Close reading

What is reading for?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Close reading has been a key shift in classroom instruction under the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). The CCSS positions evidence extraction as the purpose for reading in school and is clear that close reading is the means by which this should occur. Using alternate readings of the picture book, Letting Swift River Go, I’ll argue for the importance of reading with critical place consciousness while offering a critique of close reading as the only authorized textual approach within the CCSS. While close reading advocates point to its pedagogical potential, neglected in these discussions are questions about the broader purposes of learning to read in school. Despite the intuitive appeal of close reading, considering the practice through critical place consciousness suggests it is an inadequate construction of what reading is and what reading can do. To make this argument, I offer two readings of Letting Swift River Go, a close reading and a place-conscious reading, and conclude with a discussion about the implications of reading with a sole focus on what lies within the four corners of a text.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)338-355
Number of pages18
JournalCurriculum Inquiry
Volume49
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 27 2019

Fingerprint

consciousness
river
learning to read
school
appeal
instruction
classroom
evidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

Eppley, Karen. / Close reading : What is reading for?. In: Curriculum Inquiry. 2019 ; Vol. 49, No. 3. pp. 338-355.
@article{cc11c610219142d39ee14bd5734a5cfb,
title = "Close reading: What is reading for?",
abstract = "Close reading has been a key shift in classroom instruction under the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). The CCSS positions evidence extraction as the purpose for reading in school and is clear that close reading is the means by which this should occur. Using alternate readings of the picture book, Letting Swift River Go, I’ll argue for the importance of reading with critical place consciousness while offering a critique of close reading as the only authorized textual approach within the CCSS. While close reading advocates point to its pedagogical potential, neglected in these discussions are questions about the broader purposes of learning to read in school. Despite the intuitive appeal of close reading, considering the practice through critical place consciousness suggests it is an inadequate construction of what reading is and what reading can do. To make this argument, I offer two readings of Letting Swift River Go, a close reading and a place-conscious reading, and conclude with a discussion about the implications of reading with a sole focus on what lies within the four corners of a text.",
author = "Karen Eppley",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1080/03626784.2019.1631701",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "338--355",
journal = "Curriculum Inquiry",
issn = "0362-6784",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Close reading : What is reading for? / Eppley, Karen.

In: Curriculum Inquiry, Vol. 49, No. 3, 27.05.2019, p. 338-355.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Close reading

T2 - What is reading for?

AU - Eppley, Karen

PY - 2019/5/27

Y1 - 2019/5/27

N2 - Close reading has been a key shift in classroom instruction under the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). The CCSS positions evidence extraction as the purpose for reading in school and is clear that close reading is the means by which this should occur. Using alternate readings of the picture book, Letting Swift River Go, I’ll argue for the importance of reading with critical place consciousness while offering a critique of close reading as the only authorized textual approach within the CCSS. While close reading advocates point to its pedagogical potential, neglected in these discussions are questions about the broader purposes of learning to read in school. Despite the intuitive appeal of close reading, considering the practice through critical place consciousness suggests it is an inadequate construction of what reading is and what reading can do. To make this argument, I offer two readings of Letting Swift River Go, a close reading and a place-conscious reading, and conclude with a discussion about the implications of reading with a sole focus on what lies within the four corners of a text.

AB - Close reading has been a key shift in classroom instruction under the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). The CCSS positions evidence extraction as the purpose for reading in school and is clear that close reading is the means by which this should occur. Using alternate readings of the picture book, Letting Swift River Go, I’ll argue for the importance of reading with critical place consciousness while offering a critique of close reading as the only authorized textual approach within the CCSS. While close reading advocates point to its pedagogical potential, neglected in these discussions are questions about the broader purposes of learning to read in school. Despite the intuitive appeal of close reading, considering the practice through critical place consciousness suggests it is an inadequate construction of what reading is and what reading can do. To make this argument, I offer two readings of Letting Swift River Go, a close reading and a place-conscious reading, and conclude with a discussion about the implications of reading with a sole focus on what lies within the four corners of a text.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069057000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069057000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03626784.2019.1631701

DO - 10.1080/03626784.2019.1631701

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 338

EP - 355

JO - Curriculum Inquiry

JF - Curriculum Inquiry

SN - 0362-6784

IS - 3

ER -