Clinical tests explain blunted cortisol responsiveness but not mild hypercortisolism in amenorrheic runners

Mary Jane De Souza, A. A. Luciano, J. C. Arce, Laurence Demers, A. B. Loucks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To investigate mechanisms of blunted adrenocortical responsiveness to exercise and mild hypercortisolism in amenorrheic runners, adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH-(1-24), 0.25 mg Cortrosyn] stimulation tests were performed in the presence and absence of overnight dexamethasone (1 mg) suppression (DX and NDX condition, respectively) in six eumenorrheic sedentary women (ES), nine eumenorrheic runners (ER), and nine amenorrheic runners (AR). Before the NDX stimulation test, plasma cortisol was higher (P < 0.001) in AR than in ER and ES. The cortisol response to the NDX stimulation test was blunted (P < 0.001) in AR but reached similar (P > 0.7) peak levels in all groups. Dexamethasone suppressed (P < 0.001) cortisol to similar (P > 0.5) levels (~20 nmol/l) in all groups. In AR, cortisol responses to the DX test were larger (P < 0.03) than to the NDX test and similar (P > 0.6) in the three groups, again reaching comparable (P > 0.8) peak levels. The blunted cortisol response to stimulation in AR in the presence of their mild hypercortisolism appears to be due to a normal limitation in maximal adrenal secretory capacity. Extrapituitary modulators of adrenal responsiveness to ACTH may explain the mild hypercortisolism observed in AR, but limitations of these tests prevent a central negative- feedback defect or an intrinsic adrenal abnormality from being excluded until results of additional studies with even lower doses of dexamethasone and submaximal doses of ACTH-(1-24) are available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1302-1309
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Applied Physiology
Volume76
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

Fingerprint

Cosyntropin
Cushing Syndrome
Dexamethasone
Hydrocortisone
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone
Exercise

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

De Souza, Mary Jane ; Luciano, A. A. ; Arce, J. C. ; Demers, Laurence ; Loucks, A. B. / Clinical tests explain blunted cortisol responsiveness but not mild hypercortisolism in amenorrheic runners. In: Journal of Applied Physiology. 1994 ; Vol. 76, No. 3. pp. 1302-1309.
@article{6ff5f9040a3848af8a1269f17342d9e7,
title = "Clinical tests explain blunted cortisol responsiveness but not mild hypercortisolism in amenorrheic runners",
abstract = "To investigate mechanisms of blunted adrenocortical responsiveness to exercise and mild hypercortisolism in amenorrheic runners, adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH-(1-24), 0.25 mg Cortrosyn] stimulation tests were performed in the presence and absence of overnight dexamethasone (1 mg) suppression (DX and NDX condition, respectively) in six eumenorrheic sedentary women (ES), nine eumenorrheic runners (ER), and nine amenorrheic runners (AR). Before the NDX stimulation test, plasma cortisol was higher (P < 0.001) in AR than in ER and ES. The cortisol response to the NDX stimulation test was blunted (P < 0.001) in AR but reached similar (P > 0.7) peak levels in all groups. Dexamethasone suppressed (P < 0.001) cortisol to similar (P > 0.5) levels (~20 nmol/l) in all groups. In AR, cortisol responses to the DX test were larger (P < 0.03) than to the NDX test and similar (P > 0.6) in the three groups, again reaching comparable (P > 0.8) peak levels. The blunted cortisol response to stimulation in AR in the presence of their mild hypercortisolism appears to be due to a normal limitation in maximal adrenal secretory capacity. Extrapituitary modulators of adrenal responsiveness to ACTH may explain the mild hypercortisolism observed in AR, but limitations of these tests prevent a central negative- feedback defect or an intrinsic adrenal abnormality from being excluded until results of additional studies with even lower doses of dexamethasone and submaximal doses of ACTH-(1-24) are available.",
author = "{De Souza}, {Mary Jane} and Luciano, {A. A.} and Arce, {J. C.} and Laurence Demers and Loucks, {A. B.}",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1152/jappl.1994.76.3.1302",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "1302--1309",
journal = "Journal of Applied Physiology",
issn = "8750-7587",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "3",

}

Clinical tests explain blunted cortisol responsiveness but not mild hypercortisolism in amenorrheic runners. / De Souza, Mary Jane; Luciano, A. A.; Arce, J. C.; Demers, Laurence; Loucks, A. B.

In: Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 76, No. 3, 01.01.1994, p. 1302-1309.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical tests explain blunted cortisol responsiveness but not mild hypercortisolism in amenorrheic runners

AU - De Souza, Mary Jane

AU - Luciano, A. A.

AU - Arce, J. C.

AU - Demers, Laurence

AU - Loucks, A. B.

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - To investigate mechanisms of blunted adrenocortical responsiveness to exercise and mild hypercortisolism in amenorrheic runners, adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH-(1-24), 0.25 mg Cortrosyn] stimulation tests were performed in the presence and absence of overnight dexamethasone (1 mg) suppression (DX and NDX condition, respectively) in six eumenorrheic sedentary women (ES), nine eumenorrheic runners (ER), and nine amenorrheic runners (AR). Before the NDX stimulation test, plasma cortisol was higher (P < 0.001) in AR than in ER and ES. The cortisol response to the NDX stimulation test was blunted (P < 0.001) in AR but reached similar (P > 0.7) peak levels in all groups. Dexamethasone suppressed (P < 0.001) cortisol to similar (P > 0.5) levels (~20 nmol/l) in all groups. In AR, cortisol responses to the DX test were larger (P < 0.03) than to the NDX test and similar (P > 0.6) in the three groups, again reaching comparable (P > 0.8) peak levels. The blunted cortisol response to stimulation in AR in the presence of their mild hypercortisolism appears to be due to a normal limitation in maximal adrenal secretory capacity. Extrapituitary modulators of adrenal responsiveness to ACTH may explain the mild hypercortisolism observed in AR, but limitations of these tests prevent a central negative- feedback defect or an intrinsic adrenal abnormality from being excluded until results of additional studies with even lower doses of dexamethasone and submaximal doses of ACTH-(1-24) are available.

AB - To investigate mechanisms of blunted adrenocortical responsiveness to exercise and mild hypercortisolism in amenorrheic runners, adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH-(1-24), 0.25 mg Cortrosyn] stimulation tests were performed in the presence and absence of overnight dexamethasone (1 mg) suppression (DX and NDX condition, respectively) in six eumenorrheic sedentary women (ES), nine eumenorrheic runners (ER), and nine amenorrheic runners (AR). Before the NDX stimulation test, plasma cortisol was higher (P < 0.001) in AR than in ER and ES. The cortisol response to the NDX stimulation test was blunted (P < 0.001) in AR but reached similar (P > 0.7) peak levels in all groups. Dexamethasone suppressed (P < 0.001) cortisol to similar (P > 0.5) levels (~20 nmol/l) in all groups. In AR, cortisol responses to the DX test were larger (P < 0.03) than to the NDX test and similar (P > 0.6) in the three groups, again reaching comparable (P > 0.8) peak levels. The blunted cortisol response to stimulation in AR in the presence of their mild hypercortisolism appears to be due to a normal limitation in maximal adrenal secretory capacity. Extrapituitary modulators of adrenal responsiveness to ACTH may explain the mild hypercortisolism observed in AR, but limitations of these tests prevent a central negative- feedback defect or an intrinsic adrenal abnormality from being excluded until results of additional studies with even lower doses of dexamethasone and submaximal doses of ACTH-(1-24) are available.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028271735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028271735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/jappl.1994.76.3.1302

DO - 10.1152/jappl.1994.76.3.1302

M3 - Article

C2 - 8005875

AN - SCOPUS:0028271735

VL - 76

SP - 1302

EP - 1309

JO - Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - Journal of Applied Physiology

SN - 8750-7587

IS - 3

ER -