Close enough but not too far

Assessing the effects of university-industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism

Rick Welsh, Leland Luther Glenna, William Lacy, Dina Biscotti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Analysts assessing the impact of university-industry research relations (UIRRs) and increasing proprietary behavior on the part of universities often focus on single-indicators or adopt promotional or critical stances. However, assessing impacts of shifts toward a more proprietary university is inherently complex because of potential countervailing or mediating factors within working relationships. From interviews with 84 biological scientists at nine universities we find scientists view UIRRS and university intellectual property (IP) policies in complex and often conflicting ways. For example, university scientists believe UIRRs are valuable for increasing contact with scientists, but are problematic because working with industry can restrict communication among scientists. Also scientists believe university IP policies should shield their work from opportunistic behavior and at the same time be designed to attract industry partners. In addition scientists believe universities use their IP policies primarily as revenue raising vehicles and secondarily to address public good issues such as technology transfer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1854-1864
Number of pages11
JournalResearch Policy
Volume37
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2008

Fingerprint

Intellectual property
Industry
Technology transfer
Capitalism
Communication

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

@article{59b3e5258f0949d385f35fae7a6016bd,
title = "Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university-industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism",
abstract = "Analysts assessing the impact of university-industry research relations (UIRRs) and increasing proprietary behavior on the part of universities often focus on single-indicators or adopt promotional or critical stances. However, assessing impacts of shifts toward a more proprietary university is inherently complex because of potential countervailing or mediating factors within working relationships. From interviews with 84 biological scientists at nine universities we find scientists view UIRRS and university intellectual property (IP) policies in complex and often conflicting ways. For example, university scientists believe UIRRs are valuable for increasing contact with scientists, but are problematic because working with industry can restrict communication among scientists. Also scientists believe university IP policies should shield their work from opportunistic behavior and at the same time be designed to attract industry partners. In addition scientists believe universities use their IP policies primarily as revenue raising vehicles and secondarily to address public good issues such as technology transfer.",
author = "Rick Welsh and Glenna, {Leland Luther} and William Lacy and Dina Biscotti",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "1854--1864",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "10",

}

Close enough but not too far : Assessing the effects of university-industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism. / Welsh, Rick; Glenna, Leland Luther; Lacy, William; Biscotti, Dina.

In: Research Policy, Vol. 37, No. 10, 01.12.2008, p. 1854-1864.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Close enough but not too far

T2 - Assessing the effects of university-industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism

AU - Welsh, Rick

AU - Glenna, Leland Luther

AU - Lacy, William

AU - Biscotti, Dina

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - Analysts assessing the impact of university-industry research relations (UIRRs) and increasing proprietary behavior on the part of universities often focus on single-indicators or adopt promotional or critical stances. However, assessing impacts of shifts toward a more proprietary university is inherently complex because of potential countervailing or mediating factors within working relationships. From interviews with 84 biological scientists at nine universities we find scientists view UIRRS and university intellectual property (IP) policies in complex and often conflicting ways. For example, university scientists believe UIRRs are valuable for increasing contact with scientists, but are problematic because working with industry can restrict communication among scientists. Also scientists believe university IP policies should shield their work from opportunistic behavior and at the same time be designed to attract industry partners. In addition scientists believe universities use their IP policies primarily as revenue raising vehicles and secondarily to address public good issues such as technology transfer.

AB - Analysts assessing the impact of university-industry research relations (UIRRs) and increasing proprietary behavior on the part of universities often focus on single-indicators or adopt promotional or critical stances. However, assessing impacts of shifts toward a more proprietary university is inherently complex because of potential countervailing or mediating factors within working relationships. From interviews with 84 biological scientists at nine universities we find scientists view UIRRS and university intellectual property (IP) policies in complex and often conflicting ways. For example, university scientists believe UIRRs are valuable for increasing contact with scientists, but are problematic because working with industry can restrict communication among scientists. Also scientists believe university IP policies should shield their work from opportunistic behavior and at the same time be designed to attract industry partners. In addition scientists believe universities use their IP policies primarily as revenue raising vehicles and secondarily to address public good issues such as technology transfer.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55549107474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=55549107474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.010

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.010

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 1854

EP - 1864

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 10

ER -