of IR-ER using standardized clinical quantification techniques. Bilateral and sex differences were evaluated using dependent and independent t-tests, respectively. Percentiles by arm dominance and sex were also calculated for all ROM measures.Results: Data were normally distributed. Active and passive ROM measures indicated significant bilateral differences (P < 0.05) except for ARC. Sex differences (P < 0.05) were noted for active and passive CAD, FLX and ER0 for the dominant arm as well as active and passive CAD, FLX and ARC for the non-dominant arm.Conclusions: These original data provide descriptive measures for shoulder complex ROM excursions, assisting sports medicine practitioners in potentially identifying clinical deficiencies and functional outcomes following shoulder injury.

AB - Background: The objective of this innovative research study was to describe clinical shoulder complex range of motion (ROM) measures for a young, healthy, and physically active population. This investigation represents a cross-sectional experiment conducted at a military academy-based sports medicine center. Military cadets with no history of shoulder complex injury were assessed within two months of enrollment in the academy; 548 men (18.8 ± 1.0 yr, 75.2 ± 12.2 kg, 178.3 ± 7.4 cm) and 74 women (18.7 ± 0.9 yr, 63.2 ± 8.9 kg, 165.2 ± 6.9 cm) participated. Descriptive measures included cross-body adduction (CAD), flexion (FLX), external rotation (ER0) with the shoulder complex in adduction and elbow flexed to 90°, internal and external rotation (IR, ER) with the shoulder complex at 90° of abduction and elbow flexed to 90° as well as arc (ARC) of IR-ER using standardized clinical quantification techniques. Bilateral and sex differences were evaluated using dependent and independent t-tests, respectively. Percentiles by arm dominance and sex were also calculated for all ROM measures.Results: Data were normally distributed. Active and passive ROM measures indicated significant bilateral differences (P < 0.05) except for ARC. Sex differences (P < 0.05) were noted for active and passive CAD, FLX and ER0 for the dominant arm as well as active and passive CAD, FLX and ARC for the non-dominant arm.Conclusions: These original data provide descriptive measures for shoulder complex ROM excursions, assisting sports medicine practitioners in potentially identifying clinical deficiencies and functional outcomes following shoulder injury.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867673151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867673151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1758-2555-4-33

DO - 10.1186/1758-2555-4-33

M3 - Article

C2 - 22964130

AN - SCOPUS:84867673151

VL - 4

JO - Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy and Technology

JF - Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy and Technology

SN - 1758-2555

IS - 1

M1 - 33

ER -